Download PEDS 409 Research Design: True Experimental

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
PEDS 409 Research Design:
True Experimental
BY: Sherri Beauchamp, Marie
Buchta, Avaleigh Wagner & Jodi
Spink
Li, F. et al. (2001) Tai Chi
Enhances Self-Efficacy and
Exercise Behavior in Older
Adults. Journal of Aging
and Physical Activity (9):
161-171.
Authors and Affiliations
Fuzhong Li: Oregon Research Institute
Edward McAuley
Peter Harmer
Terry E. Duncan
Nigel R. Chaumeton
Grants from: National Institute on Drug
Abuse and National Institute on Aging
Research Question
What are the effects of a Tai Chi
intervention program on perceptions of
personal efficacy and exercise behavior
in older adults?
Type of Research
True Experimental
One or more control groups AND one or more
treatment groups
Random assignment from population of interest
Variables of interest can be manipulated directly
Type of Research (con’t)
Randomized Control Trial Design
R
R
O1
O1
X1
O2
O2
X2
R = Randomized Samples
O1-3 = Observations
X1-2 = Tai Chi intervention
O3
O3
Type of Research (con’t)
Advantages
Good for assessing change during and after
intervention
Main threats are controlled (testing, maturation etc.)
Disadvantages
Attrition rates
Diffusion of intervention (ie control group increases
activity)
Resentment for no intervention
Research Methods
Individuals responded to newspaper ads
and flyers at senior centers
Inclusion criteria
 65 years of age or older
Low active according to PASE (Physical Activity
Scale for the Elderly)– no involvement in regular
exercise program within the last month
Healthy – exercise will not have negative physical
effects
Willingness to be randomly assigned
Research Methods (con’t)
98 individuals 65-96 years old were
chosen
Assigned to either a Tai Chi practice
group or a waiting list
Assessed demographic characteristics:
age, gender, education, income &
ethnicity
6 month trial
Research Methods (con’t)
Intervention group
Yang Style Tai
Chi
60 min. practice
sessions 2x/week
for 6 months
15 min. warm
up, 15 min cool
down included in
practice session
Control Group
Maintained
routine activities
Could not join
new exercise
programs
Promised a 4
week Tai Chi
program at the
end
What is Yang Style Tai Chi?
Yang Style Tai Chi is a slow moving form that affects balance
postural alignment & concentration
Research Methods (con’t):
Outcome Measures
 Barrier scale selfefficacy
5 items to assess
perception of ability
to perform Tai Chi
regularly in the face
of barriers (ie. Pain,
boredom etc.)
0-100 confidence
scale (0=very little
confidence,
100=complete
confidence)
 Performance scale selfefficacy
3 item task-specific,
time-based
Degree of confidence
in ability to
successfully perform
a series of slow,
rhythmically
changing body
position movements
0-100 confidence
scale
Outcome Measures con’t
Class Attendance
Exercise behavior was assessed by
attendance taken by instructor
Frequency of Measurements
Baseline measures - prior to study
2nd measures – week 12
3rd measures – week 24
(intervention group responded in class within 1
week, control group responded by mail)
Main Findings
Tai Chi exercise program can
significantly enhance perceptions of taskspecific personal efficacy in older adults
The Tai Chi group developed higher
perceptions of efficacy, adhered better to
the exercise program and spent more time
engaged in exercise (therefore increased
exercise participation)
Main Findings (con’t)
Intervention (Tai Chi) group
Both types of efficacy increase over time
Initial boost from baseline to 2nd observation
Maintenance from 2nd to 3rd observation
Class attendance was significantly predicted by the
changes in the 2 types of efficacy
Control group
Both types of efficacy decreased over time
Main Findings (con’t)
Change in barrier
efficacy between Tai
Chi and Control
Change in
performance efficacy
between Tai Chi and
Control
Brief Critique
All subjects were volunteers – this could make
generalizability difficult
Gender was recorded but not specified in
results – potential influence of a moderator
variable
Monitoring attendance issues – no parameters
set aside for absenteeism - assumption that
absenteeism is due to self-efficacy
All self-efficacy measures are self-reported
therefore subject to social desirability biases
Brief Critique (con’t)
Physical activity in control group was not
monitored throughout the study
No data comparing the decrease in self-efficacy to a
decrease in activity
Motivation issue – feel obligated to attend
because are in the study
Would participants attend these classes if not in the
study? (long term adherence)
Validity of claim: intervention should be
compared to other organized activities/classes
Brief Critique (con’t)
Ethical issues: Control group was only offered
a 4 week Tai Chi class after the study, whereas
intervention group got 6 months
Self-efficacy measures are based on
performance of Tai Chi not general daily
activity (not applicable to control group)
Warm up and Cool down not specified
Sample size decreased due to attrition which
could impact generalizability
Future Research Suggestions
Compare Tai Chi results to more
Traditional forms of exercise (ie. Strength
training, walking, stretching, etc.).
Compare positive effects of Tai Chi in
other age groups.
Look at adherence over longer periods of
time or post-intervention (months, years
later)
Future Research Suggestions
(con’t)
Impact of Tai Chi on health & related
aging problems as compared to other
activities/interventions.
Examine impact of Tai Chi on adherence
to/participation in activities of daily
living
Other questions that can be
addressed with True
Experimental Research
Can be used for any study involving an
intervention (ie. Drug, exercise,
acupuncture, rehabilitation therapy, any
lifestyle factor etc.) on a sample of a
specific population
THE END