Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chapter 5 Applying Consumer theory Topics • Deriving Demand Curves. • How Changes in Income Shift Demand Curves. • Effects of a Price Change. • Cost-of-Living Adjustments. • Deriving Labor Supply Curves. 5-2 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Budget Line, L W= Y PW Wine, (W), Gallons per year Figure 5.1 Deriving an Individual’s Demand Curve (a) Indifference Curves and Budget Constraints Pb b PW 12.0 e1 2.8 0 5-3 26.7 (b) Demand Curve Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Beer (b), Gallons per year Initial optimal bundle of beer and wine pb, $ per unit Initial Values Pb = price of beer = $12 PW = price of wine = $35 Y = Income = $419. I1 L1 (pb = $12) 12.0 E1 0 26.7 Beer (b), Gallons per year Budget Line, L Wine, (W), Gallons per year Figure 5.1 Deriving an Individual’s Demand Curve (a) Indifference Curves and Budget Constraints 12.0 e2 4.3 W= Y PW Pb b PW e1 2.8 I2 0 26.7 44.5 L2 (pb = $6) Beer (b), Gallons per year (b) Demand Curve pb, $ per unit New Values Pb = price of beer = $6 PW = price of wine = $35 Y = Income = $419. I1 L1 (p b = $12) 12.0 E1 E2 6.0 Price of beer goes down! 0 5-4 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. 26.7 44.5 Beer (b), Gallons per year Budget Line, L Wine, (W), Gallons per year Figure 5.1 Deriving an Individual’s Demand Curve (a) Indifference Curves and Budget Constraints 12.0 e3 5.2 e2 4.3 W= Y PW Pb b PW 2.8 I2 I1 L1 (pb = $12) 26.7 44.5 L2 (pb = $6) 58.9 L3 (pb = $4) Beer (b), Gallons per year pb, $ per unit (b) Demand Curve 12.0 E1 E2 6.0 Price of beer goes down again! Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. E3 4.0 0 5-5 I3 e1 0 New Values Pb = price of beer = $4 PW = price of wine = $35 Y = Income = $419. Price-consumption curve 26.7 44.5 58.9 D1, Demand for Beer Beer (b), Gallons per year Price-Consumption Curve • A line through optimal bundles at each price of one good (beer) when the price of the other good (wine) and the budget are held constant. • The demand curve corresponds to the price-consumption curve. 5-6 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Solved Problem 5.1 • In Figure 5.1, how does Mimi’s utility at E1 on D1 compare to that at E2? • Answer: Use the relationship between the points in panels a and b of Figure 5.1 to determine how Mimi’s utility varies across these points on the demand curve. 5-7 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Solved Problem 5.2 • Mahdu views Coke, q, and Pepsi as perfect substitutes: He is indifferent as to which one he drinks. The price of a 12ounce can of Coke is p, the price of a 12ounce can of Pepsi is p* and his weekly cola budget is Y. Derive Mahdu’s demand curve for Coke using the method illustrated in Figure 5.1. 5-8 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Solved Problem 5.2 (cont.) 5-9 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Effects of a Rise in Income • Engel curve - the relationship between the quantity demanded of a single good and income, holding prices constant. • Income-consumption curve shows how consumption of both goods changes when income changes, while prices are held constant. 5 - 10 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Wine, Gallons per year Figure 5.2 Effect of a Budget Increase on an Individual’s Demand Curve L1 2.8 Budget Line, L Initial Values Pb = price of beer = $12 PW = price of wine = $35 $628 Y = Income = $419. Income goes up! Price of beer, $ per unit Pb b PW 12 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Beer, Gallons per year E1 D1 0 Y1 = $419 0 5 - 11 26.7 I1 26.7 Beer, Gallons per year Y, Budget W= Y PW 0 e1 E1* 26.7 Beer, Gallons per year Wine, Gallons per year Figure 5.2 Effect of a Budget Increase on an Individual’s Demand Curve L2 L1 4.8 2.8 Budget Line, L Initial Values Pb = price of beer = $12 PW = price of wine = $35 $628 Y = Income = $419. Income goes up! Price of beer, $ per unit Pb b PW 12 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. 26.7 38.2 E1 I2 Beer, Gallons per year E2 D2 D1 0 26.7 38.2 Y2 = $628 Y1 = $419 0 5 - 12 I1 Beer, Gallons per year Y, Budget W= Y PW 0 e2 e1 E2* E1* 26.7 38.2 Beer, Gallons per year Wine, Gallons per year Figure 5.2 Effect of a Budget Increase on an Individual’s Demand Curve L3 L2 L1 7.1 4.8 2.8 Budget Line, L Pb b PW Initial Values Pb = price of beer = $12 PW = price of wine = $35 Y = Income = $837. Price of beer, $ per unit 0 12 e2 e1 I1 26.7 38.2 49.1 E1 E2 0 26.7 38.2 49.1 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Beer, Gallons per year Y1 = $419 Beer, Gallons per year Engel curve for beer E3* Y2 = $628 0 5 - 13 I3 D3 D2 D1 Y3 = $837 Income goes up again! I2 E3 Y, Budget W= Y PW Income-consumption curve e3 E2* E1* 26.7 38.2 