Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
GMO’s A risk assessment of genetical modification in food,clothes and biofuel production M. Monroe, K. Grond, P. Skoglund Svanberg M. Monroe,&K.E.Grond, P. Skoglund & E. Svanberg Introduction • GMO = genes added to genome of organism through transformation • GM used in: – Food/clothes -> crops + animals – Biofuel -> crops + bacteria • Benefits / Risks – Ecology – Human health M. Monroe, K. Grond, P. Skoglund & E. Svanberg Use GM increasing M. Monroe, K. Grond, P. Skoglund & E. Svanberg Objectives • Discuss: – Advantages/disadvantages GM in: • Food/Clothes • Biofuel – Ecological consequences • Not discussing: – Animals – Ethics M. Monroe, K. Grond, P. Skoglund & E. Svanberg Ideal GMO Features: – No hybridisation – Contained expression – Vector removal – Harmless gene product – Stable genetic construct M. Monroe, K. Grond, P. Skoglund & E. Svanberg • Hybridization – Non-transgenic field population – wild population – cross species • Requirements: – Flowering time – Close – Genetic compatibility M. Monroe, K. Grond, P. Skoglund & E. Svanberg Relative risk of cross-pollination from crops to wild relatives High risk: Low risk: Minimal risk: Sugar beet White clover Scots pine Apple Rye grass Lucerne Poplar Cabbage Carrot Plum Oilseed rape Potato Wheat Tomato Maize Broad bean Pea Cucumber Sunflower Spruce Grapes Strawberry Douglas fir Flax Barley Blackcurrant Lettuce Raspberry M. Monroe, K. Grond, P. Skoglund & E. Svanberg Benefits GMO’s • • • • • • Reduces costs/illness caused by pesticides Higher yield Higher nutritional value Protection against insect damage Reduction in agricultural land Conservation of resources through less use of labour, fuel, fertilizer and water • Water quality protection • Protection against plant diseases M. Monroe, K. Grond, P. Skoglund & E. Svanberg biofuels • Crops – Oilseed rape – Soya bean – Wheat – Tree biomass • Bacteria – Clostridium acetobutylicum • Fermentation substrates • Enclosed in factory -> risk of spilling M. Monroe, K. Grond, P. Skoglund & E. Svanberg Negative ecological effects • Insect resistance to toxin producing plants • Slow down evolution • Species interaction a complex matter • Fewer species -> higher dependence M. Monroe, K. Grond, P. Skoglund & E. Svanberg