Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Lab. Meeting (1st August) In Vitro studies to define the role of PERK in insulin synthesis * Using the 832/13 cell line Experimental Design Equal numbers of 832/13 cells were plated on dishes These were starved for the sulphur containing amino acids methionine and cysteine for half an hour Methionine and cysteine labeled with S35 was added to this medium (should be incorporated in any new proteins synthesized) The cell lysates were harvested at different time points (This would be indicative of radiolabeling of proteins in the intracellular compartment) Determination of time point of maximum S35 incorporation Comparison of beta emission generated signal from - Total cell lysates - (TCA precipitated) Total protein (from the cell lysates) : Gives data regarding percentage incorporation Determination of time point of maximum S35 incorporation S35 Incorporation: Total Protein 35 Series1 Percenatge Incorporation 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Time Studying protein synthesis (intracellular compartment) using S35 labeling 832/13 cells = Untreated controls 832/13 cells with lacZ = (adenovirus vector without the dominant negative construct) 832/13 cells with ▲C =(adenovirus vector with the dominant negative construct) INCUBATED for 36 hours, no significant cell death at the time of harvesting S35 incorporation following 30 mins of pulsing s35 incrprn final & revised 45 40 35 30 25 % incrprn. 20 15 10 5 0 Untreated lacZ ▲C Labeling as a fraction of total Protein content in samples comparison total protein vs labeled protein 2500 total protein 2000 total protein 1500 total protein total protein labeled fraction 1000 labeled fraction 500 labeled fraction labeled fraction 0 Untreated LacZ ▲C Autoradiograph for a western of total protein (TCA precipitated samples) to check for signal Immunoprecipitation for insulin IPed protein as a fraction of total labeled protein 16000000 Total protein 14000000 12000000 10000000 CPM 8000000 6000000 4000000 2000000 0 IP Untreated Total protein Total protein IP Total protein IP LacZ IP ▲C Scintillation counter readings Immunoprecipitation for insulin Iped Insulin as a percentage 0.68 0.67 0.66 Percent 0.65 Iped protein(Ins) 0.64 0.63 0.62 Iped protein(Ins) Untreated LacZ ▲C Immunoprecipitation for insulin Non Reducing gel (without Urea) Untreated LacZ ▲C Non Specific Aggregates? Immunoprecipitation for insulin Reducing gel (with Urea) Immunoprecipitation for insulin ImageQuant 0.8 0.7 Average signal/area 0.6 0.5 0.4 ImageQuant 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Untreated LacZ ▲C Suggests higher insulin synthesis in delta C treated cells Insulin Content Daorongs data suggests that - 1. Insulin content in delta C treated cells is lower 2. Delta C treated cells secrete lower amounts of insulin when stimulated with secretagogues • My data suggests that 1. Global protein synthesis is reduced 2. Insulin synthesis is increased Next Step More replicates Check insulin content, too for untreated and vector treated controls for insulin content under similar conditions IP another abundant protein