Download Lecture 2 - Social Welfare and Policy Analysis

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Externality wikipedia , lookup

Robin Hood tax wikipedia , lookup

Perfect competition wikipedia , lookup

Pigovian tax wikipedia , lookup

Economic equilibrium wikipedia , lookup

Supply and demand wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Social Welfare and Policy
Analysis
Measuring the Gains from Trade
• Whenever an exchange (or trade) takes place between a
consumer and a producer, both parties gain from that
exchange (or trade)
• The consumer’s gain from the trade is termed as
– The consumer’s surplus
• The producer’s gain from the trade is termed as
– The producer’s surplus
• The sum of the consumer’s and producer’s surplus is the total
gains from a particular trade (or exchange).
Social Surplus or Social Welfare Gains
• Social Surplus or Social Welfare Gains: The sum of the
surpluses from trade of a commodity or service to all
participants (all consumers and producers)
• Social surplus from all exchanges of a commodity occurred
at a particular point in time can be calculated in the same
way, using the aggregate (market) demand and supply
functions (curves)
– Consumers’ surplus is the area of the triangle between the
equilibrium price line and the market demand curve
– Producers’ surplus is the area of the triangle between the
equilibrium price line and the market supply curve
• Social Surplus Gain= Consumers’ Surplus + Producers’
Surplus
Consumers’ Surplus in the Market
Producers’ Surplus in the Market
Social Surplus or Social Welfare Gains
Social Surplus: A Mathematical Application
• Suppose that the market demand function is given by QD = 40 – 2P
and the market supply is given by QS = 2P. What is the social surplus?
• At the market equilibrium, QS = QD
2P = 40 – 2P
=> 4P = 40
=> P = 10
• At this price, equilibrium quantity exchanged is
QS = 2P = 2*10 = 20
• The inverse demand function is P = 20 – (1/2)QD; the height of the
triangle is the intercept of the inverse demand curve minus P, that is
20 – 10 = 10.
CS = ½ (10*20) = 100
• The inverse supply function is P = (1/2)QS; the height of the triangle is
P minus the intercept of the inverse supply curve, that is 10 – 0 = 10.
PS = ½ (10*20) = 100
• The social surplus, W = CS + PS = 100 +100 = 200
Competition Maximizes Welfare
• How should we measure society’s welfare?
• If we agree to weighting the well-being of consumers and
producers equally, then welfare can be measured
W = CS + PS
• Producing the competitive quantity maximizes welfare.
• Put another way, producing less than the competitive level of
output lowers total welfare.
• Deadweight Loss (DWL) is the name for the net reduction in
welfare from the loss of surplus by one group that is not offset
by a gain to another group.
How Competition Maximizes Welfare
• The reason that competition maximizes welfare is that
price equals marginal cost at the competitive equilibrium.
• Consumers value the last unit of output by exactly the
amount that it costs to produce it.
• A market failure is inefficient production or consumption,
often because a prices exceeds marginal cost.
• Example: Deadweight loss of Christmas presents
How Competition Maximizes Welfare
• Reduce output
below competitive
level, Q1 to Q2, lowers
social surplus by the
area (C+E), which
equals DWL.
• Producing more
than the competitive
level of output also
lowers total welfare
(by area B, which
equals DWL).
Policies That Shift Demand and Supply Curves
• Welfare is maximized at the competitive equilibrium
• Government actions can move us away from that competitive
equilibrium
• Thus, welfare analysis can help us predict the impact of various
government programs
• We will examine several policies that shift market demand:
– Change in consumers’ income
– Sales tax collected from the consumers
– Price subsidy
• We will examine several policies that shift supply:
1. Restricting the number of firms
2. Raising entry and exit costs
Policies That Shift Demand Curves
Increase in Consumers’ Income
• Increase in income shifts the demand
curve from D to D1.
Resulting in a change in the
equilibrium price from P1 to P2 and
equilibrium quantity from Q1 to Q2.
• Initial CS = abP1
Later CS = edP2
Not sure if CS increased or decreased.
• Initial PS = cbP1
Later PS = cdP2
Increase in PS
• Initial Total Surplus = abc
Later Total Surplus = edc
An increase in Total Surplus
• Society overall is better off due to an
increase in consumer income.
P
e
S
a
P2
P1
d
b
D1
D
c
Q1
Q2
Q
Policies That Shift Demand Curves
