Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Concept to Practice: New Advances in the Treatment of GI Cancers 2016 Community Oncology Alliance Conference Orlando, FL Thomas George, MD, FACP Director, GI Oncology Program Director, Experimental Therapeutics Incubator University of Florida Health Cancer Center @TGeorgeMD | [email protected] Disclosures Institutional Research Funding: Bayer Bristol Myers Squibb Celgene NewLink Genetics Consultant: Bayer NewLink Genetics Educational Objectives 1. Review the past year of research leading to new treatments for patients with GI cancers 2. Discuss the incorporation of these treatments in the context of current standards of care 3. Anticipate upcoming trial results which may further change the treatment landscape 2016 Estimated US Cancer: New GI Cases Prostate 21% Lung & bronchus 14% Men Women 29% Breast 13% Lung & bronchus Colorectal 8% 8% Colorectal Urinary bladder 7% 7% Uterine corpus Melanoma 6% 6% Thyroid NHL 5% 4% NHL Kidney 5% 3% Melanoma Leukemia 4% 3% Leukemia H&N 4% 3% Pancreas Liver/Cholangio 3% 3% Kidney All Other Sites 23% 21% All Other Sites ACS – Surveillance Research 2015 2016 Estimated US Cancer: GI Cancer Deaths Lung & bronchus 27% Men Women 26% Lung & bronchus Prostate 8% 14% Breast Colorectal 8% 8% Colorectal Pancreas 7% 7% Pancreas Liver/Cholangio 6% 5% Ovary Leukemia 4% 4% Uterine corpus Esophagus 4% 4% Leukemia Urinary bladder 4% 3% Liver/Cholangio NHL 4% 3% NHL Brain/CNS 3% 2% Brain/CNS All other sites 25% 24% All other sites ACS – Surveillance Research 2015 Taken All Together • Colorectal cancer is 3rd most common cancer and the 2nd leading cause of cancer deaths • Slowly declining rates of incidence and deaths • Pancreatic cancer is the 3rd leading cause of cancer deaths • Rising rates projected as 2nd leading cause of cancer deaths by 2030 • Liver and cholangio rates are rising worldwide Rahib L et al. Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 1;74(11):2913-21 Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma & Anti-VEGF therapy • Bevacizumab FAILED to demonstrate OS advantage in 1st-line therapy (AVAGAST Trial) • Anti-VEGF therapy demonstrated activity and led to FDAapproval of Ramucirumab alone or in combination with paclitaxel in previously treated mEGA • REGARD & RAINBOW trials • Taxanes are the most widely used 2nd-line tx for mEGA Ohtsu A, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3968-3976 REGARD Trial BSC ± Ramucirumab 2nd Line Treatment Pts with metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma progressing on first-line platinum- and/or fluoropyrimidinecontaining combination therapy, ECOG PS 0-1 (N = 355) BSC + Ramucirumab 8 mg/kg IV q2w (n = 238) BSC + Placebo (n = 117) Treatment until PD, unacceptable toxicity, or death • Primary objective: OS • Secondary endpoints: PFS, 12-wk PFS, ORR, DoR, QoL, safety Fuchs CS, et al. Lancet. 2014;383:31-39 RAINBOW Trial Paclitaxel ± Ramucirumab 2nd Line Treatment Pts with metastatic or locally adv unresectable gastric or GEJ cancer progressing on first-line platinum and fluoropyrimidine+/- anthracycline containing combination therapy, ECOG PS 0-1 (N = 665) Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 Days 1, 8, 15 + Ramucirumab 8 mg/kg Days 1, 15 (n = 330) Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 Days 1, 8, 15 + Placebo Days 1, 15 (n = 335) Treat until PD or intolerable toxicity • Primary endpoint: OS • Secondary endpoints: PFS, ORR, TTP Wilke H, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1224-1235 BSC +/- Ram Median OS (mo) Paclitaxel +/- Ram BSC BSC + Ram Paclitaxel Paclitaxel + Ram 3.8 5.2 7.4 9.6 HR: 0.776 (95% CI: 0.603-0.998; P=.0473) Median PFS (mo) ORR (%) HR: 0.807 (95% CI: 0.678-0.962; P = .0169) 1.3 2.1 2.9 4.4 3 3 16 28 Casak SJ, et al. Clin Cancer Res 2015;21:3372-3376 RAINFALL Trial Capecitabine/5-FU + Cisplatin ± Ramucirumab First line mEGA ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02314117. What about Immunotherapy? KEYNOTE-012: Gastric Cancer Cohort Yung-Jue Bang et al. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 4001) Maximum Percentage Change From Baseline in Tumor Sizea (RECIST v1.1, Central Review) Yung-Jue Bang et al. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 4001) Not Quite Ready for Prime Time • Pembrolizumab - pIb (restricted to PD-L1 overexpressing) • • • • Toxicity – Nothing new 22% ORR Median duration of response = 10mo Median OS = 11mo • Avelumab - unselected 2nd line mEGA • 15% ORR; 50% disease control rate; mPFS = ~4mo • Ongoing studies (phase I, II and III) w/ single and double checkpoint inhibitors in EGA Yung-Jue Bang et al. