Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
DNA variation in Ecology and Evolution II- Technical approach and concepts Maria Eugenia D’Amato Available at http://planet.uwc.ac.za/nisl BCB 703: Scientific Methodology Methodological approaches to the study of genetic diversity • Molecular genetics techniques • Types and properties of molecular makers • Factors that determine the patterns of genetic variation Molecular techniques 1.Southern blot 2.PCR 3.DNA sequencing Southern blot (1977) 1. Fragmentation of genomic DNA in a reproducible way 2. Separation of the fragments in an electric field Sir Edwin Southern 3. Transfer of the fragments from gel to a membrane 1938Nobel Price 4. Probing of the membrane with known DNA 5. Detection of the probe Southern blot Restriction enzymes molecular scissors Southern blot steps DNA fingerprinting Multilocus Trout DNA digested with Hinf I (GATA)4 Unilocus (GGAT)4 homozygote heterozygote RFLPs Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism. mtDNA PCR 500 250 500 bp Restriction site PCR (1981) Polymerase Chain Reaction • In vitro replication of DNA Kary Mullis 1938Nobel Price 1993 PCR DNA Copies = 2n , n = number of cycles After 30 cycles: 107 million copies PCR machines Applications of PCR: microsatellite genotyping priming site x ♂ ♀ priming site Pedigree analysis Applications of PCR microsatellites for mating strategies Polyembryony in bryozoans? Loci Mother Chamber N A A1 10 A2 5 A3 5 A4 5 A5 4 A6 5 A7 9 A8 5 BA Incubating chamber BA1 BA2 BA3 6 6 5 Cd 4b 149159 159159 159159 149159 149159 149159 149159 159159 149149 Cd 5 180180 180180 180180 180180 180180 180188 180180 180180 180180 Cd 6 168168 168168 168168 168168 168168 168176 168168 168168 168168 Cd 7-1 147171 145147 147171 147147 145171 145171 171171 147147 147171 Cd 17-3 233233 237237 233233 229229 233233 229229 229229 233233 237237 149159 149149 149149 149159 182182 180182 182188 180182 170170 168170 170176 168170 145149 145167 145167 145149 237253 237253 229237 253253 Applications of PCR. Anonymous loci RAPDs AFLPs (Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA) (Amplified Random Length Polymorphism) Dominant multilocus biallelic markers DNA sequencing The old days…. ACGT CTCCGGCTGTAACCTTCAC… Automatic sequencing Molecular Markers • Physical location in a genome whose inheritance can be monitored • polymorphic Parentage, 1. Individual identification relatedness, mating systems 2. Genic variation Gene flow, drift Phylogeography, 3. Gene genealogies speciation, deeper phylogenies Genes in populations N N A a A A a p = 0.6 p = 0.4 a AA p2 A p = 0.6 a p = 0.4 Aa pq 0.36 0.24 Aa pq aa q2 0.24 0.16 Genes in populations: equilibrium of Hardy Weinberg (p + q) 2 = p2 + 2pq + q2 p = freq A q = freq a the organism is diploid with sexual reproduction generations are non overlapping Assumptions loci are biallelic allele frequencies are identical in males and females random mating population size is infinite no migration, no mutation, no selection Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium Consequences of the model • Allele frequencies remain constant, generation after generation • Genotype frequencies can be determined from allele frequencies HWEMathematical example of deviation from equilibrium Genotypes pop I II II IV AA 0.2 0.36 0.5 0.6 Aa 0.8 0.48 0.2 0 Allele freqs Expected genotype freqs aa 0 0.16 0.3 0.4 p 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 q 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 AA Aa aa 0.36 0.48 0.16 0.36 0.48 0.16 0.36 0.48 0.16 0.36 0.48 0.16 Expected genotype freqs In pop I: (0.6 + 0.4)2 = 0.62 + 2 x 0.6 x 0.4 + 0.42 = 0.36 + 0.48 + 0.16 2 = ∑ (O – E)2 2 = 44.4 d.f. = (R-1) x (C-1) = 2 2 d.f =2 = 5.99 highly significant Charles Darwin Departures from HWE: Selection Differential survival and reproductive success of genotypes Balancing selection Frequency dependent Directional selection 0.5 Normal and sickling forms of erythrocytes selection 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 sites Heliconius erato Deviations from HWE: Genetic drift • Random variation of allele frequencies generation after generation • Generated by the random sampling process of drawing gametes to form the next generation dq = q1 – q0 2 dq = p0 q0 2N Variance in 1 generation •Alleles become fixed (freq = 1) or lost (freq = 0) •The effect is more pronounced in small populations • Genetic diversity decreases Genetic drift: Bottlenecks Original population Cheetah: Late Pleistocene bottleneck Population crash recovery American bison: Over hunting bottleneck Genetic drift: Founder effect Skin photosensitivity in a porphyria patient 1 couple carrying the allele immigrated SA in 1688 Today: 30 000 descendant South Africans are affected HWE departure/restoration Migration Migration = Gene flow transfer of alleles from one gene pool to another After m, 80% of the island is A1A1 m and 20% A2A2 Genotypes out of HWE A1A1 = 1 After 1 generation genotypes are in HWE A2A2 = 1 non random mating- drift – no gene flow Population structure • Differential allele frequencies between subpopulations • inbreeding coefficients : measure of H deficiency at different hierarchical levels • Wahlund effect: H deficiency due to subdivision, drift and inbreeding FIS = (Hs – Ho) / Ho within a subpopulation FIT = (HT – H0) / HT among individuals overall populations FST = (HS – HT) / HT between subpopulations Ho = aver. observed H within a subpopulation over loci Hs = aver. expected H within subpopulation over loci Ht = aver. expected H overall Examples of population structure 1 Out of HWE 2 In HWE subpop A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 1 0.25 2 0.35 0.5 0.3 1 2 0.5 0.42 0.25 0.49 0.5 0.35 0.25 0.09 fA1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 fA2 0.5 0.5 Fis = Fit = Fst = 0.5 Fis = 0.3 Fit = 0.2 0.2 0 0 0.0625 Fst = 0.0625 Gene genealogies: a historical perspective Lineage: individuals or taxa related by a common ancestor Phylogenetic tree Diversity with uniparental markers h = p = n haplotypes Total n individuals Haplotype diversity n Σ xixjpij n -1 Nucleotide diversity Phylogeography Study of geographic distribution of lineages Population bottlenecks, expansions Gene flow ESUs Waples 1991: populations that are reproductively separate from other populations and have unique or different adaptations. Moritz 1994: populations that are reciprocally monophyletic for mtDNA alleles and show significant divergence of allele frequencies at nuclear loci. Reciprocal monophyly Crandall et al 2000 ecological exchangeability genetic exchangeability