Sales Tax Collected from the Consumers
• Sales Tax
• A new sales tax causes the price that consumers pay to rise and the
price that firms receive to fall.
• The former results in lower CS
• The latter results in lower PS
• New tax revenue is also generated by a sales tax and, assuming the
government does something useful with the tax revenue, it should
be counted in our measure of welfare:
Per Unit (Specific) Sales Tax Collected from Consumers
Before Sales Tax
After Sales tax
Consumers’ Surplus
A+B+C+D+E
A+B
Producers’ Surplus
F+G+H+I
I
Tax Revenue
Social welfare Gain
Deadweight Loss
C+D+F+G
A+B+C+D+E+F+G+H+I
A+B+C+D+F+G+I
E+H
Change in Social Surplus: Sales Tax Paid by Buyers
• Suppose that the market demand function is given by QD = 40 – 2P and
the market supply is given by QS = 2P. What is the social surplus? Now,
suppose that the government imposes a $2 tax per unit of the
commodity. The tax will be collected from the consumers. What would
be the social welfare loss?
• Previously, we calculated that the social welfare before tax was W = 200.
• After tax, the consumers pay the equilibrium price plus the tax, for each
unit of commodity purchased.
• The inverse demand function without tax is P = 20 – (1/2)QD; Since the
consumers pay the tax, it would shift consumers’ demand to the left by
the tax amount. So, the inverse demand function with tax would be
P + 2 = 20 – (1/2)QD
=> P = 18 – (1/2)QD
=> (1/2)QD = 18 – P
=> QD = 36 – 2P
Change in Social Surplus: Sales Tax Paid by Buyers
• At the market equilibrium, QS = QD
2P = 36 – 2P => 4P = 36
=> P = 9
• At this price, equilibrium quantity exchanged is
QS = 2P = 2*9 = 18
• The inverse demand function is P = 18 – (1/2)QD; the height of
the triangle is the intercept of the inverse demand curve minus
(P +T), that is 20 – (9+2) = 7.
CS = ½ (9*18) = 81
• The inverse supply function is P = (1/2)QS; the height of the
triangle is P minus the intercept of the inverse supply curve,
that is 9 – 0 = 9.
PS = ½ (9*18) = 81
• The tax revenue, T = 2*18 = 36
• The new social surplus, W* = CS + PS + T= 81 +81 +36 = 198
• So, the loss is social welfare is, DWL = W – W* = 200-198 = 2
The Effect of a Price Subsidy
Before Sales Tax
After Sales tax
Consumers’ Surplus
A+C
A+C+F+G
Producers’ Surplus
F+H
C+D+F+H
Cost to Tax Payers
Social welfare Gain
Deadweight Loss
− (C + D + E + F + G)
A+C+F+H
A+C+F+H−E
E
Policies That Shift Supply Curves
• Entry Barriers: raising entry costs
• A LR barrier to entry is an explicit restriction or a cost that applies
only to potential new firms (e.g. large sunk costs).
• Indirectly restricts the number of firms entering
• Costs of entry (e.g. fixed costs of building plants, buying
equipment, advertising a new product) are not barriers to entry
because all firms incur them.
• Exit Barriers: raising exit costs
• In SR, exit barriers keep the number of firms high
• In LR, exit barriers limit the number of firms entering
• Example: job termination laws
• Sales Tax Collected from the Sellers
– Shifts the supply curve to the left
– It causes the price that consumers pay to rise and the price that
firms receive to fall.
Policies That Shift Supply Curves
Sales Tax Collected from the Sellers
• Sales tax
imposed on
the sellers
generates
tax revenue
of B+D and
DWL of
C+E.
Change in Social Surplus: Sales Tax Paid by Sellers
• Suppose that the market demand function is given by QD = 40 – 2P and
the market supply is given by QS = 2P. What is the social surplus? Now,
suppose that the government imposes a $2 tax per unit of the
commodity. The tax will be collected from the consumers. What would
be the social welfare loss?
• Previously, we calculated that the social welfare before tax was W = 200.
• After tax, the consumers pay the equilibrium price plus the tax, for each
unit of commodity purchased.
• The inverse supply function without tax is P = (1/2)QS; Since the sellers
pay the tax, it would shift the supply to the left by the tax amount. So,
the inverse demand function with tax would be
P – 2 = (1/2)QS
=> P = 2 + (1/2)QS
=> (1/2)QS = – 2 + P
=> QS = – 4 + 2P
Change in Social Surplus: Sales Tax Paid by Sellers
• At the market equilibrium, QS = QD
– 4 + 2P = 40 – 2P
=> 4P = 44
=> P = 11
• At this price, equilibrium quantity exchanged is
QS = – 4 + 2P = – 4 + 2*11 = 18
• The inverse demand function is P = 20 – (1/2)QD; the height of
the triangle is the intercept of the inverse demand curve minus
(P), that is 20 – 11= 9.
CS = ½ (9*18) = 81
• The producer price received P = 11 – 2 = 9;
PS = ½ (9*18) = 81
• The tax revenue, T = 2*18 = 36
