Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Fiscal Policy Miscellaneous Notes Fall 2000 Economics 285 Main Tax Issues • Japan is not a “republic” so the national budget is key. – In contrast, any analysis of the US must focus on state and local government • You need to examine: – The main budget – Supplemental budgets – FILP (Fiscal Investment & Loan Program) Why does it matter? • Taxes distort decisions – Inefficient taxes can be costly! • Ex: a 100% tax generates no revenue but stifles activity! – Taxes can change income distribution • Shouldn’t the rich pay proportionately more? – Taxes can be unfair if random in impact • Shouldn’t people with identical incomes pay identical taxes? Why does it matter (II) • Aggregate levels are part of fiscal policy • Taxes have “feedback” (multiplier) aspects • Deficits (surpluses) affect interest rates • Are current policies sustainable? • Used well? • What are they spent on? • Have they “worked” as fiscal policy? • Is more decentralization desirable? • Local government ability to set priorities Expenditures • How does the Japanese government view its role in society? • The structure of expenditures is one measure of how the government views its role • Need to disentangle “rational” policy from the purely political • Examples • National health care • Construction Are Japanese Taxes High? Comparative Structure Composition of Taxes in Japan Composition Overview of Public Finances Entitlements in Japan Japan’s Old Age Boom: Ratio of Elderly to Population Trend of the Number of Births and the Total Fertility Rate Toward the Future • Japan will have a high “dependency ratio” • Dfn: ratio of working to population • Will approach 1:2 • To maintain current consumption levels for the elderly will entail huge transfers • Will the tax rates needed to do that be politically feasible? • Some projections call for a 25% consumption tax! FILP Fiscal Investment and Loan Program Local Government Income & Expenditures F I L P Some FILP Details Example of FILP in Action: Road Construction Issues • • • • Is fiscal policy effective? Is public investment useful? Are taxes equitable? Do taxes impose small distortions or large one? (“excess burden” is the jargon) Crayon • Small business & farm taxation • Claim: tax evasion is widespread 九・零・四 – Wage earners pay 90% (ku) • Payroll deductions make it hard to evade taxes – Farmers pay no taxes (rei) • Allowed to operate on a cash basis • Never audited – Small business pays 40% (yon) • • • • No requirement to keep books for very small firms Very, very low audit rates Published handbooks to audit triggers Early retirment by tax auditors, to set up tax offices (税理士) Real Estate Taxes • Huge increase in postwar land prices – But only modest capital gains exemption – No deduction if use proceeds to buy new home • Impact – Represses transactions - compared to the US, few sales – Makes it hard to move with job rotations • Many Japanese live apart from their families tanshin funin 単身赴任 • But education, other factors add to reluctance to move Effectiveness • On-again, off-again policies • Expectations matter! • Examples • Consumption vouchers • Temporary tax cuts: April 1997 – Date of future tax increase well publicized! – Coincided with a scheduled increase in the consumption tax (national sales tax) – Deep recession followed Multiplier Analysis Response to a Permanent Increase of Government Investment by 1% of GDP (real variables) 1s t year 2n d year 3rd year Real GDP 1.21 1.31 1.24 Growth Ra te Real GDP 1.21 0.10 -0.08 Cons umption 0.26 0.47 0.66 Private Fi xe d In ve stme nt 0.39 0.97 0.81 Resi dential Cons truction 1.30 0.62 0.45 1s t year 2n d year 3rd year Private GDP Defl ator 0.04 0.19 0.52 Hourl y Wage s 0.22 0.70 1.07 Unem ployme nt -0.07 -0.13 -0.12 Capa city Util izatio n 2.59 2.81 2.70 Fi sca l Defi cit (% of