Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The sustainability of public finances in Slovenia: medium- and long-term challenges Per Eckefeldt European Commission Ljubljana, 8 July 2014 The views expressed herein are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. Short-term risk for indicator and fiscal crisis (S0 market perceptions) Slovenia 2009 2013 Financial market information Sovereign Ratings as of May14, SI Moody's S&P Fitch Local currency long term short term Ba1 AA-2 BBB+ Foreign currency long term short term Ba1 AA-2 BBB+ Financial market information as of May 2014, SI Sovereign yield spreads(bp)* CDS (bp) 2-year n.a. 10-year 5-year n.a. 149 2 Short-term risk for fiscal crisis (S0 indicator) • Risks markedly reduced since 2009 in the EA countries and SI High risk Low risk 3 Gov’t debt prospects SI and EA (1) Stochastic debt projections 2014-18, SI (% of GDP) Stochastic debt projections: 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 2011 2012 2013 2014 p10_p20 2015 2016 2017 p20_p40 p40_p60 p60_p80 p80_p90 p50 gdebt_gdp_DSM 2018 Debt maturity structure (as % of GDP), baseline scenario - SI 90 80 70 60 50 Rather stable baseline debt developments in SI while on a downward path in the EA, but with some uncertainty 40 30 20 10 00 2014 2015 2016 New long-term debt Rolled-over short-term debt 2017 2018 2019 2020 New short-term debt Outstanding (non maturing) debt 2021 2022 2023 Rolled-over long-term debt 2024 4 Gov’t debt prospects SI and EA (2) (2) Snow ball effect 1.2 3.3 2.7 1.8 0.8 Interest expenditure 1.9 2.2 2.6 3.0 2.9 Growth effect -0.3 1.2 0.6 -0.5 -1.1 Inflation effect -0.4 -0.1 -0.5 -0.7 -1.0 (3) Stock flow adjustm ent and one-off m easures 3.7 2.2 13.0 6.3 0.0 Per memo Structural def icit 5.0 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.4 Notes: f or primary balance, structural primary balance and structural def icit, a positive sign indicates a def icit in the table above. -0.1 2.3 -1.0 -1.4 0.0 -0.5 2.1 -1.1 -1.6 0.0 -0.4 2.0 -0.8 -1.6 0.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.0 Deterministic debt projections: Gross public debt as % of GDP - SI 110 0.3 2.5 -0.9 -1.2 0.0 110 100 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 Gross public Risks much 50 higher in both 40 SI2011 and the EA in 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 the event of a return to the Gross public 110 historically 100 observed lower 90 structural fiscal 80 positions, and 70 even more so in 60 combination 50 with historical 40 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 interest (and 5 growth) rates 60 50 40 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Baseline no-policy change scenario No-policy change scenario without ageing costs Historical SPB scenario Combined historical scenario Baseline no-pol Stability and Gro Stability and Co Gross public debt as % of GDP - SI 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Baselin e n o-policy chan ge scena rio Standa rdized (permane nt) neg ative shock (-1p .p.) to the sho rt- and lon g-term intere st r ate s on newly issued and rolle d o ver de bt Standa rdized (permane nt) positive shock (+ 1p.p.) to the short- and long -ter m interest rates o n n ewly issu ed a nd rolled over debt Baselin e n o-policy chan Standa rdized (permane Standa rdized (permane Standa rdized (permane Standa rdized (permane Gov’t debt prospects SI and EA (3) Deterministic debt projections: Risks relating to the fiscal starting point: necessary to sustain a primary surplus so as to keep gov’t debt levels in check in SI (in contrast with past experience) 6 Gov’t debt prospects SI and EA 60 60 50 50 40 (4) 40 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Baseline no-policy change scenario No-policy change scenario without ageing costs Historical SPB scenario Combined historical scenario Gross public debt as % of GDP - SI 110 Baseline no-policy change scenario Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) institutional scenario Stability and Convergence Programme (SCP) scenario 110 100 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 Gross public debt as % of GDP - SI 40 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Baseline no-policy change scenario Standardized (permanent) negative shock (-0.5p.p.) on GDP growth Standardized (permanent) positive shock (+0.5p.p.) on GDP growth Standardized (permanent) negative shock (-0.5p.p.) on inflation Standardized (permanent) positive shock (+0.5p.p.) on inflation Baseline no-policy change scenario Standardized (permanent) negative shock (-1p.p.) to the short- and long-term interest rates on newly issued and rolled over debt Standardized (permanent) positive shock (+1p.p.) to the short- and long-term interest rates on newly issued and rolled over debt Gross public debt as % of GDP - SI 110 110 100 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 Gross public debt as % of GDP - SI Sensitivity analysis: introducing shocks to the key assumptions underpinning the baseline debt projections 40 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Baseline no-policy change scenario Standardized (permanent) negative shock (-1p.p.) to the short- and long-term interest rates on newly issued and rolled over debt Enhanced (permanent) positive shock (+2p.p./+1p.p) to the short- and long-term interest rates on newly issued and rolled over debt 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Baseline no-policy change scenario Enhanced (permanent) negative shock (-stdev(11-13)/-0.5p.p.) on GDP growth Enhanced (permanent) positive shock (+stdev(11-13)/+0.5p.p.) on GDP growth Standardized (permanent) negative shock (-0.5p.p.) on inflation Standardized (permanent) positive shock (+0.5p.p.) on inflation 7 Gov’t debt prospects SI and EA 0.8 2.9 1.1 1.0 0.0 2.4 above. 0.3 2.5 -0.9 -1.2 0.0 -0.1 2.3 -1.0 -1.4 0.0 -0.5 2.1 -1.1 -1.6 0.0 -0.4 2.0 -0.8 -1.6 0.0 -0.6 1.9 -0.9 -1.6 0.0 -0.9 1.6 -1.0 -1.5 0.0 -0.9 1.7 -1.1 -1.5 0.0 -0.9 1.8 -1.2 -1.5 0.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.8 2.1 (5) -0.5 2.1 -1.2 -1.5 0.0 2.6 Deterministic debt projections: Gross public debt as % of GDP - SI 110 100 90 80 policy scenarios 70 60 50 40 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2022 2023 2024 Baseline no-policy change scenario Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) institutional scenario Stability and Convergence Programme (SCP) scenario Gross public debt as % of GDP - SI 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Baselin e n o-policy chan ge scena rio Standa rdized (permane nt) neg ative shock (-0.5p.p.) o n G DP gro wth Standa rdized (permane nt) positive shock (+ 0.5p.p.) on GDP growth Standa rdized (permane nt) neg ative shock (-0.5p.p.) o n in fla tion Standa rdized (permane nt) positive shock (+ 0.5p.p.) on inflation Government debt very high in the SI and the EA, but: firstly, sticking to the EU fiscal rules (SGP); and, secondly, rigorously implementing the fiscal plans laid down in the 2014 SCPs would set it on a clear downward path (towards 60% of 8 GDP) Fiscal sustainability gaps in the medium/longterm significant challenges in SI (1) 9 Fiscal sustainability gaps in the medium/longterm significant challenges in SI (2) 12 Sustainability indicator (S2) 10 8 6 4 2 0 IT PT LV ES HU FR EA EE DE HR DK EU PL IE BG SE LT RO UK AT SK S2 S2 (SCP scenario) CZ NL FI MT SI BE -2 CoA - Others CoA - HC<C CoA - Pensions IBP S2 (COM 2013 scenario) -4 10 LU Thank you for your attention! 11 Background slides