Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Animal Efficacy Studies for Antitubercular Agents V. Balasubramanian ASTRAZENECA R&D BANGALORE, INDIA Some questions…... Do we need animal model(s) for determining antitubercular efficacy? Is the determination of blood levels sufficient to predict the outcome against infection? Some generalizations….. Drug Class In vitro mode of killing in vivo efficacy parameter • b-lactams Time dependent T > MIC • Aminoglycosides Concentration dependent AUC/AUIC ratio • Fluoroquinolones Concentration dependent AUC/AUIC ratio • Macrolides Time dependent AUC [half-lives and PAE high] T > MIC [half lives and PAE low] Pharmocokinetic Properties of Anti-mycobacterial Drugs Drug [mg/kg] MIC Cmax Fold [ug/ml] [ug/ml] T1/2 T > MIC [h] [h] Isoniazid [25] 0.02 7 350 2 18 Rifampicin [25] 0.1 10 100 3.5 28 Rifabutin [25] 0.05 10 200 45 10 d Rifapentine [25] 0.02 15 750 13.2 5d Pyrazinamide [100] 6 30 5 10 36 Ethambutol [100] 4 2 3 6 2 Pharmocokinetic Properties of Anti-mycobacterial Drugs Drug [mg/kg] MIC Cmax Fold [ug/ml] [ug/ml] Ethambutol [100] 2 Ethionamide [100] 1 Streptomycin [200] 0.5 Amikacin [200] 1 Kanamycin [200] 6 Sparfloxacin [50] 0.12 Ofloxacin [200] 1.0 Linezolid [50] PNU-100480 [50] 4 2 3 30 30 2.8 10 17.7 7 2 2 6 30 5 5.6 20 T1/2 T > MIC [h] [h] 3 2 2 2 2 5 7 1.4 0.7 6 4 8 12 6 18 35 Effect of Chemotherapy on Survival - Kradolfer et al Design • Intravenous infection with M. bovis Ravenal strain • Oral administration of drugs - day 11 & 12 post infection (Sm - s.c.) • Minimal effect: Prolonging the survival of 50% mice in the treated groups - ED50 7 H R E A S Probit 6 5 4 3 2 1 10 100 1000 ED50 [mg/kg] Isoniazid (H) 2.7 - 3.4 Rifampicin (R) 4.5 - 6.5 Ethambutol (E) 35 - 55 Ethionamide (A) 75 - 107 Streptomycin (S) 75 - 108 Dose [mg/kg] Data from: Kradolfer, F. 1970. Antibiotica et Chemotherapia. 16:352-360 Bactericidal Effect of Chemotherapy - Kradolfer et al Design • Intravenous infection with M. bovis Ravenal strain • Bactericidal effect: Culture negativity after prolonged oral treatment 8 Ref: Kradolfer, F & Schnell, R. 1971. Chemotherapy. 16:173-182 Log 10 cfu / lungs 7 6 5 Inh 25 4 Rif 40 Rif 40 + Emb 150 Rif 40 + Sm 250 s.c 3 2 1 0 Rif 40 + Inh 25 0 150 200 Days 250 Bactericidal Effect: An Initial Measure for Comparison Iv infection (~107 cfu); treatment by gavage started 1 wk pi., for 4 wks. Isoniazid, Rifamycins Oxazolidinones 9 9 Log 10 cfu / lungs 8 7 8 6 7 5 6 4 5 3 4 2 3 1 0 Ctrl Rif Rbt Rlz Inh Pza Emb Lev 20 20 20 25 150 125 200 2 Ctrl Inh 25 100480 100 • Cynamon, M. H., Klemens, S. P., Sharpe, C. A., Chase, S. 1999. A. A. C. T. 43:1189-1191 • Klemens, S. P., Grossi, M. A., Cynamon, M. H. 1994. A. A. C. T. 38: 2245-2248 Lin 100 Epre 100 Bactericidal Effect: An Initial Measure for Comparison Iv infection (~107 cfu); treatment by gavage started 1 day pi., for 4 wks. 7 Aminoglycosides & Quinolones Log 10 cfu / spleen 6 5 • Baohong Ji, Lounis, N., Truffot-Pernot C., Grosset, J. 1995. A. A. C. T. 39: 1341 - 1344 4 • Lounis, N., Baohong Ji, Truffot-Pernot C., Grosset, J. 1997. A. A. C. T. 41: 607 - 610 3 2 1 0 Ctrl Inh Sm Kan Ami Ise Spf Ofl Lev 25 200 200 200 200 50 200 200 Bactericidal Effect: Infection Dose As a Variable