Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Trial Vignettes Contemporary trials 3: DES Angela Hoye Castle Hill Hospital, Hull RESOLUTE MEDISTRA ABSORB Conflicts of interest • Speaker honorarium: Cordis • Advisory board panel: Eli Lilly Abbott Vascular RESOLUTE • Multicenter study, n=130, PI Prof Meridith • The Endeavor Resolute stent (Medtronic) retains 3 components of Endeavor Driver Cobalt Chromium Stent Endeavor Delivery System Extended drug-elution Zotarolimus Antiproliferative Drug The BioLinx Polymer System Hydrophilic Zotarolimus Hydrophobic Hydrophilic polymer: Polyvinyl pyrrolidinone (PVP) for initial drug burst and enhanced biocompatibility Hydrophobic polymer: based upon hydrophobic butyl methacrylate (C10) for combining with zotarolimus and uniform drug dispersion Combination polymer: hydrophobic hexyl methacrylate, hydrophilic vinyl pyrrolidinone and vinyl acetate (C19) to support delayed drug elution and biocompatibility Endeavor Resolute Elution Extended in vivo elution kinetics with stent drug content exhausted by 180 days Carter et al TCT2006 Endeavor Resolute Efficacy 28 day results in porcine coronary artery DRIVER CONTROL ENDEAVOR RESOLUTE ENDEAVOR RESOLUTE Significant inhibition of neointimal development compared to Driver controls Carter et al TCT2006 Clinical Trial Design Single De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions Lesion Length: 14-27mm Stent Diameters: 2.5, 3.0, 3.5mm Stent Lengths: 18, 24, 30mm (8/9mm bailout) Drug Dose: 1.6 g/mm2 stent surface area Antiplatelet therapy for 6 months Pre-dilatation required Endeavor Resolute Stent 130 Patients (includes 30 PK Sub-Study Patients) 12 Sites (New Zealand and Australia) Clinical/MACE 30d 4mo 6mo 9mo 12mo 2yr 3yr 4 yr Angio/IVUS N=30 N=100 Primary Endpoint: Late lumen loss (in-stent) at 9 months by QCA Secondary Endpoints: MACE at 30 days, 6, 9 and 12mths and IVUS and angiographic parameters at 9mths 9 month results will be compared to ENDEAVOR II DES cohort 30 pt Subset: 4mth MACE and angiographic, IVUS parameters 5 yr Patient Demographics Male Age Prior MI Prior PCI Diabetes Mellitus Insulin Dependent Unstable Angina Hyperlipidemia Current Smoker – within last 30 days 75.4% 61 + 10yrs 45.7% 18.5% 17.7% 2.3% 29.7% 94.6% 22.3% (98/130) (130) (59/129) (24/130) (23/130) (3/130) (38/128) (123/130) (29/130) Procedural Results Entire patient cohort 130 pts/131 lesions Lesion Length LAD 15.56 + 6.27 mm 34.4% (45/131) B2/C Lesions 82.4% (108/131) Device success Procedure success Lesion success Device success Procedure success 99.2% 96.2% <50% residual in-segment % ds <50% residual in-segment % ds with assigned stent <50% residual in-segment % ds & without 30-day MACE Clinical Results to 30 days Entire patient cohort n = 130 3.8 (5/130) Death Q-Wave MI Non Q-Wave MI 0 0 3.8 (0/130) (0/130) (5/130) Emergent CABG TLR 0 0 (0/130) (0/130) TL-CABG 0 (0/130) TL-PCI 0 (0/130) TVR (non-TL) (%) Stent Thrombosis (%) 0 0 (0/130) (0/130) MACE (%) Angiographic results Subset n=30 RVD (mm) In-stent In-segment 2.90±0.38 Lesion Length (mm) MLD (mm) pre post 2.81±0.36 15.16+5.38 0.83+0.34 2.43±0.45 Acute Gain 1.98±0.45 1.61±0.59 MLD (mm) 4 mo f/u Late Loss (mm) Late Loss Index % DS ABR (%) 2.68±0.39 0.12±0.26 0.06+0.17 7.18±7.86 0 2.38±0.40 0.05±0.20 0.01+0.18 17.74±7.57 0 IVUS Volumetric Results Subset n=30 Post Procedure 4 mo Follow up EEM Volume 345.5 + 110 mm3 337.5 + 88.1 mm3 Stent Volume 170.7 + 58.8 mm3 167 + 44.8 mm3 Neointimal Volume 0.42 + 1.15 mm3 3.72 + 4.21 mm3 (mm2) IVUS Cross-sectional area results: (serial IVUS (2D & 3D analysis, n=29) 10 8 6 4 2 0 6.7 ± 1.6 6.8 ± 1.7 Post Stent Follow up P=NS Conclusions • Excellent rate of device, lesion and procedural success • Low clinical adverse event rate at 30 days • The angiographic and IVUS results observed in the 4 month subset demonstrated low late loss, and minimal