Download GALA Review of LA vs GA

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
GA versus LA
The Story So Far
Dr Andrew R Bodenham
The General Infirmary at Leeds
Funding: Health Foundation, ESVS
“This patient is rather frail with multiple co-morbidities
so I have told her it is safer to perform her carotid
surgery under local anaesthetic.”
Funding: Health Foundation, ESVS
Why the Debate: LA versus GA
• Increasing demand for surgical procedures
• High risk patients (IHD, DM, COPD, elderly)
• Elective surgery:
A numbers game: Risk of procedure versus long term benefit
• Safer procedures might allow more patients to benefit from
intervention
Funding: Health Foundation, ESVS
What is a GA ?
• Unconscious patient throughout
• Artificial airway, paralysis, ventilation
• Volatile or intravenous anaesthesia
• Loss of systemic/cerebral autoregulation
• Indirect physiological monitoring
• Possible Cerebral protection
• Occasional anaesthetic catastrophes (1:250000)
Funding: Health Foundation, ESVS
What is a LA technique ?
In ascending complexity
• Topical LA (e.g. eye)
• Local infiltration surgical wound
• Superficial nerve block
• Deep nerve plexus block
• Spinal/epidural
Sedation or GA can be added to any of the above
LA provides intra op and post op anaesthesia/analgesia
Funding: Health Foundation, ESVS
LA vs GA
• Intuitive that a minor procedure on skin surface
under topical or infiltration anaesthesia should
be safer without a GA: e.g. cataract under
topical LA
• But as surgery gets more invasive with greater
tissue injury & stress response, and local
anaesthetic techniques become more invasive,
the benefit of LA over GA becomes blurred
Funding: Health Foundation, ESVS
Why might LA be safer ?
•
•
•
•
•
•
Definitive CNS monitoring
Maintenance cerebral/coronary autoregulation
Better post op pain relief
Early mobilisation
Lower risk of respiratory problems and DVT
Reduced stress response to surgery
• Avoid the other complications specific to GA
Funding: Health Foundation, ESVS
Rarer Anaesthetic Complications
• Approx 1% risks not discussed with patients
Airway events, hypoxia
Adverse drug reactions
Complications of central venous access
MI, stroke, DVT, chest infection
• Are these reduced by Local Anaesthesia ?
Funding: Health Foundation, ESVS
Evidence for GA vs LA in
Other Surgical Procedures
• Cataracts, hip fracture, other major surgery
Some large controlled studies
• Studies have compared
GA v Local infiltration
GA v regional nerve block
GA with and without regional nerve block
• No clear benefit established !
MASTER study Lancet 2002; 359; 1276-82
BMJ Rodgers 2000; 321: 1493 (also in bandolier)
Lancet 2008; 372:562-569
Best practice and research anaesthesia 2006;20: 249-63
Funding: Health Foundation, ESVS
Putative Cost Benefits of LA
• Less workup
• Less monitoring
• £££; drugs, shunt, other consumables
• Avoid HDU/ITU
• Quicker mobilisation
• Shorter Hospital stay
• Avoid expensive complications
Funding: Health Foundation, ESVS