GDP) -0.60 -0.33 -0.31 Exports -0.02 -0.20 -0.63 Im ports 1.66 2.42 3.04 Nomi nal GDP 1.29 1.67 2.04 Lo ng-te rm Curren t Acco unt In teres t rates (% of GDP) 0.08 -0.16 0.24 -0.25 0.35 -0.41 Yen - Do llar Rate -0.06 -0.55 -0.65 Response to a Permanent Personal Income Tax Reduction of 1% of nominal GDP 1s t year 2n d year 3rd year Real GDP 0.41 0.57 0.22 Growth Ra te Real GDP 0.41 0.16 -0.37 Cons umption 0.53 0.57 0.37 Private Fi xe d In ve stme nt 0.81 1.77 0.65 Resi dential Cons truction 0.10 0.34 0.24 1s t year 2n d year 3rd year Private GDP Defl ator 0.01 0.09 0.21 Hourl y Wage s 0.05 0.28 0.37 Unem ployme nt -0.02 -0.06 -0.03 Capa city Util izatio n 0.88 1.15 0.36 Fi sca l Defi cit (% of GDP) -0.89 -0.78 -0.88 Exports 0.56 1.11 0.96 Nomi nal GDP 0.43 0.69 0.49 Lo ng-te rm Curren t Acco unt In teres t rates (% of GDP) 0.03 -0.05 0.11 -0.11 0.14 -0.13 Yen - Do llar Rate -0.02 -0.26 -0.38 0.00 -0.07 -0.23 Im ports More multiplier data October 1998 EPA Domestic Model Response to an Increase in Short-term Interest Rates by 1 percentage point 1s t year 2n d year 3rd year Real GDP -0.09 -0.37 -0.63 Growth Ra te Real GDP -0.09 -0.28 -0.27 Cons umption -0.03 -0.10 -0.14 Private Fi xe d In ve stme nt -0.28 -1.33 -2.28 Resi dential Cons truction -0.25 -0.69 -0.62 1s t year 2n d year 3rd year Private GDP Defl ator -0.02 -0.09 -0.27 Hourl y Wage s -0.01 -0.10 -0.27 Unem ployme nt 0.00 0.02 0.05 Capa city Util izatio n -0.20 -0.77 -1.27 Fi sca l Defi cit (% of GDP) -0.03 -0.16 -0.33 Exports -0.10 -0.50 -0.82 Im ports -0.12 -0.38 -0.28 Nomi nal GDP -0.10 -0.41 -0.77 Lo ng-te rm Curren t Acco unt In teres t rates (% of GDP) 0.27 -0.01 0.40 0.00 0.37 0.03 Yen - Do llar Rate -0.74 -2.19 -2.37 Response to 10% Devaluation of the Yen against the US Dollar 1s t year 2n d year 3rd year Real GDP 0.40 1.06 1.88 Growth Ra te Real GDP 0.40 0.67 0.84 1s t year 2n d year 3rd year Private GDP Defl ator 0.18 0.60 1.08 Hourl y Wage s 0.05 0.33 0.86 Cons umption 0.01 0.10 0.37 Private Fi xe d In ve stme nt 0.77 2.56 4.48 Resi dential Cons truction 0.86 0.18 0.35 Unem ployme nt -0.02 -0.08 -0.15 Capa city Util izatio n 0.88 2.27 3.96 Fi sca l Defi cit (% of GDP) 0.09 0.32 0.67 Exports Im ports 0.15 -0.89 -2.17 Nomi nal GDP 0.41 1.21 2.37 Lo ng-te rm Curren t Acco unt In teres t rates (% of GDP) 0.09 -0.04 0.29 -0.01 0.44 -0.02 Yen - Do llar Rate 10 .00 10 .00 10 .00 1.63 3.19 3.87 Usefulness of Investment • Niigata highways • National Road 17-go parallels Kanetsu Highway • 17-go is bumper-to-bumper traffic on 2 lanes • Kanetsu Highway is empty – Tolls unreasonable under FILP “self-finance” concept, rendering roads useless • Regional airports • No useage, might never be even without steep landing fees. Pure pork barrel / poor planning. Not all bad • Carl Shoup instituted tax reform under the Occupation. While partial, historically Japan had: • No double taxation of dividends • No capital gains taxes on securities • Simple structure to income taxes that lessened the resources devoted to tax dodges • Large basic exemptions that limited the regressiveness of taxes Sustainability • Current deficit levels are not sustainable • 140% of GDP gross government debt (central & local) • Government is vulnerable to higher interest rates • Demographic transition implies huge future obligations • Just-published (Oct 12?, 2000) national balance sheet shows up to ¥700 trillion (US$7 trillion) in excess liabilities [with no correction for dubious assets] • That’s more than 100% of GDP…not an amount that can be borrowed The End • Resources: – Government web sites in English provide an overview of the budget and FILP – Hiromitsu Ishi, The Japanese Tax System. 2nd edition, Clarendon Press (Oxford), 1993. – Various JEI reports - see their web site and (partial) search capabilities, plus the printed indexes for older years in Leyburn.