Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Optionen für die Eurozone Dr. Daniel Stelter The two problems of the euro zone Too much debt Competitiveness Total debt (% of GDP) Unit labor costs, Q1 2000 = 100 500 150 450 419 140 400 348 350 300 250 309 254 259 251 130 241 210 120 200 150 100 229 182 191 213 199 241 183 110 188 50 100 0 0 2000 2011 2000 Note: debt data based on unconsolidated total liabilities (for corporates only loans) at market prices (exception: Belgium non-financial sector debt is consolidated) Source: Eurostat; bto analysis 2 2012 How to solve the euro crisis? Address debt overhang Restore competitiveness ? ? ? ? 1 Internal devaluation 2 Permanent transfers from north to south "Is U.S. economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six GrowRobert out ofGordon, the problem 3Source: headwinds", NBER Working Paper 18315, http://www.nber.org/papers/w18315 4 Organized debt restructuring and growth agenda 5 The inflation solution 6 Debt restructuring and Euro zone exits 3 Stereotyping in Europe Who is Trustworthy, Arrogant and Compassionate EU nation most likely to be named... Views in: Britain France Germany Italy Spain Greece Poland Czech Rep. Source: PEW Research Center 4 Most Trustworthy Least Trustworthy Most Arrogant Least Arrogant Most Compassionate Least Compassionate Joint restructuring the euro zone debt overhang Pooling excess debt €1.1T >90% €0.3T of GDP >60% €3.7T of GDP €7T €6T Non-fin. Corp. Private households €5.5T Government Roll-in of government debt > 60% of GDP per country Funding for private sector recapitalizations for debt > 90% of GDP per sector and country Source: Eurostat; bto analysis 5 Refinancing with Eurobonds €5.1T Eurozone redemption fund Accompanying measures • Structural and fiscal reforms • Limits on new indebtedness • Measures to reduce private debt LT < 60% of GDP Features • Jointly guaranteed to obtain AAA rating and low rates • Staggered maturities matching repayment profile • Repayment over 20 years Repayment options I. Each country repays own debt II. Reallocation for GIPS debt to Euro zone average (55% of GDP) III. Reallocation for all countries according to GDP IV. Euro zone wide wealth tax on household assets Option I: No reallocation Without reallocation, debt service costs Debt burden for Greece already reduced after haircut Total excess debt and costs to repay over 20 years per country (B€) 1,500 No reallocation 1,000 500 0 EZ Excess debt to GDP 57% 49% 27% 63% 72% 49% 67% 179% 108% 51% % GDP p.a.1 2.4% 2.2% 1.2% 2.8% 3.2% 2.4% 3.1% 7.0% 5.4% 2.3% % Fin. Ass. p.a.1 0.9% 1.1% 0.7% 1.3% 2.0% 2.0% 1.0% 3.6% 2.4% 1.1% 1. Costs p.a. based on 20 year repayment horizon, interest rate for pooled debt of 2.75%, forecasts for euro zone inflation 2.1%, and real growth 1.7% plus an additional 0.5% growth following structural reforms (different growth forecast assumed for each country) Note: Excess debt (above 60% for governments, and above 90% of GDP each for household and for non-fin. corporations) is assumed to be pooled and paid down by raising extra taxes. Debt refers to non-consolidated gross debt (exception: Greek government debt is consolidated and Belgium nonfinancial sector debt is consolidated). Data for LTM Q3 2011 (pro-forma after Greek haircut). Source: Eurostat; ECB; EIU forecasts; bto analysis 6 Option II: Reallocation to GDP for GIPS Reallocation of GIPS excess debt manageable Excess debt burden for GIPS reduced to 54% of GDP, for all other countries increased by 4–5 pp Total excess debt and costs to repay over 20 years per country (B€) 1,500 Reallocation of excess debt from GIPS to other countries 1,000 500 0 EZ Excess debt to GDP 63% 56% 34% 69% 51% 49% 74% 51% 51% 51% % GDP p.a.1 2.6% 2.5% 1.5% 3.1% 2.3% 2.4% 3.4% 2.0% 2.6% 2.3% % Fin. Ass. p.a.1 1.0% 1.2% 0.8% 1.4% 1.4% 2.0% 1.1% 1.0% 1.1% 1.1% 1. Costs p.a. based on 20 year repayment horizon, interest rate for pooled debt of 2.75%, forecasts for euro zone inflation 2.1%, and real growth 1.7% plus an additional 0.5% growth following structural reforms (different growth forecast assumed for each country) Note: Excess debt (above 60% for governments, and above 90% of GDP each for household and for non-fin. corporations) is assumed to be pooled and paid down by raising extra taxes. Debt refers to non-consolidated gross debt (exception: Greek government debt is consolidated and Belgium nonfinancial sector debt is consolidated). Data for LTM Q3 2011 (pro-forma after Greek haircut). Source: Eurostat; ECB; EIU forecasts; bto analysis 7 High inflation differential required to realign competitiveness 8 7 6 5.5 5 4 3 Euro zone avg. = 3.6 3.8 2.5 2 1.3 1 0 0.0 0.0 1.Based on Goldman Sachs calculation: The realignment is supposed to achieve external debt sustainability, so that the net foreign asset or debt position reduces to less than 25% of GDP 2. Average for 2010-12 Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream (Eurostat), CesIfo Working Paper No 4086, Goldman Sachs, European Economic Analyst No 3/2013; bto analysis 8 0.0 Deal with the debt problem Redemption fund Reform labor markets Improve education Implement smart immigration policy Only together can we make it happen! 9