Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Universal Elimination Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College Overview • What is Universal Elimination? – A commonsense example – The official definition • Examples What is Universal Elimination? • From a generalization, infer an instance of that generalization. – Ex. Everybody is happy. So John is happy. – Ex. All birds are mortal. Tweety is a bird. So Tweety is mortal. • Perhaps the most basic of our four basic inference rules in predicate logic. The examples examined • Ex. Everybody is happy. So John is happy.xHx ├ Hj 1. xHx 2. Hj • A 1 E Ex. All birds are mortal. Tweety is a bird. So Tweety is mortal. x(Bx→Mx), Bt ├ Mt 1. 2. 3. 4. x(Bx→Mx) Bt Bt→Mt Mt A A 1 E 2,3 →E The official definition • Universal Elimination (E): Let Φ be any universally quantified formula and Φ/ be the result of replacing all occurrences of the variable in Φ by some name . Then from Φ, infer Φ/. 1. 2. 3. 4. x(Bx→Mx) Bt Bt→Mt Mt A A 1 E 2,3 →E Some finer points… • When you have multiple quantifiers, you apply E from left to right (outside-in), e.g. – 1. 2. 3. • Everyone loves everyone. So Al loves Bob. xyLxy A yLay 1 E Lab 2 E Note that this is the exact opposite direction as I. Another finer point… • • 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Be strategic in which name you instantiate when using E. Example: Either Al or Ben is the winner. All winners must have passed the qualifying round. Ben did not. So Al is the winner. Wa v Wb A x(WxQx) A ~Qb A Imprudent. Wa Qa 2 E WbQb ~Wb 3,4MT Wa 1,5 DS Samples: Nolt 8.3.1.1 ├ xFx → Fa 1. | xFx 2. | Fa 3. xFx→Fa H for →I 1 E 1-2 →I 8.3.1.4 x(Fx→Gx), Ga→Ha ├ Fa →Ha 1. x(Fx→Gx) A 2. Ga→Ha A 3. Fa→Ga 1 E 4. Fa→Ha 2,3 HS 8.3.1.7 x(Fx→Gx), x~Gx ├ x~Fx 1. x(Fx→Gx) A 2. x~Gx A 3. |~Ga H for E 4. |Fa→Ga 1 E 5. |~Fa 3,4 MT 6. |x~Fx 5 I 7. x~Fx 2,3-6 E 8.3.1.8 x(Fx→Gx), ~xGx ├ ~xFx 1. x(Fx→Gx) 2. ~xGx 3. |xFx 4. | |Fa 5. | |Fa→Ga 6. | |Ga 7. 7. || |xGx | xGx 8. 8. ||xGx |P&~P 9. ||xGx P&~P& ~xGx 10.~xFx 10. ~xFx (Alternative Proof) A A H for ~I H for E 1 E 4,5→E 6 I 6I 3,4-7 E 2,7 EFQ 2,9 &IE 3,4-8 3-9 ~I 8.3.1.10 • • • • • • • • xFx v xGx, ~Ga ├ xFx 1. xFx v xGx 2. ~Ga 3. |xGx 4. |Ga 5. |Ga & ~Ga 6. ~xGx 7. xFx A A H for ~I 3 E 2,5 &I 3-5 ~I 1,6 DS