Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
GDP and the Standard of living Outline: 1. Functions of National Income Accounting 2. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) 3. The Expenditure Approach to GDP 4. The Income Approach to GDP 5. Value added 6. Real versus Nominal GDP 7. Limitations of GDP as a measure of the standard of living National income accounting (NIA) is the measurement of aggregate or total economic activity. NIA is useful for assessing the performance of the macroeconomy. NIA is also helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of policy initiatives such as the Bush tax cuts. Stocks vs. Flows We measure stock variables at a specific point in time; whereas flows are measured per unit of time. Stocks include: •Checking account balance •Balance owed on student loans •Inventories Flows include: •Income •Sales revenue •Output We measure economic activity as a flow. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) GDP is the market value final goods and services produced within a country in a given time period. GDP is our basic measure of economic activity Three approaches to measuring GDP The value-added approach The expenditure approach The income approach Value-added is the increase in the market value of a good that takes place at each stage of the production -distribution process. $1.00 Wood Chips Lumber Mill $1.50 Raw Paper Paper Mill $2.25 Notebook Paper Office Supplies Manufacturer $3.50 Notebook Paper Wholesaler $5.00 Notebook Paper Retailer Summing the value-added at each stage Stage Lumber milling Value Added $1.00 Paper processing .50 Office Supply Manufacturing .75 Wholesaling 1.25 Retailing 1.50 Total $5.00 To count the notebook in GDP, we count the final transaction only. Otherwise, we would be counting value added twice. We count only final goods—that is, a good or service produced for a final user—in GDP. The value of intermediate goods and services are automatically included when the count the value of the final good or service. The expenditure approach Total Expenditure = C + I + G + NX Here we simply add up all expenditures for final goods and services in one year Where, C is personal consumption expenditure; I is gross private domestic investment; G is government expenditure (local, state, and federal); and NX is net exports, or Exports minus Imports Consumption Household spending for newlyproduced goods and services is defined as consumption. We distinguish between 3 categories or types: Spending for consumer durables Spending for consumer nondurables Spending for consumer services. Consumer Spending by Type, 2002 (in billions) Category Durables Spending in 2002 Percent (billions) of Total $872.4 12 Nondurables 2,113.9 29 Services 4,314.5 59 Source:Bureau of Economic Analysis Total consumption by U.S. households in 2002 was $7.3 trillion What is investment? All spending by business firms for newly built equipment and business structures. All changes in business inventories of raw materials, semifinished articles, and finished goods. All spending by households for newly constructed residential housing Components of Business Fixed Investment, 2002 (billions/percent of total) Hous ing 269. 30 / 17.0% Equip. & Software 470. 90 / 29.7% Business St ructures 847. 60 / 53.4% Source: www.bea.gov Investment does NOT include •The purchase of stocks, bonds, or other financial assets. •Secondhand sales Remember that investment only happens when there is production of new tangible capital goods Business investment has been slumping lately GDP: The Expenditure Approach Amount in 2002 Percentage Symbol (billions) of GDP Consumption expenditure C 7,255 69.9 Investment I 1,588 15.3 Government purchases G 1960 18.9 NX -426 -4.1 Y 10,377 100 Item Net exports GDP Source: U.S. Bureau of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis The income Approach GDP = This mainly involves summing up income earned in factor markets Employee compensation + net interest + rent + profits + proprietors’ income + Capital consumption + (indirect business taxes – subsidies) Definitions Capital consumption (CC):A monetary measure of the depreciation of the capital stock in a year due to normal wear and tear, fires, or other accidents. Net Investment: Gross Investment minus CC. Indirect business taxes: taxes collected by businesses for government units, such as taxes on entertainment, motels, groceries, liquor, cigarettes, or gasoline taxes. Also called excise taxes. GDP: The Income Approach Amount in 2002 Percentage (billions) of GDP 5,964 57.5 Rental income of persons 153 1.5 Net interest 678 6.5 Corporate profits 785 7.6 Proprietors' income 747 7.2 8,327 80.3 660 6.4 Capital Consumption 1,390 13.3 GDP 10,377 100 Item Compensation of employees Net domestic product at factor cost Indirect taxes less subsidies Source: U.S. Bureau of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis Real versus Nominal GDP •We use money to measure the market value of new goods and services produced produced in the economy. •The value (or purchasing power) of money is subject to change over time. •Hence we need to adjust nominal GDP (that is, GDP measured at current prices) for changes in the value of money. •GDP adjusted for changes in the value of money is called real GDP. Nominal GDP Calculation To calculate nominal GDP in 2002, sum the expenditures on apples and oranges in 2002 as follows: Expenditure on apples = 100 × $1 Expenditure on oranges = 200 × $0.50 Nominal GDP = $100 + $200 = $100 = $100 = $200 Now we will calculate nominal GDP for 2003 and compare Expenditure on apples = 160 × $0.50 Expenditure on oranges = 220 × $2.25 Nominal GDP = $80 + $495 Our problem is that the nominal GDP figures do not give us an accurate read of period-to-period changes in actual production. Notice that a part of the change in nominal GDP from 2002 to 2003 resulted from a change in prices. = $80 = $495 = $575 “Traditional” Real GDP calculation The traditional method converts nominal GDP to real GDP by measuring GDP in all periods at “base period prices” To correct for changes in the value of money , we will establish 2002 as our base year. That is, we will measure 2003 output at 2002 prices. Traditional method: measuring 2003 GDP at 2002 prices Expenditure on apples = 160 × $1.00 Expenditure on oranges = 220 × $0.50 Nominal GDP = $80 + $495 Thus, real GDP increased from 2002 to 2003—but not by as much as nominal GDP = $160 = $110 = $270 To compute Real GDP (GDP expressed in constant dollars): No min alGDP Re alGDP 100 GDPDeflator Year 1990 1991 Nominal GDP (billions) $5,748.30 5,916.70 GDP Deflator 1996 = 100 86.51 89.66 Real GDP (billions of 1996 dollars) $6,644.67 $6,599.04 New Method of Calculating Real use this method, we must value 2002 output at 2003 GDPToprices and 2003 output at 2002 prices. 2003 Quantities and 2002 Prices Item Quantity Price Apples 160 $1.00 Oranges 220 $0.50 2002Quantities and 2003 Prices Item Quantity Price Apples 100 $0.50 Oranges 200 $2.25 •Measured at 2002 prices, Real GDP increased by 35% from 2002 to 2003 [($70/$200) × 100] •Measured at 2003 prices, real GDP increased by 15% from 2002 to 2003 [($75/$500) × 100] The next step is to average together the percentage increases for 2002 and 2003. Thus we have: 35% 15% Re alGDP 25% 2 Therefore, since real GDP in 2002 is $200, this chain-weighted method of converting nominal to real GDP gives us real GDP in 2003 of $250. GDP in the United States (in millions) 8000 www.bea.gov 6000 4000 2000 0 60 65 70 75 80 Nominal GDP 85 90 95 Chained 1996 dollars GDP per Person in the United States 35000 www.economagic.com 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 60 65 70 75 80 Nominal 85 90 95 Chained 1996 dollars GDP in the U.S. (millions of chained 1996 dollars) 7000 Recessions are shaded www.bea.gov 6000 Notice that real GDP decreased in 1991 5000 4000 3000 2000 70 75 80 85 90 95 Limitations of (real) GDP as a measure of the standard of living •Household production •The underground economy •Leisure time •Environment quality