neointimal hyperplastic in-growth Medistra Excel Drug-ElutIng Stent TRiAl • Single center registry of “real world” cases • PI Dr Santoso, Medistra Hospital, Jakarta Platform: S-Stent Strut thickness 0.0047” Carrier : Biodegradable EXCEL PLA polymer JW Technologies Drug : Sirolimus 40%of Sirolimus released in an initial 24 h, followed by a constant slow release (3-6 months) Lower cost: $1,200 28-day preclinical study results without Sirolimus with Sirolimus Medistra Excel Drug-ElutIng Stent TRiAl Single center, prospective, observational study (2004-06) Study NOT sponsored by the company Inclusions: All comers who are candidates for PCI (“real world cases”) Exclusions: Contraindications to anti-platelets Patients with short life expectancy & concomitant disease (advanced cancer, etc) Lack of patient’s consent serious Medistra Excel Drug-ElutIng Stent TRiAl Primary End-Point: TLR at 6 and 12 months Secondary End-Points: 6-month in-segment restenosis rate In-segment late loss Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE): Death, QMI, NQMI, & / or TLR QCA analysis was done by an independent core laboratory (National Heart Centre - Singapore) (Dr. A. Wong, A/Prof. T.H. Koh) Medistra Excel Drug-ElutIng Stent TRiAl Predilatation is encouraged, even though direct stenting is allowed in simple lesion Stent selection: Try to always use EXCEL If appropriate size / length not available, use other DES (Cypher or Taxus) If other DES is not available (logistic problem), use BMS • Antiplatelet regimen: • ASA 160 mg indefinitely (unless contraindicated) • Clopidogrel 300 mg (loading), then 75 mg for 6 months Methods All comers, N = 279 2 stent dislodgement* (“prototype stent”) 277 eligible pts, 631 lesions DES-stenting as default strategy (N=771 stents), except if there is logistic problem (BMS will be used) EXCEL CYPHER TAXUS BIOMATRIX ENDEAVOUR BMS N=470 N=137 N=86 N=27 N=5 N=46 * 1 case when negotiating mildly stenotic, acutely angulated LCX to fix mid-LCX stenosis 1 case with diffuse, calcified mid-RCA stenosis, during attempted direct stenting 61% of stents Demographics (n=277) • Age (yrs) 58.5 + 9.4 • Male 226 (81.6%) • Family history 97 (35. 0%) • Hypertension 152 (54.9%) • Dyslipidemia 160 (57.8%) • Diabetes mellitus 110 (39.7%) • Smoking 119 (43.0%) • Prior MI 123 (44.4%) • Prior CABG 14 (5.0%) • Prior PCI 77 (22.8%) Clinical Presentation Clinical presentation Stable angina Unstable angina / ACS Acute MI Recent MI ( < 30 days) Silent ischemia LVEF (%, mean + SD) 133 (48.0%) 32 (11.6%) 11 (4.0%) 15 (5.4%) 86 (31.0%) 59 + 11% Lesion types SVG 0.7 LM 1.2 ISRS 5.8 Thrombus 13.7 CTO 14.1 Bifurcation 18.4 Long>25mm 19.1 Calcification 28.1 DM 39.7 Small vessel 49.3 Type B2/C 85.3 0 20 40 60 80 100 % Stent Diameter (n=771 stents) EXCEL (n=470) 2.5 mm 3.0 mm TAXUS (n=86) 3.5 mm 2.5 mm 3.0 mm 15 % 48 % 2.75 mm 3.5 mm 15 30 22 37 33 BMS (n=46) CYPHER (n=137) 2.5 mm 3.0 mm 9 % 2.5 mm 3.5 mm 2.75 mm 3.5 mm 3.0 mm 4.0 mm 17 27 41 31 % 33 22 24 BIOMATRIX (n=27): 2.5 mm:16; 3 mm:5; 3.5 mm:3; 4 mm:3 ENDEAVOUR (n=5): 2.5 mm:2; 3 mm:2; 3.5 mm:2 Clinical results 30 days No. pts Death Non-fatal MI TLR/TVR CABG Stent thrombosis 6 months 12 months 232 (84%) 210 (76%) 2 (0.9%) *+ 2 (1.0%) 0 0 4 (1.9%) 1 (0.4%)* 154 (51%) 2 (1.3%) 0 6 (3.9%) 0 2 (0.9%)* 0 2 (1.0%) 0 2 (1.3%) * Pt with diffuse small LAD disease, multiple overlapped Cypher & Excel stents + Pt with triple, small vessel disease, died 1 week after PCI (5 stents: Excel, BioMatrix & Cypher) QCA analysis at 6 months (independent QCA lab – NHC, Singapore) QCA analysis: 94 pts with 217 lesions 34% of the total patient cohort Types of Stents used (per lesion) Cypher Taxus EXCEL BMS (n=34) (n=30) (n=138) (n=15) Lesion length(mm)15.8 18.3 15.8 12.3 Stent size (mm) 2.85 2.87 2.86 3.50 Stent length (mm) 22.5 26.8 21.7 16.8 QCA analysis at 6 months CYPHER TAXUS EXCEL BMS Pre procedural