Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
RUSSIAN FAR EAST TEAM CONTRIBUTION TO AES PROJECT Asian Energy Security (AES) Project Asian Energy Security Workshop 2006 6 to 7 November, 2006, Beijing, China RFE Team Members: Ruslan Gulidov, Victor Kalashnikov, Alexander Ognev [Presented for Team by David Von Hippel, Nautilus Institute] 1 RFE AES CONTRIBUTION: PROJECT TEAM AND ROLES Dr. Victor Kalashnikov: Overall supervisor of Russian team Develops the strategic framework of the LEAP modeling activities and follow-up analysis of the results Defines basic qualitative and quantitative assumptions of the scenarios implemented Resolves various theoretical problems Dr. Alexander Ognev: Advisor for all general and specific issues related to the RFE electric power industry Mr. Ruslan Gulidov: Modeler Collects and processes data, inputs to LEAP model Creates and examines LEAP scenarios for RFE energy sector based on advice from other members 2 RFE AES CONTRIBUTION: RFE ENERGY SECTOR OVERVIEW RFE Energy Sector Generating, transmission & distribution companies, marketing and management bodies of the electric power industry Coal-mining industry (in all territories of the RFE) Oil and gas industries (Yakutia, Sakhalin, Kamchatka, Chukotka) Refining industry (mostly in Khabarovskiy Krai, but also in Sakhalin and Yakutia) Characterized by huge distances, low level of development, non-uniform and dispersed character of the development of RFE's economy 20+ "energy districts" independent in power supply, energy sectors based on local resources. With some imports from elsewhere in RFE Favorable conditions for concentration of energy production and centralization of energy transportation and distribution Power grid: Integrated Power System of the East (OES Vostoka). 3 RFE AES WORK: RFE ENERGY SITUATION Energy production in the Russian Far East in Recent Years Index Electricity production, bill kWh Crude oil extraction, mill tons Natural gas extraction, BCM Coal mining, mill tons Oil Refining, mill tons 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 38.8 39.0 38.6 38.9 40.1 3.8 4.2 3.6 3.6 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.6 28.3 6.3 28.2 6.7 30.1 7.4 30.7 9.1 31.8 8.8 4 RFE AES WORK: RFE ENERGY SITUATION Energy industry accounts for more than 10% of regional GDP, 28% of industrial output, employs 4% of economically active population Investments in modernization and development of energy sector in 2003-2004 > 50% of total capital investments in region’s economy Implementation of large-scale, capital-intensive projects -- “Sakhalin-1”, “Sakhalin-2”, Bureiskaya hydropower power plant 5 Anadir' Bilibino Kolymskaya HPP Arkagalinskaya TPP Magadan Petropavlovskiy "energy district" Yakutsk Viluyskiy "energy district" Okha Nikolaevsk-on-Amur Nerungrinskaya TPP Bratsk Zeyskaya HPP Komsomolsky centre Sakhalinskaya TPP Bureyskaya Mayskaya HPP (under construction) TPP Chita 3 Primorskaya TPP 1 Gusinoozerskaya TPP Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk Khabarovsk 2 Kharanorskaya TPP Ulan-Ude ЯПОНИЯ MONGOLIA Yuzhno-Primorsky centre CHINA LEGEND MAJOR CENTRES OF POWER GENERATION Fuel and energy types Installed generating capacity, MW 50-100 500-1000 100-200 Coal Nuclear Fuel Oil Geothermal Natural gas Hydro ZONES AND REGIONS OF CENTRALIZED POWER SUPPLY More than 1000 200-500 OES Sibiri OES Vostoka BACKBONE TRANSMISSION LINES 500 кV Autonomous energy regions ELECTRICITY SUPPLIES OUTSIDE THE REGION 220 кV Operating 6 Planned for construction Numbered: 1 – Krasnokamensk CHP, 2 - Blagoveschenskaya CHP, 3 - Raychikhinskaya TPP RFE AES WORK: RFE ENERGY SITUATION RFE'2002 Primary Energy Production 29.7 mln tce Natural Gas 13.8% Crude Oil 17.7% Renewables 8.6% Nuclear 0.2% Coal 59.7% 7 RFE AES WORK: RFE ENERGY SITUATION RFE'2002 Primary Energy Consumption 37.6 mln tce Natural Gas 10.9% Coal 44.1% Other Renewables 3.6% Nuclear 0.2% 8 Hydropower 3.2% Oil&Oil Products 38.0% RFE ENERGY SITUATION, RECENT TRENDS Growing signs of stabilization in current energy supplies in RFE since 2002, due to solution of financial problems related to payments for energy products and services 2003-2004, ratio of RFE and Russian average tariffs stabilized at 1.6 for electricity, 1.8 for heating Regional energy companies operated at a profit in 2004 Cross-subsidies between consumer groups, inter-regional subsidies in wholesale electricity sales still exist Coal industry stabilizing gradually with closing of unprofitable mines; share of coal in underground mines in RFE in 2004 fell to 10% from 26.1 % in 1991 Increasing demand in energy industries for equipment renovation of outdated and obsolete equipment 9 RFE ENERGY SITUATION, RECENT TRENDS Bureiskaya HPP (designed capacity of 2000 MW, average generation 7.1 TWh/yr) unit additions to total of 1005 MW To transfer power from Bureiskaya HPP, construction of high voltage