Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Highlighting a Few Key Ideas and Issues M&M: Equity = Debt Value of firm projects matters a lot more than small differences in costs of funds Breaks down at high debt/income ratios 1970s: Changes in earnings (numerator) is the driver 2000s: Changes in risk (denominator) is the driver Manager Warnings Rapid shifts over time possible with variable denominator P-E Ratios (or P/GDP) as Long Run Predictor ▪ High P/E = current risk assessment overly optimistic ▪ Low P/E = current risk assessment overly pessimistic 50 20 2000 45 40 14 1929 30 12 1901 25 10 1966 Price-Earnings Ratio 20 21.92 8 15 6 1921 10 5 0 1860 4 Long-Term Interest Rates 1880 1900 2 1920 1940 Year 1960 1980 2000 0 2020 Long-Term Interest Rates Price-Earnings Ratio (CAPE) 16 1981 35 18 .35 70 SP500/GDP (left scale) .30 60 .25 50 SP500/Earnings (right scale) .20 40 .15 30 .10 20 .05 10 .00 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 Fed & Rates: Taylor Rule Target Rate = 2 + 0.5*(Actual Inflation – Target Inflation) + 0.5*(Actual GDP – Potential GDP) Markets & Rates: Fisher Equation Observed Rates = Real Rates + Expected Inflation ▪ Real Rates influenced by economic growth (higher when growth higher) ▪ Estimate of Real Rate: TIPS (See Bloomberg Rates) ▪ Expected inflation influenced by Fed actions and velocity of money Policy Limits: No interest rate “knob” for Fed; influences with money creation “Insurance” for system-wide panics 1970s: Impact of expected inflation 2008: Real rates collapse Responses: Limit new projects; Put off new hires; Pull back credit … The Treasury Yield Curve: Steep: High growth or inflation expected Flat/Inverted: Low growth or inflation expected US Treasury Site "Living Yield Curve" 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 Response: Limit risk; increase liquidity; cash in fixed price assets; no new projects; secure longer term deals; … 6 FannieFreddie 5 LehmanBear Stearns AIG 4 3 2 1 KC-FSI LIBOR-Tbill 0 -1 2006 2007 2008 2009 4 3 07-08 2 Kuwati Invasion Asian Debt 1 0 -1 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 Nominal 10Nominal Rate Inflation Indexed Rate 200 160 120 80 180 170 40 160 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 08M01 08M07 09M01 09M07 10M01 1.1 130 1.0 $ per AU$ FX per US$ 0.9 120 110 0.8 100 0.7 90 0.6 80 0.5 70 0.4 60 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 4.0 60000 3.5 50000 3.0 40000 2.5 30000 Debt/GDP - left scale 2.0 20000 1.5 10000 U.S. Debt -- right scale 1.0 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 4.0 3.5 Total Debt/GDP 3.0 2.5 2.0 Non-house-govt/gdp 1.5 1.0 House-debt/gdp 0.5 Govt Debt/gdp 0.0 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 Cheap Credit Public Sector Backing (Fannie, Freddie, Homeownership) High Leverage (Assets/Equity) for Investment Banks (Bear, Lehman, Merrill …) + AIG Banks Lending on 25 years of growth/repayment Foreign Investment in US NOTARIETY BUT TOO SMALL ▪ Securitization (Collateralized Debt: CDOs) ▪ Derivatives (Credit Default Swaps) ▪ Market-to-Market Accounting Mortgage-related securities marked-to-market daily Immediately begin to reflect deteriorating conditions in 2007 Commercial loans on bank books valued by banks at their PV of expected cash flow Widespread writing down of these loans doesn’t begin until 2009, giving appearance that mortgage market problems causing these problems Problems already developing coincidental with mortgage problems in 2007-08