Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The public finances Robert Chote Carl Emmerson Christine Frayne The Chancellor’s fiscal rules • ‘Golden rule’ • only borrow to invest • on average over the economic cycle • Sustainable investment rule • net debt below 40% of national income • every year of current economic cycle 10–11 09–10 08–09 07–08 06–07 05–06 04–05 03–04 02–03 01–02 00–01 44 99–00 46 98–99 97–98 96–97 Percentage of national income Public finances under Labour Revenues Total spending Current spending 42 40 38 36 34 Source: HM Treasury Returning to surplus? Financial Growth in Output year economy gap Current budget surplus cyclical structural total 2005–06 –0.9 2006–07 –0.3 2007–08 0.0 2008–09 0.5 2009–10 0.7 2010–11 0.8 Source: HM Treasury Returning to surplus? Financial Growth in Output year economy gap cyclical structural total 1¾% –1.4 –0.8 –0.1 –0.9 2005–06 Current budget surplus 2006–07 –0.3 2007–08 0.0 2008–09 0.5 2009–10 0.7 2010–11 0.8 Source: HM Treasury Returning to surplus? Financial Growth in Output Current budget surplus year economy gap cyclical structural total 2005–06 1¾% –1.4 –0.8 –0.1 –0.9 2006–07 2¼% –1.5 –0.3 2007–08 3% –0.7 0.0 2008–09 2¾% –0.1 0.5 2009–10 2¼% 0 0.7 2010–11 2¼% 0 0.8 Source: HM Treasury Returning to surplus? Financial Growth in Output Current budget surplus year economy gap cyclical structural total 2005–06 1¾% –1.4 –0.8 –0.1 –0.9 2006–07 2¼% –1.5 –1.0 0.7 –0.3 2007–08 3% –0.7 –0.7 0.7 0.0 2008–09 2¾% –0.1 –0.2 0.7 0.5 2009–10 2¼% 0 0 0.7 0.7 2010–11 2¼% 0 0 0.8 0.8 Source: HM Treasury 2009Q2 2008Q2 2007Q2 2006Q2 2005Q2 2004Q2 2003Q2 2002Q2 2001Q2 2000Q2 1999Q2 1998Q2 1997Q2 1996Q2 % of potential output A seven year cycle? 2.0 Budget 05: 1999–2000 to 2005–06 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 Source: HM Treasury A twelve year cycle? 2.0 PBR 05: 1997–98 to 2008–09 1.0 0.0 -1.0 2009Q2 2008Q2 2007Q2 2006Q2 2005Q2 2004Q2 2003Q2 2002Q2 2001Q2 2000Q2 1999Q2 1998Q2 1997Q2 -2.0 1996Q2 % of potential output Budget 05: 1999–2000 to 2005–06 Source: HM Treasury A twelve year cycle? 2.0 PBR 05: 1997–98 to 2008–09 1.0 0.0 -1.0 2009Q2 2008Q2 2007Q2 2006Q2 2005Q2 2004Q2 2003Q2 2002Q2 2001Q2 2000Q2 1999Q2 1998Q2 1997Q2 -2.0 1996Q2 % of potential output Budget 05: 1999–2000 to 2005–06 Source: HM Treasury Current budget balance New estimated cycle 4.0 Previous estimated cycle 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 Outturns -3.0 10–11 09–10 06–07 05–06 04–05 03–04 02–03 01–02 00–01 99–00 98–99 97–98 96–97 08–09 PBR 05 forecast -4.0 07–08 Percentage of national income 5.0 Source: HM Treasury Meeting the golden rule? 1999–2000 to 2005–06 Average surplus over current cycle (%GDP) Cumulative surplus (£bn 2005-06 GDP terms) –0.0% –£1.9 Source: HM Treasury Meeting the golden rule? Average surplus over current cycle (%GDP) Cumulative surplus (£bn 2005-06 GDP terms) 1999–2000 to 2005–06 –0.0% –£1.9 1997–98 to 2005–06 +0.1% +£10.8 Source: HM Treasury Meeting the golden rule? Average surplus over current cycle (%GDP) Cumulative surplus (£bn 2005-06 GDP terms) 1999–2000 to 2005–06 –0.0% –£1.9 1997–98 to 2005–06 +0.1% +£10.8 1997–98 to 2008–09 +0.1% +£12.8 Source: HM Treasury Meeting the golden rule? Average surplus over current cycle (%GDP) Cumulative surplus (£bn 2005-06 GDP terms) Current budget balance: first year of next cycle 1999–2000 to 2005–06 –0.0% –£1.9 –0.9% 1997–98 to 2005–06 +0.1% +£10.8 –0.9% 1997–98 to 2008–09 +0.1% +£12.8 +0.5% Source: HM Treasury Recent forecasting errors Percentage of national income 2.5 Treasury estimates of current budget surplus Previous year’s Budget In-year Pre-Budget Report Actual 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0 99–00 00–01 01–02 02–03 03–04 Financial year 04–05 05–06 Source: HM Treasury 100% Probability with 3 years of cycle remaining 80% 60% 50/50 chance 40% 20% 0% -0.30 -0.25 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 Probability of meeting golden rule Will the golden rule be met? Expected average CB surplus over cycle (% of GDP) Source: HM Treasury; IFS 100% Probability with 3 years of cycle remaining 80% 60% 40% 50/50 chance PBR 2005, +£12.8bn = 58% 20% 0% -0.30 -0.25 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 Probability of meeting golden rule Will the golden rule be met? Expected average CB surplus over cycle (% of GDP) Source: HM Treasury; IFS 100% Probability with 3 years of cycle remaining 80% 60% 40% 50/50 chance PBR 2002, +£59.0bn = 82% PBR 2005, +£12.8bn = 58% 20% 0% -0.30 -0.25 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 Probability of meeting golden rule Will the golden rule be met? Expected average CB surplus over cycle (% of GDP) Source: HM Treasury; IFS The Chancellor’s fiscal rules • ‘Golden rule’ • only borrow to invest • on average over the economic cycle • Sustainable investment rule • net debt below 40% of national income • every year of current economic cycle 10–11 09–10 08–09 07–08 06–07 05–06 04–05 03–04 02–03 01–02 00–01 99–00 98–99 97–98 Percentage of national income Will the investment rule be met? 60 50 Central 40 30 20 Ceiling 10 0 Financial year Source: HM Treasury; IFS 60 80% 60% 40% 20% Central 20% 40% 60% 80% Ceiling 50 40 30 20 10 10–11 09–10 08–09 07–08 06–07 05–06 04–05 03–04 02–03 01–02 00–01 99–00 98–99 0 97–98 Percentage of national income Will the investment rule be met? Financial year Source: HM Treasury; IFS Reforming the fiscal framework • Both fiscal rules appropriate rules of thumb • ‘Golden rule’ • more forward-looking measure preferable • Net debt rule • wider measure might aid transparency • comprehensive measure potentially meaningless Green Budget forecasts • Green Budget forecast • slightly weaker revenues in medium-term • assumes 2007 CSR envelope as PBR 2005 Green Budget forecasts • Green Budget forecast • slightly weaker revenues in medium-term • assumes 2007 CSR envelope as PBR 2005 • 50% chance of missing golden rule • 44% chance of missing SIR in 2008–09 Green Budget forecasts • Green Budget forecast • slightly weaker revenues in medium-term • assumes 2007 CSR envelope as PBR 2005 • 50% chance of missing golden rule • 44% chance of missing SIR in 2008–09 • Budget judgement • case for further £2½ billion tightening • larger tax increase required if smaller spending cut delivered over 2007 CSR period Little difference in 2005–06 £ billion PBR Dec. 2005 GB Jan. 2006 Difference Current receipts 483.0 483.1 0.1 Current expenditure 493.6 493.6 0.0 Current budget surplus –10.6 –10.5 0.1 Net investment 26.3 26.3 0.0 PSNB 37.0 36.8 –0.2 Source: HM Treasury; IFS Receipts forecasts Percentage of national income 42 Treasury December 2005 Pre-Budget Report forecast Green Budget January 2006 forecast 41 40 39 38 37 04–05 05–06 06–07 07–08 08–09 Financial year 09–10 10–11 Source: HM Treasury; IFS Treasury forecast optimistic? 200 Corporate tax receipts Stockmarket profits HM Treasury CT forecast Morgan Stanley profits forecast 180 Index, 1997 = 100 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Analysis by Graham Secker, Morgan Stanley Research 2010e 2009e 2008e 2007e 2006e 2005e 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 0 Current spending forecasts Percentage of national income 42 Treasury December 2005 Pre-Budget Report forecast Green Budget January 2006 forecast 2007 CSR constant spending 41 40 39 38 37 04–05 05–06 06–07 07–08 08–09 Financial year 09–10 10–11 Source: HM Treasury; IFS Current budget balance Percentage of national income 3.0 2.0 1.0 HM Treasury, Pre-Budget Report, December 2005 Green Budget, 'cautious' assumptions 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 01–02 02–03 03–04 04–05 05–06 06–07 07–08 08–09 09–10 10–11 Financial year Source: HM Treasury; IFS 100% 80% 60% Probability with 3 years of cycle remaining PBR 2005, +£12.8bn = 58% 50/50 chance 40% 20% 0% -0.30 -0.25 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 Probability of meeting golden rule Will the golden rule be met? Expected average CB surplus over cycle (% of GDP) Source: HM Treasury; IFS 100% 80% 60% 40% Probability with 3 years of cycle remaining PBR 2005, +£12.8bn = 58% 50/50 chance GB 2006, –£0.7bn = 50% 20% 0% -0.30 -0.25 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 Probability of meeting golden rule Will the golden rule be met? Expected average CB surplus over cycle (% of GDP) Source: HM Treasury; IFS Will the SIR be met? Chance of debt exceeding SIR limit HMT PBR 2005 2006–07 1% 2007–08 24% 2008–09 37% Source: HM Treasury; IFS Will the SIR be met? Chance of debt exceeding SIR limit HMT PBR 2005 IFS Green Budget 2006 2006–07 1% 2% 2007–08 24% 31% 2008–09 37% 44% Source: HM Treasury; IFS Risks on the downside Percentage of national income 3.0 2.0 1.0 Current budget balance HM Treasury, Pre-Budget Report, December 2005 Green Budget, 'cautious' assumptions Green Budget, Morgan Stanley 'central' forecast Green Budget, Morgan Stanley 'worse case' scenario 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 01–02 02–03 03–04 04–05 05–06 06–07 07–08 08–09 09–10 10–11 Financial year Source: HM Treasury; IFS Budget judgement • Last two Green Budgets called for tightening of £11–£13 billion • 2005 PBR announced £3 billion tax increase, and pencilled in £8½ billion spending cut • 2006 Green Budget suggests case for modest further tax increase of £2½ billion • assumes provisional spending plans inked in • larger tax increase required if smaller spending cut delivered over 2007 CSR period