Download USING RECOVERY MEDICATIONS:

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Medication Assisted Therapy for
Opioid Addiction:
Methadone and Buprenorphine
Andrew J. Saxon, M.D.
Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System
and
University of Washington
Seattle, WA
Disclosures

Supported by:
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Clinical Trials Network

Scientific Advisory Board, Alkermes, Inc.

Speaker, ReckittBenckiser, Inc.
Medication Assisted Treatment
• Methadone and Buprenorphine
– Pharmacology
– Efficacy
• Starting Treatment with Agonist
Replacement Therapies (START) Study
– Comparing methadone and buprenorphine on
• Treatment retention
• Illicit opioid use
• HIV risk reduction
Methadone Pharmacokinetics
and Dosing
• Rapidly absorbed
• Peak Levels in 4 hours
• t1/2=24 hours
• Metabolized in liver (p450 3A/4)
• Doses should be individualized but higher
doses generally more effective
Kyle et al., 1999
Swedish Methadone Study
Experimental Group
(Methadone)
Gunne & Gronbladh, 1981
Before
Control Group
(No Methadone)
Swedish Methadone Study
Experimental Group
(Methadone)
After 2 Years
Control Group
(No Methadone)
a
b
c
d
d
d
Gunne & Gronbladh, 1981
a
b
c
d
Sepsis
Sepsis and Endocarditis
Leg Amputation
In Prison
Methadone Side Effects
• Minimal sedation once tolerance achieved
• Constipation
• Increased Appetite/Weight Gain
• Lowered Libido; May decrease gonadal
hormone levels
• Exhaustively studied in all other organ
systems with no evidence of chronic harm
Properties of Buprenorphine,
a µ-Opioid Partial Agonist
Ceiling effect on respiratory depression
High affinity for µ-opioid receptor
Slowly dissociates from µ-opioid receptors
Ameliorates withdrawal once underway
Can precipitate withdrawal if given in
temporal proximity to full agonist opioids
Efficacy: Full Agonist (Methadone) Partial Agonist
(Buprenorphine), Antagonist (Naloxone)
100
Full Agonist
(Methadone)
90
80
70
%
60
Efficacy
50
Partial Agonist
(Buprenorphine)
40
30
20
Antagonist
(Naloxone)
10
0
-10
-9
-8
-7
Log Dose of Opioid
-6
-5
-4
Buprenorphine Pharmacology
Poor oral bioavailability; given sublingually
(subcutaneous implants: experimental;
patch: for pain)
Slow onset (Peak effects 3-6 hrs.)
Long duration (24 - 48 hours)
Slow offset
Half life > 24 hours
Zubieta et al., 2000
Buprenorphine Maintenance vs.
Detoxification
No. Assessed for
Eligibility: 84
All Patients:
No. Excluded:
44
Not Meeting Inclusion Criteria:
41
Group CBT Relapse Prevention
Weekly Individual Counseling
Refused to Participate:
Three times Weekly Urine
Screens
No. Randomized:
40
Other Reasons:
2
1
Allocated to Buprenorphine:
20
Allocated to Detox/placebo:
20
Received Buprenorphine:
20
Received Detox/Placebo:20
Included in Analysis:
Included in Analysis*:
Excluded from Analysis:
20
0
Excluded from Analysis:
20
0
Kakko J et al. 1-year retention and social function after buprenorphine-assisted relapse prevention treatment for heroin dependence in
Sweden: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 361(9358):662-8, 2003.
Remaining in treatment (nr)
Maintenance vs. Detoxification: Retention
20
15
10
Detox/placebo
5
Buprenorphine
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
Treatment duration (days)
300
350
Maintenance vs. Detoxification: Mortality
Detox/Placebo Buprenorphine Cox regression
Dead
4/20 (20%)
0/20 (0%)
c2=5.9; p=0.015
Kakko J et al. 1-year retention and social function after buprenorphine-assisted relapse prevention treatment for heroin
dependence in Sweden: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 361(9358):662-8, 2003.
Buprenorphine Implants for Opioid Addiction
Ling et al., 2010
START Study Schema
1920
Number screened for participation
1269
740 Buprenorphine/Naloxone
340 Evaluable
400 Failed to remain on assigned
medication for 24 wks
0
Failed to provide ≥ 4 LT samples
261 Completed 32-week follow-up
Randomized
529 Methadone
391 Evaluable
136 Failed to remain on assigned
medication for 24 wks
2 Failed to provide ≥ 4 LT samples
330 Completed 32-week follow-up
Treatment Retention
Survival Curves for Buprenorphine Versus Methadone
Buprenorphine (n=738)
1
Methadone (n=529)
0.6
0.4
0.2
168
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
Survival
0.8
Days in treatment during 24 weeks
1
Treatment Retention by Dose
Comparing Retention at 24 Weeks by Maximum Dose of
Medication Prescribed
0-40
mg methadone (max)
41-60
61-80
81-120
100%
121+
17.0%
23.4%
35.6%
% of completion
80%
60%
40%
20%
15.3%
8.7%
27.9%
26.8%
27.6%
5.8%
11.8%
0%
0-10
12-14
16-20
22-28
mg buprenorphine (max)
30-32
Buprenorphine (% = % of buprenorphine participants prescribed in that dose range)
Methadone (% = % of methadone participants prescribed in that dose range)
Opiate Positives by Dose
Average Weekly Dose and Positive Opiate over Weeks in Treatment
(n=1,267)
Buprenorphine dose (n=738)
Opiate positive among BUP patients
Methadone dose (n=529)
Opiate positive among MET patients
100
80
60
40
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
0
Week in Treatment
HIV Injection Risk Behavior

Risk Behavior Survey completed at baseline,
week 12, week 24
Needle Sharing in Past 30 Days
among Week 24 Completers:
Baseline (%) Week 24 (%)
p
Bup/Nx (n=340)
14.4
2.4
<.0001
MET (n=391)
14.1
4.8
<.0001
HIV Sexual Risk Behavior

Risk Behavior Survey completed at baseline,
week 12, week 24
Multiple Sexual Partners in Past 30 Days
among Week 24 Completers:
Baseline (%) Week 24 (%)
p
Bup/Nx (n=340)
6.8
5.2
<.04
MET (n=391)
8.2
5.1
<.04
MAT for Opioid Addiction
Methadone and Buprenorphine
Conclusions

Relapse rates are high without MAT

Methadone and Buprenorphine both efficacious
and reduce mortality

Methadone and Buprenorphine both reduce
HIV risk behaviors
Related documents