49.1 Beer, Gallons per year Solved Problem 5.3 • Mahdu views Coke and Pepsi as perfect substitutes. The price of a 12-ounce can of Coke, p, is less than the price of a 12ounce can of Pepsi, p*. What does Mahdu’s Engel curve for Coke look like? How much does his weekly cola budget have to rise for Mahdu to buy one more can of Coke per week? 5 - 14 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Solved Problem 5.3 5 - 15 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Consumer Theory and Income Elasticities • Formally, Q %Q Q Y Q x %Y Y Y Q Y where Y stands for income. • Example If a 1% increase in income results in a 3% decrease in quantity demanded, the income elasticity of demand is x = -3%/1% = -3. 5 - 16 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Consumer Theory and Income Elasticities (cont.) • Normal good - a commodity of which as much or more is demanded as income rises. Positive income elasticity. • Inferior good - a commodity of which less is demanded as income rises. Negative income elasticity. 5 - 17 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Housing, Squarefeet per year Figure 5.3 Income-Consumption Curves and Income Elasticities • As income rises the budget constraint shifts to the right. Food inferior, housing normal L2 ICC 1 a Food normal, housing normal ICC 2 • …where on the new budget constraint the new optimal consumption bundle will be b L1 The income elasticities depend on…. e c ICC 3 Food normal, housing inferior I Food, Pounds peryear 5 - 18 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. …she bought more hamburger • But as she became wealthier and her income rose… ….she bought less hamburger and more steak. 5 - 19 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. All other goods per year • When Gail was poor and her income increased.. (a) Indifference Curves and Budget Constraints Y3 L3 Y2 Income-consumption curve L2 e3 1 Y1 L I3 e2 e1 I2 I1 Hamburger peryear (b) Engel Curve Y, Income Figure 5.4 A Good That Is Both Inferior and Normal Y3 E3 Y2 E2 Engel curve Y1 E1 Hamburger peryear Effects of a Price Change • Substitution effect - the change in the quantity of a good that a consumer demands when the good’s price changes, holding other prices and the consumer’s utility constant. • Income effect - the change in the quantity of a good a consumer demands because of a change in income, holding prices constant. 5 - 20 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Figure 5.5 Substitution and Income Effects with Normal Goods Budget Line, L1 C= Y1 PC - 1 PF 1 PC 1 F Budget Line, L2 (increase in salary) C= Y2 PC 2 - PF 2 PC 2 PC PF 1 5 - 21 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. F 1 Basketball, Tickets per year Figure 5.6 Giffen Good When the price of movie tickets decreases the budget constraint rotates out… L2 e2 L1 I2 e1 Total effect Nevertheless, the total effect is negative. WHY? 5 - 22 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. allowing the consumer to increase her utility. I1 Movies, Tickets per year Basketball, Tickets per year Figure 5.6 Giffen Good • Even though the substitution effect is positive…. L2 …the income effect is larger and negative (since this is an inferior good). e2 L1 I2 L* e1 e* Total effect Substitution effect Income effect 5 - 23 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. I1 Movies, Tickets per year Inflation Indexes • Inflation - the increase in the overall price level over time. nominal price - the actual price of a good. real price - the price adjusted for inflation. • How do we adjust for inflation to calculate the real price? 5 - 24 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Inflation Indexes (cont.) • Consumer Price Index (CPI) – measure the cost of a standard bundle of goods for use in comparing prices over time. We can use the CPI to calculate the real price of a hamburger over time. In terms of 2008 dollars, the real price of a hamburger in 1955 was: CPI for 2008 211.1 price of a burger 15 1.18 CPI for 2005 26.8 5 - 25 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Effects of Inflation Adjustments • Scenario: Klaas signed a long-term contract when he was hired. According to the COLA clause in his contract, his employer increases his salary each year by the same percentage as that by which the CPI increases. If the CPI this year is 5% higher than the CPI last year, Klaas’s salary rises automatically by 5% over last year’s. • Question: what is the difference between using the CPI to adjust the long-term contract and using a true cost-of-living adjustment, which holds utility constant? 