transmission lines continues Increasing electric load on TPP in “OES Vostoka” grid, increased Bureiskaya HPP output by 2007 will decrease average electricity prices Mergers, takeovers and processes of vertical integration of assets, restructuring of RFE coal and power industries 2005-2007--Unified holding company created for RFE electricity sector (existing and new) controlled (over 52%) by Federal government 10 RFE ENERGY SITUATION, RECENT TRENDS Phase out of coal facilities in some territories of RFE and Transbaikalia as Sakhalin gas comes to market Northern/NE territories of RFE self-sufficient in coal supply, import petroleum as refined products from Khabarovsk area 11 RFE ENERGY SITUATION, RECENT TRENDS Highly likely that major projects in the energy sector will shift the trade balance of primary energy towards export supplies to international and interregional markets of crude oil, LNG and coking coal, and electricity to “isolated districts” in Northeast China. Despite overall good prospects for supply in RFE, there are continuing problems of “small” communal utilities (electricity and heat supply) Neglect and malfunctioning of production facilities and engineering infrastructure, unresolved financial problems 12 RFE ENERGY SITUATION, RECENT TRENDS Stationary “small” power industry varies both technologically and in respect to its manageability. For communal heat supply alone in the RFE there are more than 5300 municipal heating plants, which generate about 25 million gigacalories. Positive examples of vertical integration of communal energy utilities, form basis for structural reforms in communal services. Strategic position of RFE in North-East Asia energy sector is being restructured, strengthened Construction/investment activities for implementing the “Sakhalin-1” and “Sakhalin-2” projects mean doubling primary energy production in RFE by 2008 net energy exporter, supplying crude oil, LNG to energy markets of Northeast Asia 13 RFE ENERGY SITUATION, RECENT TRENDS End 2004 RF Government approved a framework project for construction of Taishet – Scovorodino – Perevoznaya Bay Oil Pipeline (the East Siberia – Pacific Ocean Project – ESPO project) first section is to be completed by second half of 2008, with throughput of 30 Mte crude oil Oil terminal in Perevoznaya Bay is to be finished by second half of 2008, with similar throughput 2005, RF Government of Russia Federation re-orienting Kovyktinskoye gas project to meet domestic gas needs in W. RF, thus excluding it from NEA market, probably meaning a focus on the triangle "Sakhalin shelf – Northeast China – the Korean Peninsula“ for exports 14 RFE ENERGY SITUATION, RECENT TRENDS 2004 and 2005 Exxon Neftegas (operator of the Sakhalin1 project) in commercial negotiations on pipeline gas supply to Northeast China via Khabarovsk Krai, 8-10 BCM/year Gazprom negotiating with operator of the Sakhalin-1 project to obtain 25% share, which may speed development of international connections Completion of Bureiskaya HPP construction, power availability in “OES Vostoka” created preconditions for export-oriented power industry, but so far only strong activities in near-border power trade (negotiations on 600 MW power lines from Blagoveschensk to Kheikhe) 15 POSSIBLE COOPERATIVE INITIATIVES: RFE AND NEA "Amur Arc" Project: Planned specialized infrastructure for fuel and energy resources transit, goods transit Oil and gas pipelines High-voltage power lines Trans-Siberian Railway Arc-like energy corridor on the route "Eastern Siberia – Skovorodino – Blagoveshchensk – Khabarovsk and Komsomolsk-on-Amur – south of Primorskiy Krai“ Economic concept of industrial-service development of energy corridor 16 POSSIBLE COOPERATIVE INITIATIVES: RFE AND NEA "Amur Arc" Project: Oil-and-gas projects of the Sakhalin shelf—Sakhalin 1 and 2, onshore and offshore, extraction/processing Oil pipeline “Eastern Siberia – Pacific Ocean” (ESPO) Integrated system of gas production and transportation in Eastern Siberia and the Far East Prospects for electricity cooperation with China: the “Small China” project--Export electricity into “loading islands” – near-border areas/cities of NE China Prospects for electricity cooperation with China: the “Big China” project—25-30 TWh/yr into integrated energy systems of Northeastern and Eastern Chinese provinces 17 POSSIBLE COOPERATIVE INITIATIVES: RFE AND NEA "Amur Arc" Project: Energy bridge "Far East – Korean Peninsula Project induces important external benefits: Improved investment climate in region New technological opportunities for development of joint enterprises for hydrocarbons processing Energy-intensive enterprises based on new efficient hydroelectric power plants, gas- and coal-fired power plants In view of the large scales, investments required, complex effects, planning, implementation, the power supply and pipeline sections of