Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
“Sportershernia/plaatsen matje” Prof. dr. C.H.J. van Eijck Afd. Heelkunde Chirurg Clubarts Sportsman’s hernia Sportsman’s hernia • Chronic groin pain – Incidence: 6% – 60% during active soccer carier – 50% > 20 weeks complaints • Differential diagnosis Differential diagnosis Groin injury • Muscle and tendon injury – Tendon-bone or tendon-muscle – Avulsion fracture • Adductor longus, rectus femoris or abdominis • X-Pelvis, bone scan, ultrasound or MRI Differential diagnosis Groin injury • Osteïtis pubis – Painfull symfysis and adductortenoperiostitis – Direct trauma – Pelvic instability/Sacroiliacal abnormalities • 25% Radiologic abnormalities • X-Pelvis, bone scan, ultrasound or MRI Osteïtis pubis Osteïtis pubis Differential diagnosis Groin injury • Stressfracture – Ramus inferior os pubis (5%) – Collum femoris avascular necrosis Femur head • X-Pelvis, bone scan, (MRI) Differential diagnosis Groin injury • Urologic diseae – Prostatitis – Epididymitis – Urethritis – Hydrocèle testis – Non-descending testicle • Rectal toucher, bact. culture, ultrasound Differential diagnosis Groin injury •Hip en Spine disease – – – – – – – Osteochondritis lumbal verterbra M. Scheuermann Discus pathology., L1 en L2 Cam type femoroacetabular impingement Congenital hipdysplasia Epifysiolysis femur headkop Avascular necrosis femur head •X-LWK (+3/4), X-femur (Faux-profile), bone scan and CT-scan (arthography) Differential diagnosis Groin injury • Nerve entrapment/previous surgery – N. ilio-inguinalis (symfysis) – N. genitofemoralis (testicle) Differential diagnosis Groin injury • Nerve entrapment/previous surgery – N. ilio-inguinalis (symfysis) – N. genitofemoralis (testicle) – N. obturatorius (med. thigh and adductor weakness) • Proof blockade and/or EMG N. obturatorius (med. thigh and adductor weakness) Nerve entrapment N. obturatorius (med. thigh an adductor weakness) Physical examination Groin injury Renee Dannenburg Physical examination Groin injury • • • • • Lower back, SI Joint and hip Abdominal muscles Muscles of the upper legs Rectal toucher Palp funiculus and testicles Physical examination Groin injury • • • • Lower back, SI Joint and hip Abdominal muscles Muscles of the upper legs Rectal exam., palp funiculus and testicles • Painfull int. and ext. annulus with Painfull and ext. annulus with elevated elevatedint. intra-abdominal pressure intra-abdominal pressure Sportsman’s hernia • • • • Weakness of the post. inguinal wall Symptomatic non-palpable hernia Disruption of the ext. obl. aponeurosis Pubalgy Complaints • • • • • Long existing groin pain Pain around the external annulus Combination with adductor-tendopathy Good reaction on NSAID’s Increased pain with elevated intraabdominal pressure Pathofysiology Sportsman’s hernia Post wall inguinal canal: fascia transversalis No striated muscle fibers Funiculus through the int. annulus Pathofysiology Sportsman’s hernia Pathofysiology Sportsman’s hernia Post wall inguinal canal: fascia transversalis No striated muscle fibers Funiculus through the int. annulus Weakness post. wall Lat. Hernia Tension peritoneum Nerve entrapment Treatment Sportsman’s hernia • Conservative – Rest, Fysiotherapy and NSAID’s Renee Dannenburg Treatment Sportsman’s hernia • Conservative – Rest, Fysiotherapy and NSAID’s • Operative – Strengthening of the post. Wall of the inguinal canal – Conventional (Lichtensteinplastiek) – Laparoscopic Patients Sportsman’s hernia • Since 1998 till present: n=240 • (Semi)professional n=98 (4 women) • 76 soccer, 4 atletics , 3 tennis, 4 cycling, 11 misc. • Amateur n=142 (3 women) • 127 soccer, 15 misc. Patients Sportsman’s hernia • Mean Age: 25 ± 4.5 year (17-36) • Time complaints: 3 months till >2 years Diagnostics Sportsman’s hernia • Herniografie (n=7) – High false-negative percentage • • • • • • Ultrasonography (n=167) X-pelvic and femur (n=68) Bone scan (n=53) CT-scan (n=22) MRI (n=57) Laparoscopy (n=1) 1 Indirect H .inguinalis 2 Patients Sportsman’s hernia • Open Lichtenstein n=3 • Laparoscopic TEP n=237 • Tenotomy n=12 • Left n=86 • Right n=89 • Both n=65 Total Extra Perinoneal (TEP) Total Extra Perinoneal (TEP) Total Extra Perinoneal (TEP) Laparoscopy TEP right Total Extra Perinoneal (TEP) Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Total Extra Perinoneal (TEP) Total Extra Perinoneal (TEP) Peroperative findings Sportsman’s hernia • (Min.) lateral hernia n=65 • • • • (Min.) medial hernia n=24 Preperitoneal lipoma n=39 Enlarged lymph nodes n=32 No abnormallities n=80 Complications Sportsman’s hernia • Sup. woundinfection (S.aureus) (n=4) • Adductor longus tendinopathy (n=14) tenotomie (n=4) • Mesh irritation/seroma (Prolene®) (n=12) • Mesh displacement ( n=4) • Giant cell tumor re prox. femur (n=1) • Sports recovery Sportsman’s hernia Time Revalidation Week 0 - 1 Week 1 - 2 Renee Dannenburg Week 2 - 3 Week 3 - 5 Week 6 Sportsman’s hernia Time Purpose Therapy Week 0 - 1 Wound recovery Pain management Walking 5 km/h Week 1 - 2 Optimizing scar tissue Preventing muscle atrophia Aqua training Power walking Cycle ergometer Isometric training Rect. Abd. Steps Week 2 - 3 Dynamic training Rect. Abd. Functional exercise Sit-ups Running Lunges Week 3 - 5 Sport specific training Weight training Normal training Week 6 Normal training Sportsman’s hernia Sportsman’s hernia • Recovery – Without tenotomy: 4-8 weeks – With tenotomy: 8- 16 weeks Conclusion The TEP is an efficient method for the treatment of patients with a Sportsman’s hernia Dank voor jullie aandacht en veel succes verder