5 - 26 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. C, Units of clothing pe year Figure 5.7 The Consumer Price Index Budget Line, L1 Y1/pC1 Y2 /pC2 C1 e1 But is Thesince firm Klaas ensures better off, the that Klaas canCPI buy adjustment the same bundle of overcompensates goods in the second for thethat change in year he chose inflation in the first year… C= Y1 PC - 1 F 1 1 Pc Budget Line, L2 (increase in salary) C= Y2 PC - 2 PF 2 Pc 2 PC PF e2 C2 PF 1 I2 I1 L1 F1 F2 Y1/pF1 L2 Y2/pF2 F, Units offood peryear 5 - 27 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. F 1 True Cost-of-Living Adjustment • True cost-of-living index - an inflation index that holds utility constant over time. • Question: how big an increase in Klaas’s salary would leave him exactly as well off in the second year as in the first? 5 - 28 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. C, Units of clothing per year True Cost-of-Living Adjustment Budget Line, L1 C= Y1/pC1 Y1 PC C1 1 F 1 1 Pc Budget Line, L2 (increase in salary) Y2 /pC2 Y*/pC2 - PF Y2 C= e1 PC - 2 Pc 2 PC PF 1 e2 C2 2 PF F 1 e* I2 I1 L1 F1 F2 Y1/pF1 L* L2 Y2* /pF2 Y2/pF2 F, Units of food per year 5 - 29 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Table 5.1 Cost-of-Living Adjustments 5 - 30 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. CPI Substitution Bias • Income adjustments based on CPI suffer from an upward bias. • The CPI-based adjustment suffers from substitution bias – it ignores that consumers may substitute toward the relatively inexpensive good when prices change disproportionately. 5 - 31 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Labor-Leisure Choice • Leisure - all time spent not working. • The number of hours worked per day, H, equals 24 minus the hours of leisure or nonwork, N, in a day: H = 24 − N. The price of leisure is forgone earnings. • The higher your wage, the more an hour of leisure costs you. 5 - 32 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Labor-Leisure Choice: Example • Jackie spends her total income, Y, on various goods. The price of these goods is $1 per unit. • Her utility, U, depends on how many goods and how much leisure she consumes: U = U(Y, N). • Jackie’s earned income equal: wH. • And her total income, Y, is her earned income plus her unearned income, Y*: Y = wH + Y*. 5 - 33 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. (a) Indifference Curves and Constraints Y , Goods per day Figure 5.8 Demand for Leisure Time constraint I1 Budget Line, L1 L1 –w1 Y = w1H 0 24 w, Wage per hour Y = w1(24 − N). Each extra hour of leisure she consumes costs her w1 goods. e1 N1 = 16 H1 = 8 24 0 N, Leisure hours per day H,Work hours per day (b) Demand Curve E1 w1 0 5 - 34 1 Y1 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. N1 = 16 H1 = 8 N, Leisure hours per day H, Work hours per day Figure 5.8 Demand for Leisure Y, Goods per day (a) Indifference Curves and Constraints Time constraint I2 L2 –w2 1 I1 e2 Y2 Budget Line, L1 L1 –w1 Y = w1H 0 24 Y = w2H Y = w2(24 − N). w, Wage per hour Y = w1(24 − N). Budget Line, L2 1 e1 Y1 N2 = 12 H2 = 12 N1 = 16 H1 = 8 24 0 N, Leisure hours per day H,Work hours per day (b) Demand Curve E2 w2 E1 w1 Demand for leisure w2 > w1 5 - 35 0 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. N2 = 12 H2 = 12 N1 = 16 H1 = 8 N, Leisure hours per day H, Work hours per day Figure 5.9 Supply Curve of Labor 5 - 36 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Y, Goods per d ay Figure 5.10 Income and Substitution Effects of a Wage Change Time const raint I2 L2 Since income effect is positive, leisure is a normal good. I1 L* e2 e* L1 e1 0 N* 24 H* N1 N 2 H1 H2 Substitution effect Total effect Income effect 5 - 37 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. 24 N, Leisure hours per d ay 0 H, Work hours per d ay Solved Problem 5.5 • Enrico receives a no-strings-attached scholarship that pays him an extra Y* per day. How does this scholarship affect the number of hours he wants to work? Does his utility increase? 5 - 38 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Solved Problem 5.5 (cont.) 5 - 39 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Figure 5.11 Labor Supply Curve That Slopes Upward and Then Bends Backward L3 (b) Supply Curve of Labor Time const raint I3 I2 I1 L2 E3 E2 e3 e2 E1 L1 24 Supply curve of labor w, Wage per hour Y, Goods per d ay (a) Labor-Leisure Choice e1 H2 H 3 H1 0 0 H1 H3 H, Work hours per d ay butlow At at high wages, wages, an increase an increase in the in the wage causes the worker to work more…. less…. 5 - 40 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. H2 24 H, Work hours per d ay Figure 5.12 The Relationship of U.S. Tax Revenue and the Marginal Tax Rate 5 - 41 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Figure 5.13 Per-Unit Versus LumpSum Child Care Subsidies 5 - 42 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.