Download Pre-specified Adverse Events: Cardiovascular

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine
and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel
as first-line treatment of advanced
urothelial carcinoma
Presented by Celine BOUTROS
Hotel-Dieu de France
1
Background
•
•
•
•
Bladder cancer is the 4th cancer in men, the 9th in women
69,000 new cases diagnosed in the US in 2008
Transitional Cell Carcinoma (TCC): most frequent histological subtype
The standard first-line regimen in advanced TCC:
- 1989-2000: Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, Cisplatin (MVAC)1
- > 2000: Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin2 : similar activity, less toxicity
1
2
Sternberg CN et al. Cancer 1989;64:2448-2458.
Von der Maase H et al. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:3068-3077.
2
Objectives of the study
Primary objective
• Explore the activity of
Gemcitabine plus Carboplatin
(GC) followed sequentially with
Paclitaxel in advanced TCC
Secondary
objective
• Assess the toxicity profile of the
regimen
3
Materials and Methods
eligibility
Single-Arm, Multicenter, Phase II trial , from September 2004 to
September 2007
Eligibility Criteria:
• At least one dimensionally measurable disease
• Locally advanced or metastatic disease
• Histological infiltrative urothelial cancer
• No prior chemotherapy unless given in more than one year freeinterval
• No prior radiation therapy
• Performance status (PS) ≤ 2
• Adequate blood counts and chemistries
• Normal organ function
4
Materials and Methods
treatment schedule
Gemcitabine
800mg/m2 (D1, D8)
+
Carboplatin AUC 2
(D1, D8)
Evaluation
(RECIST)
Paclitaxel
60 mg/m2
weekly for 12
weeks
Evaluation
(RECIST)
Every 3 weeks for
4 cycles
5
Results
Patient Characteristics
n
Mean age (years)
%
68
Male / Female
22 / 5
81/18
ECOG PS ≤ 2
27
100
Prior radical cystectomy
12
44
Prior chemotherapy
0
0
Distant metastases
11
40
Locoregional disease with only
positive lymph nodes
16
60
Patients included
27
6
Results
Drug delivery
Assessment of drug delivery for GC and Paclitaxel
sequences
Paclitaxel
GC sequence
sequence
Mean number of
cycles administered
3.5
7
Number of patients
removed
7
6
- progression
- personal request
6
1
0
6
Dose reduction for
myelosuppression
2
2
7
Results
Treatment efficacy
Response Assessment to GC and Paclitaxel
sequences
GC sequence
End of therapy
41% (1)
43% (2)
1
10
3
3
SD
3
4
PD
11
4
Overall response rate
CR
PR
(1) 8 responses of 11 achieved in locally advanced TCC without distant metastases
(2) Responses achieved in locally advanced TCC without distant metastases (same patients)
8
Results
follow-up
•
•
Median response duration: 6 months
Median follow-up: 7 months
- 21 patients died
- 6 remained alive ---> 2 CR
---> 1 PR
9
Results
treatment-related toxicities (grade 3/4)
GC sequence
End of treatment
Neutropenia
2
0
Anemia
3
1
Thrombocytopenia
2
0
Nausea/emesis
1
0
Diarrhea
0
1
10
Results
Myelosuppression-related complications
GC sequence
End of treatment
Febrile neutropenia
1
0
Platelet transfusion
1
0
RBC transfusion
11
0
Bleeding episodes
0
0
11
Conclusion
•
•
•
•
Well tolerated regimen
ORR is in agreement with the results of
previous regimens
Limited number of patients
Relatively short follow-up (7 months)
12
Related documents