Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Systematic Search for Background Seismicity Rate Changes and Correlations at Alaskan Volcanoes K.R. Kore, S.R. McNutt, and D.H. Christensen Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks Overview and Goals Strain Rate Seismicity Rate i i Identify background seismicity rate changes Temporally correlate “events” between volcanoes along the Aleutian Arc Speculate as to the cause of the “events” The Alaskan Volcanoes Spurr Katmai Aniakchak Pavlof Shishaldi n Akutan Veniaminof Okmok Westdah Dutton Makushin l Strandline Lake Redoub Iliamnat Augustin e Wrangell Identification of Rate Changes Estimate minimum magnitude of completeness Exclude swarms & eruptions Perform AS(t) function of the z-test with min. 3 mo. rate Exclude manmade changes Volcanoes with Rate Changes Spurr Strandline Lake Wrangell Redoub Iliamna t Augustine Katmai Aniakchak ShishaldinPavlof Veniaminof Akutan Okmok Dutton Westdahl Makushin 12 of 16 Volcanoes Length of Monitoring Time Activity/ Sensitivity Level 1990.00 1990.50 1991.00 1991.50 1992.00 1992.50 1993.00 1993.50 1994.00 1994.50 1995.00 1995.50 1996.00 1996.50 1997.00 1997.50 1998.00 1998.50 1999.00 1999.50 2000.00 2000.50 2001.00 2001.50 2002.00 2002.50 2003.00 2003.50 2004.00 Cumulative Number of Events Mount Spurr 3000 2500 2000 1500 Eruption 1000 500 0 Time (years) Coincident “Events” Ho: All volcanic events are random and independent 95% Confidence Level 10,000 synthetic catalogs per time window Random generation of events Probability of occurrence Early 1996 Events Redoubt 5/11 Augustin e 2/19 Akutan 3/10 Iliamna 5/8 120 Day window P=0.004 Iliamna increases, Redoubt and Augustine decrease Akutan- swarm Regional earthquakes: Adak June 9th – 10th (M7.9, M7.2) Late 1996 Events Strandline Lake 8/31 Spurr 10/11 Katmai 10/16 Pavlof 9/16 Amukta 9/18 Augustin e 9/25 60 Day window P=0.0001 Strandline, Katmai: swarms Pavlof: eruption Augustine increase, Spurr decrease Amukta eruption Speculated Slow Slip Event (McNutt and Marzocchi, 2004) 1998 Events 60 Day window P=0.0148 All rate decreases Plume from Spurr 3/28 Lake Becharof/ Ukinrek Maars swarm 5/8-5/9 Slow Slip Event, Cook Inlet - Late 1998 (Ohta et al., 2004) Strandline Lake 3/28 Lake Becharof Spurr 4/2 Redoubt 5/1 2002 Events 10/23 M6.7 60 Day window P=0.0206 All rate decreases Denali Fault Earthquake Sequence: Oct. 23rd Nov. 3rd 11/03 M7.9 Wrangell 11/17 Strandline Lake 10/29 Spurr 10/25 The Four Cases Early 1996: Akutan, Iliamna, Redoubt, Augustine: 120 Day Window, P=0.004 Late 1996: Spurr, Strandline Lake, Augustine, Katmai, Pavlof: 60 Day Window, P=0.0001 1998: Strandline Lake, Spurr, Redoubt: 60 Day Window, P=0.0148 2002: Wrangell, Strandline Lake, Spurr: 60 Day Window, P=0.0206 Conclusions and Speculations Probabilities of independent volcanoes having events close in time tend to be low. This suggests that the volcanoes are reacting to regional events which change the stresses governing the volcanoes, such as: Regional Earthquakes Slow Slip Events Other more subtle stress changes