Project require support and coordination of Russian Government 18 LEAP MODELING OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM Information Sources: Current Accounts State Statistics in Russian Far East for Petroleum, electricity product supply and balances Customs data on imports and exports Statistics on social and economic indicators Russia’s regional fuel and energy complexes Provincial government data sources Data from private companies; such as "Unified Power Grid of Russia“ Information from experts in Energy Departments of territorial administrations of subregions of RFE Estimates of research fellows of Institutes in region 19 LEAP MODELING OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM Information Sources: Paths/Scenarios Official materials from government authorities, private companies Economic and social development projections Demographic forecasts Plans for energy and other infrastructure Reports and papers on futures of energy industries of RFE (Russian and International publications) Coal, gas, petroleum extraction industries Hydroelectric development Other materials: RF-wide projections/futures documents, regional experts, company publications 20 LEAP MODELING OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM Data Gaps and Challenges Little demand data except for electricity—no energy balance since 1990, errors in data that do exist Energy supply data good for most sources, with the exception of heat production units International export and import data available, but information on imports/export to/from other parts of RF lacking Cost data generally had to be estimated 21 LEAP MODELING OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM Structure of RFE LEAP dataset General economic assumptions (exogenous parameters) GDP growth rates, industrial output growth rates population dynamics, Economic cooperation: RFE (and RF), other NEA countries Driving factors of energy policy (key variables) Necessary and cost-effective energy supply/demand in RFE Regional energy cooperation Environmental standards and constraints, Investment limitations, availability of advanced energy technologies Energy conservation/energy efficiency policy Role of renewable sources of energy Diversification of primary energy demand and supply in RFE 22 LEAP MODELING OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM Structure of RFE LEAP dataset Demand: no sectoral structure, just final demand by fuel, with fuel demand by geographic area for natural gas, heat, electricity, crude oil (sector division planned) Transformation (multiple modules for geographic areas): Heat and Electricity T&D modules 5 Export Transmission Line modules 6 Electricity Generation modules, alternating with 6 Heat Generation modules Pipeline Oil Export, 4 Oil Refining modules Coal Washing, Gas Processing, LNG Production Modules Natural Gas T&D, 2 Crude Oil Production modules Pipeline Gas Export, 4 Natural Gas Extraction Modules Modules for Bituminous and Lignite Coal Production 23 LEAP MODELING OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM Structure of RFE LEAP dataset: Paths Cool attitude to energy-efficient technologies Weak deployment of renewables Coal dominance Not available Regional Alternative Reference Scenario National Alternative Moderate GDP growth, No Real international cooperation 24 Intensive introducing energy-efficient technologies Wide use of renewables Switching to natural gas LEAP MODEL OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM: PATHS AND RESULTS LEAP Paths (“Scenarios”) Reference Case: extrapolation of currently evolving economy/energy sector trends Moderate economic growth, slowing of population decrease Energy supply priorities sufficient production of energy and fuels at minimal costs self-sufficient energy balance Coal and petroleum products will remain balance compensators Stagnation in the sphere of international economic cooperation with NEA and Pacific Rim: only Sakhalin-1 and Sakhalin-2 projects realized 25 LEAP MODEL OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM: PATHS AND RESULTS 70 Reference Primary Energy Demand 60 mln TCE 50 Others 40 Hydro 30 Natural Gas 20 Coal Petroleum 10 0 2005 2010 2015 2020 26 2030 mln TCE LEAP MODEL OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM: PATHS AND RESULTS 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reference Primary Energy Production Others Crude Oil Hydropower Natural Gas Solid Fuels 2002 2005 2010 2015 27 2020 2030 LEAP MODELING OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM LEAP Paths (“Scenarios”) National Alternative Case: Similar to Reference Case: extrapolation of currently evolving economy/energy sector trends, but… More dynamic development of renewable energy sources, more active energy efficiency policy, switching from oil and coal to natural gas New energy priorities nominally