Download Curriculum Development in Finland

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Curriculum Development in
Finland
Pasi Sahlberg, PhD
Senior Education Specialist
World Bank
1
Brief outlook
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Population: 5.2 million
The most northern corner of the EU
GDP per capita: $26,000
4,100 comprehensive schools (1-9 grades)
475 upper secondary schools
50,000 teachers
Public expenditure on educational
institutions: 5.7 % of the GDP
2
Why curriculum change?
• Situation in the beginning of 1990s
– Teachers rarely used curriculum in their work
– Teachers demanded more freedom
– Teachers’ professional qualifications were
increasing
– Decentralization of public administration
– Central administration didn’t know exactly
how schools could improve performance
– Paradigm shift in understanding learning
3
What was the solution?
• New National Framework Curriculum 1994
– Loose conceptual framework describing
intended experiences rather than content
– Schools were invited to design their own
curricula (but not by Law)
– Increased flexibility and freedom of choice
– Focus on new conception of learning
– Support to schools in curriculum design
4
What happened?
• Schools progressed in different rhythms
• School curricula became very diverse (but
still based on a common core)
• Curriculum became a school improvement
instrument and an active reference for
schools
• Schools created new identities and profiles
• Fundamental curriculum change!
5
Possible impact of 1994 reform
• Focus shifted from individual teachers to
school as a community of professionals
• The hidden potentials in schools, i.e.
motivation, creativity and moral purposes
were released but some got burned-out
• Trusting teachers increased their working
commitments
• Schools became gradually learning centers
6