Treatment by gavage started 1 day pi., for 4 wks. iv infection (~105 cfu) iv infection (~107 cfu) 6 Lungs Spleen 7 Log 10 cfu / organ Log 10 cfu / organ 5 8 Lungs 4 3 2 Spleen 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 0 0 Ctrl Inh 25 Mox 100 Inh25 Mox 100 • Miyazaki, E., R. E., Bishai, W. R. et al. 1999. A. A. C. T. 43: 85-89 Ctrl Mox 100 Inh25 Mox 100 PK Parameters Significant bactericidal activity in mice H >>> Z > Emb > Eth [Cmax, T > MIC] H > Z > Emb > Eth Rfp = Rlz = Rbu > Rif [Cmax, T > MIC] Rlz = Rfp > Rbu > Rif Ami > Sm = Kan [Cmax] Ami > Sm = Kan Spar > Lev = Ofla [Cmax] Spar > Lev = Ofla H > Linezolid > PNU100480 [?] H > PNU100480 > Linezolid No single parameter can independently Rlz = Rfp > Rbu > Rif = Spar > H predict across drug classes H > PNU100480> Lin > Z Z = Ofla > Emb > Eth Clinical Efficacy in Tuberculosis Markers Factors • Early Bactericidal Activity • Combination Regimen • Sputum Conversion • Duration of Rx • Emergence of resistance • Frequency of Dosing • Relapse Rates Why combination is needed and why is it at least six months long? Inh, Rif, Emb 108 Cfu/ml in sputum 107 [Early Bactericidal Activity] 106 105 104 Pza [Sterilizing Activity] 103 Rif 102 2 Time (months) 4 6 Early Bactericidal Activity [EBA] Sterilizing Activity Measured by Cfu from sputum for 1st 2 days after onset of treatment Relapse rates, 30 mo. after onset of treatment Importance Community Individual Drug Isoniazid Rifampicin Pyrazinamide Ethambutol Streptomycin +++ ++ + + + + +++ +++ - Model for the Initial and Continuation Phases of Rx iv infection (107 cfu/animal) Initial Phase [once daily for 2 months] Rx: Oral gavage started 14 days pi. Log10 cfu /spleen Spontaneous Relapse (6 mo. post) Untreated 0 6.65 ± 0.19 Inh+Rif 25 + 10 3.00 0.54 Rif+PZA 10 + 150 0.86 0.44 *Inh+Rif+PZA 25 + 10+ 150 2.79 0.73 Continuation Phase [once daily for 4 months] *+* 25+10+150 0 % mice with +ve spleen cultures 35% *+Inh+Rif 25+10 0 38% *+Rif+PZA 10+150 0 9% Ref: J. Grosset, Truffot-Pernot, C., Lacroix, C., Ji. B. 1992. A.A.C.T. 36: 548-551 Shortened Course - Daily Treatment with Rifapentine Spleen Log10 cfu / organ 9 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 4 8 12 16 Lungs 9 20 24 28 Inh 25 + Rif 20 Inh + Rif +Pza 150 Inh + Pza +Rfp 20 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Inh+Rif 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 Inh+Rif+Pza 6/7 7/7 6/7 7/7 Inh+Pza+Rfp 0/8 3/8 0/8 3/8 Ref: Cynamon, M. H. et al. 1999. A. A. C. T. 43: 2356-2360 28 Intermittent treatment with Rifapentine iv. infection ~107 cfu / animal 8 Log10 cfu / organ 7 Lungs Rx 8 weeks Spleen 8 Lungs Spleen 6 Rx 12 weeks 4 6 Rifr mice 47% 61% 5 3 4 2 3 2 1 1 0 0 Ctrl Rif6 Rfp1 Rif6 Rfp1 Rfp1 HZ6 HZ6 HZ1 ctrl Rfp2 H2 Rfp1 H1 Rfp2 HZ2 Grosset J. et al. 1998. Am J Respir Cynamon, M. H. et al. 1999. Crit Care Med. 157:1436-1440 A. A. C. T. 43: 2356-2360 Rfp1 HZ1 Prophylaxis 0 28 44 100 128 8 wk BCG Infection Log10 cfu / spleen 7 6 12 wk Dosing Ref: Jabes, D., Bruna, C. D., Rossi, R., Olliaro, P. unvaccinated 5 1994. A. A. C. T. 38:2346-2350 untreated 4 HRb (1/wk) 3 * 2 1 0 0 5 10 15 Weeks post vaccination H (6/wk) HRb (2/wk) Rb (6/wk) 20 Cornell Model for Effect on Reactivation Disease Wks. 