supposed to be supported with legislative acts, administrative directives but regional and local business unable to carry out in full Stagnation in the sphere of international economic cooperation with NEA and Pacific Rim: only Sakhalin-1 and Sakhalin-2 projects realized 28 LEAP MODEL OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM: PATHS AND RESULTS NA Primary Energy Demand 60 mln TCE 50 Others Hydro 40 30 Natural Gas 20 Coal Petroleum 10 0 2005 2010 2015 2020 29 2030 LEAP MODELING OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM LEAP Paths (“Scenarios”) Regional Alternative Case: Fast integration/ transformation of RFE into "the Russian center of fuel and energy production and supplies within NEA“ Implement energy integration of Russia into NEA Projects in the southern zone of RFE core source for optimization of energy usage in the territory International cooperation, sound domestic policy yield rapid economic growth, slowing of the rate of population decrease increase from 2015 due to migration and international labor Priorities of energy policy: sufficient production of energy and fuels at acceptable costs, large-scale energy export, active diversification of energy consumption to hydro and other renewables, intensive switching to natural gas; joint regional programs on energy efficiency, environmental protection. 30 LEAP MODEL OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM: PATHS AND RESULTS RA Primary Energy Demand 90 80 mln TCE 70 60 Others 50 Hydro Natural Gas 40 30 Coal Petroleum 20 10 0 2005 2010 2015 2020 31 2030 LEAP MODEL OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM: PATHS AND RESULTS RA Primary Energy Production 250 mln TCE 200 Others Crude Oil Hydropower Natural Gas Solid Fuels 150 100 50 0 2005 2010 2020 2015 32 2030 LEAP MODEL OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM: PATHS AND RESULTS Final Energy Demand by Scenarios 60 Reference Scenario National Alternative Regional Alternative mln TCE 50 40 30 20 10 0 2005 2010 2015 33 2020 2030 LEAP MODEL OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM: PATHS AND RESULTS Primary Energy Production by Scenarios 250 mln TCE 200 Reference Scenario National Alternative Regional Alternative 150 100 50 0 2005 2010 2015 34 2020 2030 LEAP MODEL OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM: PATHS AND RESULTS Electricity Net Output by Scenarios 160 Reference Scenario National Alternative Regional Alternative billion kWh 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2005 2010 2015 35 2020 2030 LEAP MODEL OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM: PATHS AND RESULTS mln tones CO2 Equivalent Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Scenarios 160 140 120 Reference Scenario National Alternative Regional Alternative 100 80 60 40 20 0 2005 2010 2015 36 2020 2030 LEAP MODEL OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM: PATHS AND RESULTS billion USD 2002 Cumulative Discounted Costs by Scenarios 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Reference Scenario National Alternative Regional Alternative 2005 2010 2015 37 2020 2030 LEAP MODEL OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM: PATHS AND RESULTS Energy Supply & Demand Economic Technological Environmental Social and Cultural Military / Security Total Primary Energy Total Energy System Internal Costs Diversification Indices for key industries by technology type GHG emissions (tonnes CO2, CH4 Exposure to Risk of Social, Cultural Conflict over energy systems Exposure to Military / Security Risks Lower in NA Lower in BAU Higher in RA Lower in NA Likely lower in BAU Likely lower in RA Fraction of Primary Energy as Imports Total Fuel Costs Diversity of R&D Spending Acid gas emissions (tonnes SOx, NOx) Relative spending on energyrelated security Lower in RA Lower in RA Likely higher in RA Lower in NA scenario Likely lower in BAU, NA 38 LEAP MODEL OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM: PATHS AND RESULTS Energy Supply & Demand Economic Technological Environmental Diversity of Import Fuel supply by fuel Costs and supplier Reliance on Proven Technologies Ecosystem and Aesthetic Impacts Higher in NA and RA Lower in NA Higher in BAU Lower in BAU Energy Intensity (TPES /GDP) Technological Adaptability Ecology Intensity (GHG/GDP) Lower in NA and RA Higher in RA Lower in RA 39 Social and Cultural Military / Security LEAP MODEL OF RFE ENERGY SYSTEM: PATHS AND RESULTS Energy Supply & Demand Economic Technological Environmental Diversity of Import Fuel supply by fuel Costs and supplier Reliance on Proven Technologies Ecosystem and Aesthetic Impacts Higher in NA and RA Lower in NA Higher in BAU Lower in BAU Energy Intensity (TPES /GDP) Technological Adaptability Ecology Intensity (GHG/GDP) Lower in NA and RA Higher in RA Lower in RA 40 Social and Cultural Military / Security THANK YOU! 41