Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
State of Cancer Report 2008: Relay For Life Mark Clanton,MD, MPH Chief Medical Officer High Plains Division American Cancer Society Trends in Actual Number of Cancer Deaths and Age-adjusted Cancer Death Rates, 1970-2005 220 Number of deaths 215 210 500,000 205 400,000 200 195 190 Death rate 300,000 185 200,000 180 100,000 175 170 0 165 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 Year of death 1995 2000 2005 Rate per 100,000 Number of cancer deaths 600,000 Total Number of Cancer Deaths Avoided from 1991 to 2004 in men and 1992 to 2004 in Women Men 360000 340000 340000 408,400 Cancer deaths 300000 160000 160000 0 0 Year of death Year of death The blue line represents the actual cancer deaths recorded in each year and the red line represents the expected number of cancer deaths if cancer mortality rates had remained the same since 1991/1992. 2004 180000 2000 180000 1995 200000 1990 200000 1985 220000 2004 220000 2000 240000 1995 240000 1990 260000 1985 260000 1980 280000 1975 280000 136,100 Cancer deaths 1980 300000 320000 1975 320000 Number of deaths Women 360000 Breast and Colon Cancer Access to Care and Health Insurance Trends in Female Breast Cancer Death Rates by Race and Ethnicity, US, 1975-2004 45 40 African Americans Rate per 100,000 35 30 Whites 25 Hispanic/Latina 20 American Indian/Alaska Native 15 10 Asian American/Pacific Islander 5 0 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2004 Year American Cancer Society, Surveillance Research, 2007 Adjusted Breast Cancer Survival by Stages and Insurance Status, among Patients Diagnosed in 1999-2000 and Reported to the NCDB Mammogram Within the Last Year in Adult Women, ages 40-64, by Years of Education and Insurance Status, NHIS 2005 All Races combined 70 60 Insured 50 % 40 Uninsured 30 20 10 0 0-11 12 13-15 16+ Source: National Health Interview Survey 2005, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006. U.S. Colorectal Cancer Mortality 1975-2005 40.0 35.0 25.0 Blalck Male WhiteMale 20.0 Black Female White Female 15.0 10.0 5.0 2005 2003 2001 1999 1997 1995 1993 1991 1989 1987 1985 1983 1981 1979 1977 0.0 1975 Rate per 100,000 30.0 Adjusted Colorectal Cancer Survival by Stages and Insurance Status, among Patients Diagnosed in 1999-2000 and Reported to the NCDB Colorectal Cancer Screening*, in Adults, ages 5064, by Years of Education and Insurance Status, NHIS 2005 All Races combined 70 60 50 Insured % 40 30 20 Uninsured 10 0 0-11 12 13-15 16+ *Either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or an endoscopy within the past ten years. Source: National Health Interview Survey 2005, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006. How Can We Provide Adequate High Quality Care (to Include Preventive Care) to a Population That Has So Often Not Received It? Dr. Otis Brawley Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer, National Home Office, American Cancer Society 82 80 3500 79 3000 78 2500 77 2000 76 1500 1000 75 500 74 0 Life Expectancy – Per Capita Spending 2006 CIA FACTBOOK Per Capita Spending in USD S J a n ap a M n a M rin S on o w a itz co er A l an us d tr S alia w ed Ic en el A and nd o C rra an a F r da an ce Ita A ly us tri S a pa N in S orw in a ga y po Lu I re s x r N em a e l ew bo Z u N ea rg et la he n rl d G and er s m a G ny re ec e M B alta el gi U u ni te Fin m d Ki lan ng d d U De om ni nm te d ar St k at e C s ub C a yp r Ire us l a P nd or tu ga l Average Life Expectancy (years) Higher Per Capita Spending in the U.S. does not Translate into Longer Life Expectancy The Cost of a Long Life United States 5000 81 4500 4000 Future Science and Pancreatic Cancer • Incidence rates of pancreatic cancer have been stable in men since 1993 and in women since 1983. • An estimated 34,290 deaths are expected to occur in 2008. • At present, there is no method for the early detection of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Facts & Figures 2008, American Cancer Society Nanotechnology Imaging Quantum Dots Technology These tiny quantum dots are typically made from semiconductor crystals or cadmium selenide encased in a zinc sulfide shell as small as one nanometer (onebillionth of a meter). These dots can zero in with pinpoint accuracy on human prostate cancer. In ultraviolet light, each dot radiates a brilliant color. Not in clinical use (exposure to cadmium can be hazardous), but are used as markers to tag particles of interest in the laboratory. Source:Nature Biotechnology ハ22, 969 - 976 (2004) Published online: 18 July 2004; |In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dotsXiaohu Gao1, Yuanyuan Cui2, Richard M Levenson3, Leland W K Chung2 &ハShuming Nie1 Emerging Technology and Pancreatic Cancer • Improving the survival rates for pancreatic cancer require early diagnosis and targeted therapy • Nanotechnology may facilitate: – Targeted treatment of primary pancreatic cancer – Advanced imaging technology critical for near term improvements in early detection and diagnosis. Advanced Imaging • Imaging Pancreatic Cancer Using Surface-Functionalized Quantum Dots • Artificially engineered magnetic nanoparticles for ultra-sensitive molecular imaging Imaging Pancreatic Cancer Using SurfaceFunctionalized Quantum Dots • In this study, CdSe/CdS/ZnS quantum dots (QDs) were used as optical contrast agent for imaging pancreatic cancer cells in vitro using transferrin and antiClaudin-4 as targeting ligands. • Pancreatic cancer specific uptake is also demonstrated using the monoclonal antibody anti-Claudin-4. • This targeted QD platform will be further modified for the purpose of developing as an early detection imaging tool for pancreatic cancer.PDAC. QuickTime™ and a decompress or are needed to see this picture. Imaging Panceratic Cancer Using Surface Functionalized Quantum Dots, Jun Qian, Ken-Tye Yong,Indrajit Roy,Tymish Y. Ohulchanskyy, Earl J. Bergey, Hoon Hi Lee, Kenneth M. Tramposch,Sailing He, Anirban Maitra and Paras N. Prasad. J. Phys. Chem.B, 111(25), 6969-6972, 2007. 10.1021/jp070620n. Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society. Web release: June 7,2007 Artificially engineered magnetic nanoparticles for ultra-sensitive molecular imaging • Successful development of ultra-sensitive molecular imaging nanoprobes for the detection of targeted biological objects is a challenging task. • Here we used artificial engineering approaches to develop innovative magnetic nanoprobes • These magnetism-engineered iron oxide (MEIO) nanoprobes, when conjugated with antibodies, showed enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sensitivity for the detection of cancer markers compared with probes currently available. • Also, we successfully visualized small tumors implanted in a mouse. Artificially engineered magnetic nanoparticles for ultra-sensitive molecular imaging Jae-Hyun Lee1,4, Yong-Min Huh2,4, Young-wook Jun1, Jung-wook Seo1, Jung-tak Jang1, Ho-Taek Song2, Sungjun Kim2, Eun-Jin Cho2, Ho-Geun Yoon3, Jin-Suck Suh2 & Jinwoo Cheon1. Nature Medicine 13, 95 - 99 (2006) Published online: 24 December 2006 | doi:10.1038/nm1467 Artificially engineered magnetic nanoparticles for ultra-sensitive molecular • Nano particles enhance MRI QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Artificially engineered magnetic nanoparticles for ultra-sensitive molecular imaging Jae-Hyun Lee1,4, Yong-Min Huh2,4, Young-wook Jun1, Jung-wook Seo1, Jung-tak Jang1, Ho-Taek Song2, Sungjun Kim2, Eun-Jin Cho2, Ho-Geun Yoon3, Jin-Suck Suh2 & Jinwoo Cheon1. Nature Medicine 13, 95 - 99 (2006) Published online: 24 December 2006 | doi:10.1038/nm1467 Nanotechnology based therapy for Pancreatic Cancer Non-invasive targeted radiofrequency cancer therapy Gold Nanoparticles QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. A scanning tunneling microscope image of 5 nm gold nanoparticles http://www.chem.utoronto.ca/staff/DHIRANI/index.htm Non-invasive targeted radiofrequency cancer therapy • Our preliminary studies here indicate that GNPs added to the media of human cancer cells in vitro are taken up and localized in vesicles in the cytoplasm of the cells. • Panc-1 and Hep3B cells were utilized for all experiments (American Type Culture Collection, Bethesda, Maryland, USA • The presence of these GNP-laden vesicles has no apparent cytotoxic or antiproliferative effect on the cells. • Furthermore, GNPs exposed to an external, non-invasive 13.56 MHz RF field release significant amounts of heat, in fact often sufficient to raise water temperatures to the boiling point. • Exposing GNP-bearing human cancer cells to this external RF field in vitro produced dose-dependent lethal injury in > 96% of the cells. • Based on these promising results, we have initiated studies to evaluate in vitro cytotoxicities of GNPs and methods to target the GNPs to tumors in vivo to affect RFinduced thermal destruction of malignant tumors. Intracellular gold nanoparticles enhance non-invasive radiofrequency thermal destruction of human gastrointestinal cancer cellsChristopher J Gannon1 , Chitta Ranjan Patra2 , Resham Bhattacharya2 , Priyabrata Mukherjee2 and Steven A Curley1, Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2008, 6:2doi:10.1186/1477-3155-6-2The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jnanobiotechnology.com/content/6/1/2 There is so much more to do! Go Get’em Relay For Life!