Download It`s The Prices Stupid: Why the U.S. is so Different in Health Care

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
It’s The Prices Stupid: Why the
U.S. is so Different in Health
Care from other Countries
Econ. 201 – Econ. Data Analysis
Major Point
• The US is an outlier on spending,
spending more than almost any other rich
industrialized country
• Yet the US gets little in measurable
average health benefit for this extra
spending
Overall Spending
• Look at the U.S. compared to the O.E.C.D.
median in exhibit 1
• We are in GDP per capita, yet we spent
more on health spending by both total
amount and % of GDP
• To see this graphically, look at exhibit 2
Correlation Coefficient
• In probability theory and statistics,
correlation, (often measured as a
correlation coefficient) , indicates the
strength and direction of a linear
relationship between two random variables
Correlation Coefficient
• The correlation is 1 in the case of a perfect
increasing linear relationship, −1 in the case of a
perfect decreasing linear relationship, and some
value in between in all other cases, indicating
the degree of linear dependence between the
variables. The closer the coefficient is to either
−1 or 1, the stronger the correlation between the
variables.
• If the variables are independent then the
correlation is 0
Correlation: Health Spending and
GDP
• In all of the OECD data for 2000 the
correlation is .27
• If Luxembourg is eliminated, it goes to .56
• Many countries vary considerably in health
spending, between GDP per capitas of
$25k and $30k
• You will see this in many health spending
relationships: why?
Health Production Function:
Complex and Multivariable
• Draw on board and explain the health
production function
• Probably not a surprise that rich countries
are on the “flat” of this curve
• U.S. is still an outlier though
Not a New Phenomenon
• Look at average annual growth columns in
exhibit 1
One big difference is % of health
spending that is private
• Define this. What is the alternative?
• Notice it is high in the US, and some of the
poorer countries in the data, Korea
• But the amount of public dollars in health
spending in US is about the same as other
rich OECD countries and the OECD
median
Why?
• #1) Not because the US is getting older
– So are other OECD countries some at a faster
rate than US
• #2) Not because we spend such a high
percentage of health care $ on
pharmaceuticals
– Others spend even more as (see exhibit # 3)
Why do we spend so much, contd
• #3) Not because our Health Care workforce is
especially high
– For various types of labor inputs supplied look at
exhibit #4
– Note though “nurses per acute care bed”
• #4) Not because our health care capital is
especially high
– For various types of non-labor inputs supplied look at
exhibit #5
– Compare with Canada
Continued…
• #5) May be partly because we have
more units of expensive technological
equipment per capita
– See exhibit #6
– Again compare Canada
• Less capital intensive
What is left as an explanation?
• The authors point to higher prices per unit
of medical service in the US
– Higher salaries
– Higher administrative costs of insurance
– Higher cost of capital inputs
– Compared to Germany in 1990: 40% more
spending per capita in US, for 15% less real
health care
Why?
• Less monopsony by purchasers in US
– Disaggregated buyers
• Many insurers for instance
• More monopoly by suppliers in US
– Concentrated providers
• Largely national competitors
– Though watch for Indian surgery and radiology soon
• AMA, Med Schools, Hospitals, big pharma
Continued…
• #5) May be partly because we have more
units of expensive technological
equipment per capita
– See exhibit #6
– Again compare Canada
• Less capital intensive
What is left as an explanation?
• The authors point to higher prices per unit
of medical service in the US
– Higher salaries
– Higher administrative costs of insurance
– Higher cost of capital inputs
– Compared to Germany in 1990: 40% more
spending per capita in US, for 15% less real
health care
Why?
• Less monopsony by purchasers in US
– Disaggregated buyers
• Many insurers for instance
• More monopoly by suppliers in US
– Concentrated providers
• Largely national competitors
– Though watch for Indian surgery and radiology soon
• AMA, Med Schools, Hospitals, big pharma
Related documents