• The new social surplus, W* = CS + PS + T= 81 +81 +36 = 198
• So, the loss is social welfare is, DWL = W – W* = 200-198 = 2
Important Questions About Tax Effects
• Does it matter whether the tax is collected from producers or
consumers?
• Tax incidence is not sensitive to who is actually taxed.
• A tax collected from producers shifts the supply curve back.
• A tax collected from consumers shifts the demand curve back.
• Under either scenario, a tax-sized wedge opens up between
demand and supply and the incidence analysis is identical.
• Does it matter whether the tax is a unit tax or an ad valorem tax?
• If the ad valorem tax rate is chosen to match the per unit tax
divided by equilibrium price, the effects are the same.
Policies That Create a Wedge Between
Supply and Demand Curves
• Welfare is maximized at the competitive equilibrium
• Government actions can move us away from that
competitive equilibrium
• Thus, welfare analysis can help us predict the impact of
various government programs
• We will examine several policies that create a wedge
between S and D:
1. Price floor
2. Price ceiling
Policies That Create a Wedge Between
Supply and Demand Curves
• Price Floor
• A price floor, or minimum price, is the lowest price a consumer
can legally pay for a good.
• Example: agricultural products
• Minimum price is guaranteed by government, but is only
binding if it is above the competitive equilibrium price.
• Deadweight loss generated by a price floor reflects two
distortions in the market:
1. Excess production: More output is produced than
consumed
2. Inefficiency in consumption: Consumers willing to pay
more for last unit bought than it cost to produce
Policies That Create a Wedge Between
Supply and Demand Curves
• Price floor
creates
wedge that
generates
excess
production
of Qs – Qd
and DWL of
C+F+G.
Policies That Create a Wedge Between
Supply and Demand Curves
• Price Ceiling
• A price ceiling, or maximum price, is the highest price a firm can
legally charge.
• Example: rent controlled apartments
• Maximum price is only binding if it is below the competitive
equilibrium price.
• Deadweight loss may underestimate true loss for two reasons:
1. Consumers spend additional time searching and this extra
search is wasteful and often unsuccessful.
2. Consumers who are lucky enough to buy may not be the
consumers who value it the most (allocative cost).
Policies That Create a Wedge Between
Supply and Demand Curves
• Price ceiling
creates
wedge that
generates
excess
demand of
Qd – Qs and
DWL of
C+E.
International Trade Policies
• Finally, we use welfare analysis to examine government policies
that are used to control international trade:
1. Free trade
2. Ban on imports (no trade)
3. Set a tariff
4. Set a quota
• Welfare under free trade serves as the baseline for comparison to
effects of no trade, quotas and tariffs.
• Assume zero transportation costs and horizontal supply curve
for the potentially imported good
• Assumptions imply U.S. can import as much as it wants at p* per
unit.
Free Trade vs. No Trade
• With free trade,
domestic
producers supply
Q=8.2 and imports
of Q=4.9 fill out
our additional
demand for oil at
the low world
price.
• With no trade, we
lose surplus equal
to area C.
• This is the DWL
of a total ban
on trade.
Tariffs
• A tariff is essentially a tax on imports and there are two common
types:
• Specific tariff is a per unit tax
• Ad valorem tariff is a percent of the sales price
• Assuming the U.S. government institutes a tariff on foreign crude oil:
1. Tariffs protect American producers of crude oil from foreign
competition.
2. Tariffs also distort American consumers’ consumption by
inflating the price of crude oil.
Tariffs
• A $5 per unit
(specific) tariff
raises the world
price, which
increases the
quantity supplied
domestically and
decreases the
quantity
imported.
• Tariff revenue of
area D is
generated by the
U.S.
• DWL is equal to
C+E.
Quotas
• A quota is a restriction on the amount of a good that can be
imported.
• When analyzed graphically, a quota looks very similar to a tariff.
• A tariff is a restriction on price
• A quota is a restriction on quantity
• One can find a tariff and a quota that generate the same
equilibrium
• The only difference is that quotas do not generate any
additional revenue for the domestic government.
Quotas
• An import quota
of 2.8 millions of
barrels of oil per
day increases the
quantity supplied
domestically and
decreases the
quantity
imported.
• Equivalent to
$5 per unit
tariff
• DWL is equal to
C+D+E because
no tariff revenue
is generated.