Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Success Stories and its Limits: The Concrete Case Studies (3 lectures) • - Russia/Soviet Union • - Latin America in the Era of Catching Up Industrialisation • - East Asian Miracle: The Rise of the New Industrial Pole The empire model of modernisation • Goals • Means • – maintenance of military-political power, ability to defensive and offensive war • – modernisation of army & the state governance, selective borrowings of the advanced technologies and scientific accomplishments important for militarisation The Rise of Dualism in Russia Army & military industry resources Exploitation of country-side Conservation of backwardness as the main obstacle to further modernisation Alexander Pushkin on the internal central-peripheral structure of Russia • • • • • • • • • • “Whatever for caprice of spending ingenious London has been sending across the Baltic in exchange for wood and tallow; all the range of useful objects that the curious Parisian taste invents for one – for friends of languor, or of fun, or for the modishly luxurious – all this, at eighteen years of age adorned the sanctum of our sage.” (Eugene Onegin) GDP per capita in some countries of Latin America and Europe (including Russia), 1870-1938 Countries Absolute amount of GDP per capita, measured by PPP (in dollars of 1990) The ratio of countries’ GDP per capita to the world average 1870 1900 1913 1929 1938 1870 1900 1913 1929 1938 France 1 858 2 849 3 452 4 666 4 424 2.02 2.18 2.17 2.47 2.30 Germany 1 913 3 134 3 833 4 335 5 126 2.08 2.40 2.41 2.30 2.67 United Kingdom 3 263 4 593 5 032 5 255 5 983 3.55 3.52 3.16 2.79 3.11 Russia/USSR 1 023 1 218 1 488 1 386 2 150 1.11 0.93 0.93 0.74 1.12 Argentina 1 311 2 756 3 797 4 367 4 072 1.43 2.11 2.39 2.32 2.12 Brazil 740 704 839 1 106 1 291 0.80 0.54 0.53 0.59 0.67 Chile - 1 949 2 653 3 396 3 139 - 1.49 1.67 1.80 1.63 710 1 157 1 467 1 489 1 380 0.77 0.89 0.92 0.79 0.72 - 821 1 104 3 426 4 144 - 0.63 0.69 1.82 2.15 920 1 305 1 592 1 884 1 923 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Mexico Venezuela World in average *) For comparison of Uruguay with Denmark • Dieter Sengaas. The European Experience: A Historical Critique of Development Theory. Leamington Spa, Dover (N.H.): Berg Publishers, 1985 (1-st published in Frankfurt-amMain, 1982, in German) The ratio of some Latin American and European countries’ (including Russia/USSR) GDP per capita to the world average, 1929-1970 Countries 1929 1938 1950 1960 1970 France 2. 47 2. 30 2. 33 2. 55 2. 92 Germany/FRG 2. 30 2. 67 1. 91 2. 89 3. 03 United Kingdom 2. 79 3. 11 3. 14 2. 92 2. 70 Russia/USSR 0. 74 1. 12 1. 27 1. 34 1. 40 Argentina 2. 32 2. 12 2. 23 1. 90 1. 84 Brazil 0. 59 0. 67 0. 75 0. 80 0. 77 Chile 1. 80 1. 63 1. 71 1. 47 1. 32 Mexico 0. 79 0. 72 0. 93 0. 95 0. 95 Venezuela 1. 82 2. 15 3. 32 3. 32 2. 73 World in average *) 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Limits of Import Substitution Industrialisation to itself (Latin America) • 1) A shortage of material, financial, and human resources; • 2) Conservation of the internal centralperipheral structure; • 3) Necessity to enlarge importation of capital goods and to maintain the traditional export; • 4) Impossibility to redistribute national income in extending degree