Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Inequalities in haemoglobinopathy screening in London Dr Nicole Klynman Specialist registrar in public health Commissioned and endorsed by the NHS Haemoglobinopathy Screening Programme in collaboration with London Health Observatory Care pathways for antenatal and neonatal haemoglobinopathy screening in London Commonest single recessive gene in the world High prevalence results from high minority ethnic population In London :- babies born with ß thalassaemia and sickle cell National Policy 1988 British Society of Haematology guidelines 1993 Standing Medical Advisory Committee report 1999-2000 DoH published two health technology assessments NHS plan NHS Plan “ A new national linked antenatal and neonatal screening programme for haemoglobinopathies and sickle cell disease” To be in place by 2004 Organisation of Services in London Neonatal programme (roll out 2003) • Mixture of universal and selective screening • Mixture of cord, capillary and dried blood spot screening • Implications for laboratories service Antenatal programme (roll out 4/04) • Uses local laboratories • Selective screening in some areas based on ethnicity • Many areas already universal screening Some hospitals have linked programmes Methodology of Study Information groups in acute trusts in London • Haematologists, paediatricians, midwifery representatives, haemoglobinopathy counsellors, obstetricians, GPs Individual interviews • voluntary groups, counsellors, genetic services, independent hospitals and midwives Models of good practice identified Analysis of data 29 acute trusts in analysis London-wide report based on questionnaire Flow charts for acute trusts and key recommendations at Strategic Health Authority Level Antenatal screening Pre-screening information and booking clinic 45% of hospitals give written information Leaflets in English Consent for screening • 2 hospital written consent Bookings • >15 weeks Antenatal screening >50% minority ethnic women - 11/29 Co-ordination of screening programme • • • • 28% no programme coordinator identified 17% no named follow-up 20% no deputy Laboratory - 90% named coordinator Copies to GP - 59% hospitals Processing time for samples - 3 hospitals >7/7 Antenatal screening No counsellors • 10 hospitals Women re-screened in each pregnancy Written confirmation • Women (90% if trait, otherwise 21%) • Partners (93% if trait, otherwise 73%) Patient information • in-house, APoGI, voluntary societies Antenatal screening Haemoglobinopathy cards At risk couples • • • • 63% written information 50% counselling at >15/40 66% PND results within 1 week Counselling after PND Neonatal screening Type of screening • Dried blood spot screening programme • Cord blood • Capillary blood Type of programme • Universal • Selective • No organised programme 16 9 1 19 7 3 Results from dried blood spot screening programme Neonatal screening Information to parents • 89% at home • 71% written information • 48% not given trait information Paediatric follow-up • Named paediatrician • Prophylactic treatment at 3/12 SCBU/blood transfusion Emerging Issues Clinical and laboratory service variations in London IT needs are enormous and will need sufficient resources Linkage of programmes currently almost impossible in most areas Lack of primary care involvement Full report available :- www-phm.umds.ac.uk/haemscreening www.lho.org.uk