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 4001) Chung HC et al. J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 4S; abstr 167) Gastroesophageal Update Summary • New approval for Ramucirumab alone or in combination with paclitaxel in second-line mEGA • Immunomodulators look promising, but not home run • More studies are ongoing • Don’t forget to confirm HER2 status of patient’s tumor • Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy Systemic Therapy Options (PDAC) Study Treatment Control Patients Median OS (n=total) (mo) 1-year OS p-value (%) (median OS) Burris III HA Gem Gem+erlotinib Gem+ nab-paclitaxel 5FU Gem Gem 126 569 861 5.6 vs 4.4 6.2 vs 5.9 8.5 vs 6.7 18 vs 2 0.0025 23 vs 17 0.038 35 vs 22 <0.001 FOLFIRINOX Gem 342 11.1 vs 6.8 48 vs 20 <0.001 NCI Canada Von Hoff DD PRODIGE Intergroup 20 years of “Progress” Burris HA, et al. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2403-2413 Moore MJ, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1960-1966 Von Hoff DD, et al. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1691-1703 Conroy T, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817-1825 Systemic Therapy Options (PDAC) Study Treatment Control Patients Median OS (n=total) (mo) 1-year OS p-value (%) (median OS) Burris III HA Gem Gem+erlotinib Gem+ nab-paclitaxel 5FU Gem Gem 126 569 861 5.6 vs 4.4 6.2 vs 5.9 8.5 vs 6.7 18 vs 2 0.0025 23 vs 17 0.038 35 vs 22 <0.001 FOLFIRINOX Gem 342 11.1 vs 6.8 48 vs 20 <0.001 NCI Canada Von Hoff DD PRODIGE Intergroup 20 years of “Progress” Burris HA, et al. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2403-2413 Moore MJ, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1960-1966 Von Hoff DD, et al. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1691-1703 Conroy T, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817-1825 My Summary of Metastatic PCa Gemcitabine Gem + nab Pac FOLFIRINOX My Summary of Metastatic PCa Gemcitabine Gem + nab Pac FOLFIRINOX 6mo 9mo 12mo My Summary of Metastatic PCa Gemcitabine Gem + nab Pac FOLFIRINOX 6mo 9mo 12mo PS <2 PS <1 PS 0 My Summary of Metastatic PCa Gemcitabine + Erlotinib 6mo (unless rash ~9) PS <2 Gemcitabine Gem + nab Pac FOLFIRINOX 6mo 9mo 12mo PS <2 PS <1 PS 0 Then What…. • Most patients will only see one line of treatment • For those that are fit, there are several options: • Clinical trial • Use what you didn’t use in first line • OR….. Nanoliposomal irinotecan (MM-398) w/ 5-FU/LV NCCN guidelines. v1.2016 Wang-Gillam A, el al. Lancet 2016;387(10018):545-57 NAPOLI-1: Phase III Second-line mPCa Nanoliposomal formulation increases half-life/AUC preferentially increases tumor exposure to irinotecan (SN-38) Pts with metastatic pancreatic cancer who progressed on gemcitabinebased therapy, KPS ≥ 70 (N = 417) Nal-IRI 120 mg/m2 q3w (n = 151) Nal-IRI 80 mg/m2 + 5-FU/LV* 2400/400 mg/m2 q2w (n = 117) 5-FU/LV 2000/200 mg/m2/wk x 4 q6w (n = 119) Wang-Gillam A, el al. Lancet 2016;387(10018):545-57 Median OS 6.1 vs. 4.2mo Median PFS 3.1 vs. 1.5mo Wang-Gillam A, el al. Lancet 2016;387(10018):545-57 Wang-Gillam A, el al. Lancet 2016;387(10018):545-57 Adjuvant Trials On Horizon With appreciation to M. Tempero Pancreatic Update Summary • Still continue to struggle with development of REALLY effective systemic therapies • Immunotherapies? – combinations will be required • 1st AND 2nd line systemic treatment options are now supported by data • Will have data soon on the value of moving multiagent treatments to earlier stages of disease Colorectal Cancer • Prevention is the best treatment • 80% by 2018 screening national initiative • FIT testing now recommended over FOBT • Don’t do the following…. Bouvard V, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1599-600 Colorectal Cancer An interesting potential Do… 4 cups/day was associated with reduced recurrence and mortality (HR 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.91; P=0.002) Guercio B, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 1;33(31):3598-607 Colorectal Cancer Another interesting potential Do… Clinical trial in mCRC measuring and treating w/ VitD as adjunct to chemo is ongoing Ng K, et al. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 3503) Colorectal Cancer • Another interesting potential Do… A definite DO… Clinical trial in mCRC measuring and treating w/ VitD as adjunct to chemo is ongoing Cao Y, et al., JAMA Oncol. 2016 Mar 3. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.6396 Rectal Cancer in 2015 • TCGA data confirm rectal and colon are same disease – just differ geographically • Trimodality therapy is SOC for stage II and III disease • Pre-op chemoRT (CIVI 5FU or Capecitabine) • Lap-assisted is non-inferior to open resection • Systemic therapy is recommended regardless of pathology after CRT • THE FOCUS of active NCI clinical trials is now modality “relevancy” in the context of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy NCCN guidelines 1.2016 Allegra CJ, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep 14;107(11) Stevenson AR, et al., JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1356-63 Rectal Cancer in 2016 & onward Using neoadjuvant chemotherapy to test …. • Selective incorporation of novel chemo or radiotherapy sensitizers to drive up pCR (NRG “TNT Trial”; NCT#Pending) • Selective elimination of radiotherapy (ALLIANCE PROSPECT; NCT01515787) • Selective elimination of surgery (“Watch and Wait” trials; NCT02008656) NCCN guidelines 1.2016 mCRC Treatment Sequencing Still awaiting updates to CALGB 80405 Venook AP, et al. J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr LBA3) mCRC First line therapy: Dealer’s Choice Venook AP, et al. J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr LBA3) Definition of RAS Mutation ASCO Provisional Clinical Opinion Update 2015 Allegra CJ, et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:2091-2096 Allegra CJ, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 10;34(2):179-85 Then What…. • Most patients will see multiple lines of palliative treatments • For those that are fit, there are several options: • Clinical trial • Use what you didn’t use in first line • Regorafenib or alternative anti-VEGF therapies • OR….. TAS-102 NCCN guidelines. v2.2016 Mayer RJ, el al. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 14;372(20):1909-19 Oral combination of trifluridine and tipiracil • Trifluridine is a fluoropyrimidine which inhibits TS • Tipiracil interferes with the deactivation of trifluridine • 35mg/m2 PO BID D1-5, D8-12 q28 days • TAS-102 vs. Placebo in 800 patients • Had to have previously been treated w/ FP, oxali, iri, bev +/anti-EGFR • Well balanced arms • Primary endpoint = OS Mayer RJ, el al. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 14;372(20):1909-19 Mayer RJ, el al. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 14;372(20):1909-19 Mayer RJ, el al. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 14;372(20):1909-19 Median OS 7.1 vs 5.3mo HR 0.68; P<0.001 Median PFS 2 vs 1.7 mo HR for progression at 6mo 0.48; P<0.001 Mayer RJ, el al. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 14;372(20):1909-19 Not Capecitabine Mayer RJ, el al. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 14;372(20):1909-19 Mayer RJ, el al. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 14;372(20):1909-19 How to incorporate? • No head to head comparisons w/ Regorafenib • Activity: Equitable • Tolerability: TAS-102 > Regorafenib • Two options: • • • • Use Rego first – since you know benefit is tied to tolerance Use TAS-102 first – since you may not get another shot Extended survival is related to seeing all active agents Sequencing studies are coming…. What about Immunotherapy? MMR-Deficient CRC Baseline Characteristics (n = 13) MMR-Proficient CRC (n = 25) MMR-Deficient Other Tumors (n = 10) Median age, yrs 46 62 59 Diagnosis, % CRC Ampullary/biliary Endometrial Small bowel Prostate Gastric 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 20 20 10 10 ≥ 2 prior therapies, % 100 100 90 Lynch syndrome, % ORR 85 62 0 0 40 60 Disease control rate 92 16 70 Le DT, el al. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 14;372(20):2509-20 Le DT, el al. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 14;372(20):2509-20 • Ongoing studies to confirm benefit including 1st line Pembro vs. chemo (KEYNOTE-177; NCT02563002) in MSI-H or MMR-D mCRC • Additional combinations with diff agents/chemo ongoing • MSI testing should be performed on ALL patients w/ mCRC • Identification of family syndrome in absence of + FH • Biomarker for immunotherapy consideration NCCN guidelines. v2.2016 Summary • New agents in refractory EGA, pancreatic and CRC have come into clinical practice • Moving them earlier in treatment is high priority • Upcoming results of perioperative trials in pancreatic and rectal cancers could be clinical practice game changers • Immunotherapy is gaining relevancy in GI cancers • Personalized treatment decisions continue to be refined by patient selection • Extended RAS testing (negative predictive biomarker) • MSI-H/MMR-D testing (positive predictive biomarker) • HER2 testing (positive predictive biomarker) Thank you @TGeorgeMD | [email protected]