Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chapter 12 Money, Banking, Prices, and Monetary Policy Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. The Inflation Rate (1) and The Fisher Relation (2) (1) P' P i P (2) 1 R 1 r 1 i (2 approx) © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. r R i 1-2 Nominal Money Demand • Substitute using the approximate Fisher relation. M d PL(Y , r i) • For some of our experiments, suppose inflation rate is zero (harmless, it’s short run). M d PL(Y , r ) © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-3 Figure 12.5 The Nominal Money Demand Curve in the Monetary Intertemporal Model © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-4 Figure 12.6 The Effect of an Increase in Current Real Income on the Nominal Money Demand Curve per dato P © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. an increase in r does the opposite (more convenient investing in bonds) 1-5 Figure 12.7 The Current Money Market in the Monetary Intertemporal Model (with inflation) • ↑ Ms => P ↑ (old story) • ↑ Md (e.g. ↑ liquidity preference) => r ↑ => I ↓ => Y ↓ => P ↓ © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-6 Labor Demand and Labor Supply Real wage = w = W/P Nd=labor demand (employers) Ns=labor supply(employees, workers): if r (from today onwards) ↑ => better to work harder today and save for tomorrow (intertemporal model) Ns also positively depends upon W (nominal) © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-7 Figure 12.9 A Level Increase in the Money Supply in the Current Period © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-8 Figure 12.10 The Effects of a Level Increase in M The Neutrality of Money (hp perfect information) In a monetary intertemporal model, a level increase in the money supply increases the price level and the nominal wage in proportion to the money supply increase, but has no effect on any real macroeconomic variable. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-9 The Short-Run Nonneutrality of Money: Friedman-Lucas Money Surprise Model (hp imperfect information) • Different aggregate shocks hit the economy – money supply shocks and productivity shocks – and consumers cannot observe these shocks directly. • Imperfect information: consumers know the market nominal wage, but they do not observe all prices simultaneously, so they do not know their real wage. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-10 Figure 12.14 The Effects of an Unanticipated Increase in the Money Supply in the Money Surprise Model • Money supply increases: workers see an increase in their nominal wage, and think that their real wage has increased. • Workers supply more labor, labor becomes cheaper and output increases. • Nonneutrality of money, but only because people are fooled into working harder. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-11 Shifts in Money Demand: now the CB is uninformed! • These shifts are important for how monetary policy should be conducted. • Shifts in the demand for money that occur within a day, week or month (the very short run) are a critical for the central bank. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-12 A Shift in the Demand for Money © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-13 Instability in Money Demand © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-14 Shocks that the central bank is concerned with • money demand, output demand, output supply • Key problem for the central bank: it cannot observe the shocks directly, and does not have timely information on all economic variables. • Two alternative policy rules which central banks have adopted: money supply targeting, interest rate targeting. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-15 Figure 12.15: A Surprise Increase in Money Demand When There Is MONETARY TARGETING by the Central Bank (constant M, or CONSTANT GROWTH RATE of M) 2) P↓, W (nom.)↓ workers reduce labor supply N↓, w (real)↑ Interest rate targeting would be less (output) destabilizing 3) less labor (more expensive) => Y supply ↓ + money dem. ↑ => r ↑ Typo in the book: switch Y1 and Y2 1) Money demand increases (e.g. preference for liquidity): P↓ © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-16 Figure 12.16 A Total Factor Productivity Increase When There Is INTEREST RATE TARGETING by the Central Bank 1) TFP↑ => employers ↑ labor demand N ↑, w (real)↑ 4) P↓ => W↓=> employees ↓ labor supply Notice: W↓= w ↑*P↓↓ 2) pressure for Y supply↑ and decrease in prices => pressure for r↓ 3) In order to prevent r↓ the CB must ↓Ms => P↓ This destabilizes prices! © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-17 Optimal Central Banking • What tends to work well in practice is for the central bank to target a short-term nominal interest rate in the very short run, and to consider changing this target every few weeks. • There is much volatility in money demand in the very short run – interest rate targeting accommodates this. • Productivity shocks are slower moving – the interest rate target can change in response. • Mostly used: Taylor rule © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-18 The Zero Lower Bound and Quantitative Easing • Zero lower bound: The nominal interest rate cannot go below zero • What happens when r = 0 ? At the zero lower bound there is a liquidity trap. Increasing the money supply through conventional means does not do anything – even prices do not change. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-19 Figure 12.18 A Typical Yield Curve © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-20 Quantitative Easing • Under conventional accommodative monetary policy, the central bank swaps money for short-term government securities, drives down short-term interest rates and stimulates short-run investment. • But in a liquidity trap, this does not work. • However, long-term nominal interest rates can be positive when short-term rates are zero. • What if the central bank purchases long-term government securities? Long-term interest rates should go down => long term investment should increase and Y can also increase © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-21