Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Closing the Gaps in Philippine Drug Discovery & Development Questions: 1. How can the Philippines respond to global and regional opportunities and threats afforded by the rapidly changing dynamics in the biopharmaceutical sector? 2. Do we have the capabilities and infrastructure to develop our own innovative biopharmaceutical industry, i.e., beyond generics manufacturing? 3. To what stage can we and should we develop a drug candidate? 4. Which areas of research should we look into and prioritise? 5. What are the gaps in the drug discovery and development chain that we should fill in for us to be able to address our own health and medical needs, while trying to compete in an increasingly global industry? Overview of drug discovery and development safety 5 Confirm efficacy Monitor side effects Compare to other treatments 250 efficacy First-in-man? In-house/outsource? dose range Target ID/Valid Safety Pharmacol HTS/Hits Animal Models Lead Optim ADME For every 10-20 marketed drugs, only 2 return a profit! Active compound “hits” are not drugs Disease Drug Target Compound Libraries Natural Products Existing Dugs Peptides Computer-assisted drug design Biological Assay Active compound “Hit” Lead Optimisation: Making them “drug-like” Hit moderate potency less “drug-like” Hit to Lead Improve potency SAR mainly in vitro LEAD drug-like potent, soluble selective, bioavailable etc From original hit in biological screen to drug development candidate What gives a molecule drug-like features? Physicochemical prop (lipophilicity, acidity/basicity, solubility, permeability) Biophysical properties (ADME) Pharmacokinetics (Clearance, volume, half-life, BA) Toxicology Fully Integrated Pharmaceutical Company (FIPCo) Research Preclinical Phase I Phase II Phase III Manufacturing Marketing & Distribn Value Proposition - the experts in bringing drugs from bench to market Value Chain - have strengths in every level of the development chain Revenue Generation Model - out-license first few compounds to gain revenues then selectively bring to market certain compounds (big pharma need not do this) * usually in indication & geographies with manageable distribution The Philippine Situation: No drug discovery companies Generics companies: Research Preclinical Phase I Phase II Phase III Manufacturing Marketing & Distribn smaller research budgets R&D limited to satisfying regulatory requirements of BABE provides us with OTCs and meds for common indications For most other indications, we rely heavily on the multinational corporations which have marketing and distribution subsidiaries here in the Philippines. Drugs of the Future SMDs Recomb proteins and mAbs siRNA miRNA Therapeutic peptides gene therapy Therapeutic vaccines stem cells Industry Trends Blurring distinction between pharma and biotech Big pharma ventures into biologics. Biotech ventures into small molecule drugs (SMDs). Pharma relies on biotech to fill its drying pipeline of drugs. (Credit crunch: Big Pharma to the rescue….) Biotech is good at making innovative drugs. Pharma is good at selling them. Once different, now collaborative ………… Dwindling productivity: Biologics to the Rescue Source: PhRMA 2007; FDA Outsourcing and the Rise of the CROs PRE-CLINICAL: ADME-Tox studies (e.g., BioFocus) Animal models of disease (e.g., Cerebricon) CLINICAL: Phase I clinical trials units (e.g., Quintiles) Phase I-III (e.g. Quintiles, Parexel) Patent Cliff / Threat from Generics Over $63 billion of annual income washed away due to patent erosion by 2014 Source: Royal Society of Chemistry UK (www.rsc.org) Big Pharma Buying into Generics Big Pharma Sanofi Generics Company Zentiva Piramal Medley Location Czech Republic India Brazil Pfizer Aurobindo Pharma India Strides Arcolab Claris Life Sciences India Merck Daiichi Sankyo BioVentures (created) Ranbaxy India GSK Prasco Labs Aspen Pharma Shenzen Neptunus Dr. Reddy’s US South Africa China India Astra Zeneca Par Pharmaceutical US Sandoz (generics division of Novartis) Novartis Drug Discovery Agenda: Translational Gap Natural Products Research Medicinal Plants antimicrobial, hypoglycaemic, analgesic, anti-cancer Marine Natural Products (Pharmaseas Project) pain, antimicrobial, etc? Oncology mAbs No SMD research ? Dengue Vaccines Natural Products: Record of Productivity Small-molecule NCEs 1981-2002 6% 39% 27% 5% 23% natural products natural product derivatives synthetic compounds with NP pharmacophores natural product mimic other Source: Newman, Cragg & Snader (NIH/NCI) ANTIBACTERIALS: 78% ANTICANCER: 74% n=877 Modernisation of Natural Products Research NOT ALL GINSENG IS THE SAME: Rg1 (sterol ginsenoside) Glucocorticoid receptor upregulates a growth receptor stimulates blood vessel growth Rb1 (sterol ginsenoside) Estrogen receptor different pathway inhibits blood vessel growth Gaps in understanding of the biopharma business NIRPROMP ? Criteria for drug discovery programs: 1. Should address unmet medical need 2. Market potential should be considered to allow a return on investment 3. Product differentiation; preferably first-in-class and demonstrate superior efficacy for it to capture and sustain a good market share. Need to re-focus efforts ! Cuba: Lessons on Priorities and Strategy More than 60 commercial products and 1200 patents since 1981. 1981 1990 3 2000 2007 38 19 Cancer therapies, vaccines for tropical Diseases, AIDS medications, etc 1st World Results on Third World Budget Clock for commercialisation begins ticking CLINIC Lead optimisation Hit-to-Lead Identify disease target Develop biological screen Composition of matter patents INCREASING VALUE Gaps in the Drug Discovery & Development Continuum Research HTS Preclinical MedChem Phase I Phase II ADME-Tox Phase III Manufacturing Marketing & Distribn Animal Models Safety pharmacology (pre-clinical) Detect undesirable secondary pharmacologic effects on critical organ systems: Cardiovascular: bp, heart rate, ECG, QT issues CNS: motor activity, behavioural changes, coordination, sensory/motor reflexes Respiratory: resp rate, tidal volume, blood oxygentaion GI: gastric secretion, GI injury potential, bile secretion, transit time in vivo Renal: urinary vol, spec grav, osmolal, pH, fluid/electrol bal, blood chem, GFR + genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicology studies Disconnect: industry needs/scientific expertise Skills gap: Skills gap: MEDICINAL CHEM PROTEOMICS/ METABOLOMICS Skills gap: Skills gap: ADME-Tox BIOPROCESSING Gap: Hardly any research into biologics By 2014: 7 out of 10 drugs will be biologics. Top 5 will be mAbs. Avastin will be number 1 Humira will be close 2nd Source: Evaluate Pharma UP NIMBB: AMOR 1 & 2 Both to bring around $9 billion a year Magnifies lack of critical mass (and facilities) In molecular biology research? Nor biosimilars …. Biologics are difficult to replicate ….. The process is the product ! Manufacturing processes are complex (and never fully disclosed) Supplemental approvals for minor changes Different product iterations and versions may require Further lengthy clinical trials The Way Forward Diversify funded research Incorporate commercial criteria in proposal assessments unmet medical need market potential/ROI product differentiation etc Bring drug candidates through to phase I if possible Develop capabilities in med chem & prescribed assays Mind the skills gap (from pre-clinical R&D to clinical trial mgt) Pour in money …..