2 9 Inh+Pza 7 wks 15 Test Rx 6 wks 23 26 Cort 3 wks Infect iv 8.8x105 • • • • Sac 32 35 Cort 3 wks Sac Question: After the initial phase, what confers sterilization? Test regimens were R [15mg/kg]; RH [H25]; RZ [Z150]; RHZ % positive organs : R 81; RH 63; RZ 65; RHZ 71 [p = 0.3] However, trend chi-square suggested than addition of H or Z improved the sterilization effect of R • Answer: At least in the Cornell model, none of the existing regimens confer complete sterilization Ref: Dhillon, J., Dickinson, J. M., Sole, K., Mitchison, D. A. 1996. A. A. C. T. 40: 552-555 Cornell Model for Effect on Reactivation Disease 0 12 Inh+Pza 12 wks Infect iv 3.95x105 Treatment 16 No Rx 34 Test Rx 18 wks 41 No Rx Culture -ve organs Dosing Placebo 44 Cort 48 No Rx Sac % Positive organs Log10cfu spleen Log10cfu lungs 100 3.242.2 5.770.11 Inh 25 daily 50 1.932.11 0.711.34 Rif 10 twice weekly 100 4.110.40 5.390.49 Rpt 10 once weekly 100 3.631.18 4.672.35 Inh+Rpt once weekly 37.5 1.462.04 1.782.49 Ref: Miyazaki, E., Chaisson, R. E., Bishai, W.R. 1999. A. A. C. T. 43:2126-2130 Rifapentine Animal Data • Daily dosing with Rfp offers the possibility of reduced Rx. • However, due to long half life, possibility of accumulation • Based on animal studies, twice weekly better than once weekly • Based on daily dosing in animals, HZRfp > HZRif (relapse rates) • However, relapse rates not determined in the case of intermittent Rx!) • Intermittent Rfp approved by FDA in 1988 (1st in >15 yrs for TB) Clinical Trial data (surprises!) • 2HRZ/4H2R2 better than 2HRpZ/H1Rp1, based on relapse data • 4/5 HIV+ patients in 2HRpZ/H1Rp1 developed Rifres Ref: Vernon, A. et al. 1998. Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care. Med. 157: A467 ROUTE OF INFECTION AS A VARIABLE Infection Route Intravenous Respiratory Infection Dose 106 cfu/animal 10 cfu/animal Quantitation cfu / spleen cfu / lungs Infrastructure Simple Specialized 14.6% Peritoneal 3.7% Meningeal 4.2% Bone/Joint 8.5% Other 9.3% Tuberculosis Pulmonary 84.5% • • • • Miliary 9.8% Genitourinary 16.0% Pleural 21.5% Lymphatic 27.0% Comparison of M. tuberculosis iv. vs. Respiratory Infection in Mice Lungs Spleen 6 resp. i.v. 8 Log 10cfu/lungs i.v. 5 6 4 resp. 4 3 2 0 2 0 50 100 150 Time (days) 200 250 1 0 25 50 75 100 125 Time (days) Ref: 1. Robert J. North. 1995. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is strikingly more virulent for mice when given via the respiratory route than via the intravenous route. J. Inf. Dis. 172:1550-1553. 2. Orme, I. M. & F. M. Collins. 1994. Mouse Model of Tuberculosis. In:Bloom, B. R. (ed) Tuberculosis: Pathogenesis, Protection and Control. ASM, Washington D.C., pp113-134. Model for Evaluating Primary Efficacy Infect with M. tuberculosis Intravenous Challenge (106 cfu / animal) 10 Respiratory Challenge (10 cfu / animal) 7 untreated * Log10 cfu / lungs 8 untreated 6 5 6 4 Rif 25 mg/kg 4 3 Rif 20 mg/kg 2 2 0 0 56 28 84 1 1 84 15 18 21 24 27 14 Time (days) 30 33 Combination Rx in the Respiratory Infection Model 8 8 CSU 93 6 6 Lungs Untreated Inh+Rif Erdman Inh+Rbt 4 4 2 2 Inh+Rpt Log10cfu / organ Inh+Rlz 0 0 20 40 60 0 0 20 40 60 35 Spleen 8 8 CSU 93 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 0 20 40 