RVD, mm MLD, mm DS, % 2.60 0.93 57.3 2.57 0.95 62.2 2.53 0.97 60.0 3.20 1.09 66.0 Post procedural MLD, mm DS, % 2.13 17.7 2.11 18.8 2.08 17.7 2.73 12.8 1.78 31.7 10% 2.07 21.6 5% 2.06 35.9 17% 0.31 (p=0.03) 0.01 0.55 (p=0.003) 0.35 (p=0.004) 0.07 0.59 (p<0.001) Follow-up (6 months) MLD, mm 1.89 DS, % 29.2 Binary restenosis 18% Late loss, mm In-segment 0.24 (p=0.12) In-stent 0.25 (p=0.055) Conclusion Despite the inclusion of challenging “real world cases” (DM, MVD, small vessel, complex lesions, long – diffuse disease, calcified stenosis, ostial stenosis, LM, AMI, CTO, instent restenosis, etc) the preliminary EXCEL results are encouraging, with very low MACE rate & “clean” angiographic appearance of the stent. ABSORB study • FIM study of the BVS everolimus-eluting bioabsorbable stent from Abbott Vascular • Preliminary results presented by Dr J Ormiston ML VISION™ Balloon SDS BVS bioabsorbable stent platform A polymeric stent made from linked polylactic acid molecules that break down into lactic acid Everolimus Bioabsorbable Polymer Coating Porcine Coronary Artery Safety Study: Representative Photomicrographs (10x) BVS 28 Day 90 Day 180 Day 270 Day Competitive Metallic DES* 28 Day 90 Day 180 Day 270 Day *CYPHER ® Product currently in development at Abbott Vascular. Not available for sale. SE 2925096/B ABSORB STUDY • FIM study of 30 patients with single de novo native lesions • The stent used was 3.0 x 12 mm • Cypher stents were used if necessary as “bailout” • PIs Dr Ormiston, Prof Serruys Pre Product currently in development at Abbott Vascular. Not available for sale. Final SE 2925096/B Baseline Lesion Characteristics: Acute Success n=30 Location: Lesion classification: Clinical device success: LAD RCA LCx B1 B2 47% 23% 30% 60% 40% 93.5% - successful delivery & deployment of stent with final residual DS of <50%. Bailout patients will be included as device success only if the above criteria for clinical device are met. Clinical procedure success: 100% - definition above and/or using any adjunctive device without occurrence of ischemia driven MACE during first 7 days Bailout Stents = 4 patients: Two patients had procedure dissections treated with single CYPHER® stents, one patient received a CYPHER® stent for vessel step-down and one patient received three CYPHER® stents to treat the target lesion. In-Stent Baseline QCA N = 30 Pre-procedure Lesion length (mm) RVD (mm) MLD (mm) DS (%) 9.05 2.69 1.06 60 N = 26* Post-procedure MLD (mm) DS (%) Acute gain (mm) 2.31 17 1.22 * Per treatment evaluable population. Four patients excluded that received a non-BVS bail out stent, including one patient that did not receive a BVS stent at the target lesion Acute Recoil (n=27*) Average of Mean Lumen Diameter (mm) Stent Expansion 2.86 Post Stent Expansion Absolute Stent Recoil Relative Stent Recoil 2.67 0.20 6.85% Ref: S. Tanimoto et al: Acute Stent Recoil of a Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent: In Vivo Evaluation; e-Poster presentation number 306, TCT 2006. Recoil rate for XIENCE™ V stent 4.27% (p=0.25) *Subgroup analysis, recoil data not available in three patients Clinical Results Hierarchical MACE at 30 Days Cardiac Death % Myocardial Infarction % Q-wave MI Non Q-wave MI N = 26 0 0 Ischemia driven TLR % CABG PCI 0 MACE % Stent thrombosis % 0 0 Conclusions • In this FIM study of a bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting stent, there was low acute stent recoil • There was a high rate of procedural success (100%) • At 30 days, there were no cardiac deaths, no MI, no stent thrombosis, and no TLR Summary • Encouraging preliminary results with all three stents – Zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Resolute stent (Medtronic) – Sirolimus-eluting Excel stent (JW Technologies) – Bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting stent (Abbott Vascular) Thankyou