Download Chapter 1

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Chapter 12
Money,
Banking,
Prices, and
Monetary
Policy
Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
The Inflation Rate (1) and The Fisher Relation (2)
(1)
P' P
i
P
(2)
1 R
1 r 
1 i
(2 approx)
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
r  R i
1-2
Nominal Money Demand
• Substitute using the approximate Fisher relation.
M d  PL(Y , r  i)
• For some of our experiments, suppose inflation rate is
zero (harmless, it’s short run).
M d  PL(Y , r )
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-3
Figure 12.5
The Nominal Money Demand Curve in the
Monetary Intertemporal Model
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-4
Figure 12.6
The Effect of an Increase in Current Real Income on
the Nominal Money Demand Curve
per dato P
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
an increase in r does
the opposite (more
convenient investing
in bonds)
1-5
Figure 12.7
The Current Money Market in the Monetary
Intertemporal Model (with inflation)
• ↑ Ms => P ↑ (old story)
• ↑ Md (e.g. ↑ liquidity
preference) => r ↑ => I ↓
=> Y ↓ => P ↓
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-6
Labor Demand and Labor Supply
Real
wage =
w = W/P
Nd=labor demand (employers)
Ns=labor supply(employees,
workers): if r (from today
onwards) ↑ => better to work
harder today and save for
tomorrow
(intertemporal model)
Ns also positively depends
upon W (nominal)
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-7
Figure 12.9
A Level Increase in the Money Supply in the
Current Period
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-8
Figure 12.10
The Effects of a Level Increase in M
The Neutrality of Money (hp perfect information)
In a monetary intertemporal
model, a level increase in the
money supply increases the
price level and the nominal
wage in proportion to the
money supply increase, but has
no effect on any real
macroeconomic variable.
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-9
The Short-Run Nonneutrality of Money:
Friedman-Lucas Money Surprise Model
(hp imperfect information)
• Different aggregate shocks hit the economy – money
supply shocks and productivity shocks – and
consumers cannot observe these shocks directly.
• Imperfect information: consumers know the market
nominal wage, but they do not observe all prices
simultaneously, so they do not know their real wage.
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-10
Figure 12.14
The Effects of an Unanticipated Increase in the
Money Supply in the Money Surprise Model
• Money supply increases:
workers see an increase in
their nominal wage, and
think that their real wage
has increased.
• Workers supply more
labor, labor becomes
cheaper and output
increases.
• Nonneutrality of money,
but only because people are
fooled into working harder.
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-11
Shifts in Money Demand: now the CB is
uninformed!
• These shifts are important for how monetary policy
should be conducted.
• Shifts in the demand for money that occur within a day,
week or month (the very short run) are a critical for the
central bank.
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-12
A Shift in the Demand for Money
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-13
Instability in Money Demand
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-14
Shocks that the central bank is concerned with
• money demand, output demand, output supply
• Key problem for the central bank: it cannot observe
the shocks directly, and does not have timely
information on all economic variables.
• Two alternative policy rules which central banks have
adopted: money supply targeting, interest rate
targeting.
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-15
Figure 12.15:
A Surprise Increase in Money Demand When
There Is MONETARY TARGETING by the Central
Bank (constant M, or CONSTANT GROWTH RATE of M)
2) P↓, W (nom.)↓
workers reduce
labor supply
N↓, w (real)↑
Interest rate targeting
would be less (output)
destabilizing
3) less labor (more
expensive) => Y supply ↓
+ money dem. ↑ => r ↑
Typo in the book:
switch Y1 and Y2
1) Money
demand
increases (e.g.
preference for
liquidity): P↓
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-16
Figure 12.16
A Total Factor Productivity Increase When There Is
INTEREST RATE TARGETING by the Central
Bank
1) TFP↑ => employers ↑ labor demand
N ↑, w (real)↑
4) P↓ => W↓=> employees ↓ labor supply
Notice: W↓= w ↑*P↓↓
2) pressure for Y supply↑ and
decrease in prices => pressure for r↓
3) In order to prevent r↓ the CB must
↓Ms => P↓
This destabilizes prices!
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-17
Optimal Central Banking
• What tends to work well in practice is for the central
bank to target a short-term nominal interest rate in the
very short run, and to consider changing this target
every few weeks.
• There is much volatility in money demand in the very
short run – interest rate targeting accommodates this.
• Productivity shocks are slower moving – the interest rate
target can change in response.
• Mostly used: Taylor rule
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-18
The Zero Lower Bound and Quantitative Easing
• Zero lower bound: The nominal interest rate cannot go
below zero
• What happens when r = 0 ? At the zero lower bound
there is a liquidity trap. Increasing the money supply
through conventional means does not do anything –
even prices do not change.
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-19
Figure 12.18
A Typical Yield Curve
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-20
Quantitative Easing
• Under conventional accommodative monetary policy, the
central bank swaps money for short-term government
securities, drives down short-term interest rates and
stimulates short-run investment.
• But in a liquidity trap, this does not work.
• However, long-term nominal interest rates can be positive
when short-term rates are zero.
• What if the central bank purchases long-term government
securities? Long-term interest rates should go down =>
long term investment should increase and Y can also
increase
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-21
Related documents