60 0 0 Days • Resp infection (100 cfu / animal) • Once a week oral Rx Erdman Brooks, J & Orme, I. 1998. A. A. C. T. 42: 3047-3048 Similar results 1/wk; 5 wks (resp) vs 20 40 60 6/wk;12 wks (iv) Model for Evaluating Sterilization [20 wk. assay] Infect with M. tuberculosis 10 Untreated Log10cfu /lungs 8 6 [Untreated+Cortisone] Rif+PZA 4 2 [Test Compound+Cortisone] 0 -2 0 56 112 126 133 140 Days RZ:8wk Test 3wk. 1wk Bactericidal Effect Determined in Guinea Pigs Log10cfu/primary lesion 6 5 Untreated 4 3 2 1 0 0 Inh+Rif 28 56 84 Days 112 140 Ref: Smith, D. W., Balasubramanian, V., Wiegeshaus, E. H. 1991. Tubercle. 72:223-2310 Towards clinical use... Compounds exhibiting statistically significant reduction in cfu PK predictive of efficacy within but not across • Rlz = Rfp > Rbu > Rif = Spar > H • H > PNU100480 > Lin > Z = Ofla = Lev • Z > Emb > Eth • All significantly better than untreated control Culture negativity •Limitation: poor thera. Index •Not predictable from PK/PD •No drug given singly •HRZ > HR > RZ > HZ •RE, RS, HE, not effective Relapse rates 2HRZ/4RZ > 6HRZ > 2HRZ/4HR [8%] [34%] [38%] •In humans 2HRZ/4HR = 6HRZ [~8%]. •2HRZ/4RZ not given due to Z toxicity Clinical Trial? Clues from Animal Efficacy for Clinical Efficacy Humans Expt. animals • EBA • ?? • Sputum conversion • Rate of culture negativity • Drug resistance • Resistance of survivors • Relapse rates @ 30 mo. • Relapse rates @ 6 mo. • Duration of Rx • Time to culture negativity + relapse rates @ 6 mo. • Frequency of Rx • PK profiles such as T1/2 Efficacy Models During the Course of Development • Effect (singly or combination) during early phase of infection * Survival * Bacterial counts • Spontaneous Relapse after initial and continuation phase • Reactivation following immunosuppression - Cornell • Prophylaxis • Effect on immunocompromised hosts • All of the above in animals infected via the airway will be more efficient and relevant Summary of important variables for the different efficacy models Variables Bactericidal effect Spontaneous relapse* Vaccination - - Vaccination-infection interval - - Route of infection i.v. or resp i.v. or (resp) Infection inoculum ~107cfu or 100 cfu ~107cfu or (100 cfu) Infection-Drug interval 2-4 weeks 2-4 weeks Duration of initial treatment 8 wks (iv); 2 wks (resp) 8 wks; (4 wks) Duration of continuation Rx - 16 wks; (8 wks) Duration of immunosuppression - - Post treatment interval 1 day 1 day, 3 & 6 months Measure of efficacy Cfu / spleen or lungs Cfu / spleen or lungs % mice with +ve organ cultures *conditions shown in parentheses not yet established Summary of important variables for the different efficacy models Variables Sterilization* Prophylaxis Vaccination - BCG Vaccination-infection interval - 4 weeks Route of infection i.v. or (resp) i.v. or resp Infection inoculum ~107cfu or (100 cfu) ~107cfu or 100 cfu Infection-Drug interval 2-4 weeks 2-4 weeks Duration of initial treatment 12 weeks 8-12 weeks Duration of continuation Rx 12 weeks - Duration of immunosuppression 3 weeks - Post treatment interval 1 day, 2-4 weeks 1 day Measure of efficacy Cfu / spleen or lungs Cfu / spleen or lungs % mice with +ve organ cultures *conditions shown in parentheses not yet established