Download Take-away points for other countries

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Labour Relations in the Netherlands:
On Flexibility and Human Capital Investments
Frank Cörvers
Session 4
Resilient Labor Markets:
Cases of Germany and the Netherlands
Overview
1. Some characteristics of the Netherlands
2. Typical Dutch
3. A resilient labour market?: Analysing the
decrease in unemployment
4. Flexible contracts and trade-off with firmspecific human capital investments
5. Take-away points for other countries
2
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
Most recent figures for the Netherlands
(from the World Bank)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
3
Population
Life expectancy at birth
GNP per capita
Exports of GDP
Labor force with tertiary education
Labor participation rate (15+)
Part time work among women
Unemployment
Youth unemployment
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
16.6 million
81 years
$ 50k
69%
29%
66%
60%
3.4%
6.6%
Sept. 26, 2011
Typical Dutch
• Corporatist system: central level bargaining with
moderate unions at the industry level (-> wage
moderation, agreements on working conditions and
training, pension contributions, etc.)
• Collective labour agreements (CLA’s) concluded at
the industry level are binding for all firms
• Employers can freely choose from dual dismissal
tracks: They can either go to the employment
office or file for permission by the civil court.
• Relative high protection for permanents workers,
low protection for flexible workers
4
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
GDP growth 1970-2010; forecast 2011-2012
10,0
8,0
6,0
4,0
%
2,0
0,0
-4,0
GDP growth
5
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
2
20 1
0
20 1
8
20 0
6
20 0
4
20 0
2
20 0
0
20 0
8
19 9
6
19 9
4
19 9
2
19 9
0
19 9
8
19 8
6
19 8
4
19 8
2
19 8
0
19 8
8
19 7
6
19 7
4
19 7
2
19 7
0
19 7
-2,0
Unemployment shows a structural downward
trend since the middle of the 1980s
10,0
8,0
6,0
4,0
%
2,0
0,0
-4,0
GDP growth
6
unemployment
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
2
20 1
0
20 1
8
20 0
6
20 0
4
20 0
2
20 0
0
20 0
8
19 9
6
19 9
4
19 9
2
19 9
0
19 9
8
19 8
6
19 8
4
19 8
2
19 8
0
19 8
8
19 7
6
19 7
4
19 7
2
19 7
0
19 7
-2,0
Why unemployment went down since the
middle of the 1980s?
• Agreement of Wassenaar (1982) between
government, employment associations and labour
unions: wage moderation for shorter working
weeks; government promised not to intervene in
wage negotiations
• Cuts in government spending and social security
without much opposition of labour unions; decrease
in taxes and social security contributions -> lower
wage costs
• Stricter eligibility criteria for social security benefits
(disability), more financial responsibility for
municipalities (welfare)
7
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
Recent moderate increase in
unemployment was a surprise
• Official forecasts in 2009: unemployment
would rise to about 7% (doubling) or
more...
• In fact we are still a bit puzzled why it
didn’t….
8
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
Possible reasons for moderate increase in
unemployment, despite large fall in GDP
• Very short period of negative growth
• Many vacancies before turndown
• Anticipation on new labour market shortages after
crisis: employers were reluctant to fire highlyqualified personnel
• Many retirees and less young people than before
• Short-time working (in Germany: Kurzarbeit), both
officially and voluntary (without wage compensation)
• Higher % of flexible workers, incl. self-employed,
than before
• (SAB: more discouraged workers and young people
in education, less immigrants, ALMP
9
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
Five contract types in the Dutch labour force
•
•
•
•
•
10
Permanent contracts
Fixed-term contracts (direct hire temporary)
Temporary work agency contracts
On-call contracts
Self-employment without personnel
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
Shares on the labour market
11
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
Regulation since 1999: Flexibility and
Security Act
• With implications for fixed-term contracts,
temporary agency contracts and on-call work
• F&S Act was prepared by social partners and made
into law.
• Aim: increase flexibility for firms and security for
workers.
• More flexibility in ftc, less in on-call work
• More security in twa and on-call
• Deviations are always possible by collective labour
agreements
12
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
Temporary employment as % of dependent
employment
13
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
Self-employment as % of total employment
14
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
Warning: Trade-off between flexibility
and firm-specific training
15
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
Wage penalties on temporary contracts
16
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
The flip side of flexibility
• Some specific groups mainly bear the costs of
labour market flexibility: low-skilled & young
people incl. recent graduates (‘dual labour market’
problem)
• Those groups are faced with job insecurity,
repeated spells of unemployment, wage penalties,
worse job match, poor working conditions and less
training investments
• Differences in protection between permanent and
temporary workers are rather large in the
Netherlands
17
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
Take-away points for other countries
• Corporatist system of labour relations may offer
good elements for other countries
• More labour market flexibility may decrease
unemployment
• But comes at the cost of poor working conditions
and job match for those workers
• Relatively small group of flexible workers is hit in
the Netherlands, which may be prevented by
closing the gap of employment protection between
permanent and temporary contracts
18
Labor Relations in the Netherlands
Sept. 26, 2011
Related documents