Download Presentation - The 21st Century Indian City

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
The ‘political economy’ of India’s
Urban Environment: a few thoughts
Aromar Revi
New Delhi 25th March 2011
The 21st century Indian city:
Developing an agenda for Urbanisation
www.iihs.co.in
iihs
Mumbai: minimum city…
Slums in
the City
Mumbai:
a cross-section of Slums
Bharat Nagar and other slums, Raoli Junction
Ekvira Nagar, Salt pan land
Near Airport
Ganesh Murty Nagar
Mumbai’s Slum Services: Water Supply
Bharat Nagar
Dharavi
Shanti Nagar
Chikhalwadi
Ambedkar Nagar
Mumbai’s Slum Services: Solid Waste
Garbage dumping place, Andhra Association
Garbage Bin, Near Khotwadi
Unhygienic surroundings, Anna Nagar
Clean Street, Dadabhai Chawl
Mumbai’s formal & informal Land Price differentials
Average developed land and property value by ward, 2005
120000
Colaba
Average developed land value
(FSI-1) Rs. per.sq.m
Value (Rs.per.sqm)
100000
Average property value Rs.
per.sq.m
80000
Land value of studied slums
Rs. per.sq.m
Bandra
Peddar Road
60000
Ghatkopar
40000
Mulund
20000
T
R
PN
M
KW
H
W
S
G
FS
E
C
A
0
Ward Name
Mumbai’s (imputed) land market value estimated in 2005 at ~ Rs. 560,000
crores. Distortions in this market primary factor in the huge (55%+) city slum
population
Outcome Mumbai: the slum
capital of the world
• 7 million+ people living in ‘slums’
• Dysfunctional land & housing markets
• Declining quality of public services &
security
• Tardy transformation of landuse &
economic functions
• Declining quality of governance
• Ecological footprints expanding across
the subcontinent
• Steady decline in resource-use
efficiency
• Increasing polarisation of wealth
this is clearly unsustainable …
Open Defecation: 0.5 million people per day in Mumbai
RECOMMENDED CONCEPT OPTION: MMR 2031
“City Of Islands”
Comparative long-range Urbanisation trends
(1950-2050)
Urbanisation trends: India, China & the USA (1950-2050)
Urbanisation rate (% of total population)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1950
World
1960
1970
China
1980
India
1990
Years
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
USA
UN World Urbanisation Prospects, 2007
India: an dramatic opportunity for balanced RUrban development
Global Health Risk forecast by risk factor (2005-2060)
Source: Hughes et. al., 2011, Improving Global Health, Forecasting for the next 50 Years
The Dynamics of Indian Urbanisation
(1951-2031)
1951
Tibet
W. Pakistan
Nepal
E.
India
Population Size (millions)
< 0.1
0.1 – 0.5
0.5 - 1
1-5
>5
Source: Census of India, 1971- 2001
UN, 2007
IIHS analysis, 2009-10
Pakistan
Population (in millions)
2011
Delhi
(16.9)
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1951
1961
1971
1981
1991
2001
2011
2021
2031
Urban Population Growth
Ahmadabad
(5.7)
Kolkata
(15.5)
Mumbai
(20)
1-5
>5
Source: Census of India, 1971- 2001
UN, 2007
IIHS analysis, 2009-10
Pune
(5.0)
Bangalore
(7.2)
Chennai
(7.5)
Urban Settlements
Population Size
(millions)
< 0.1
0.1 – 0.5
0.5 - 1
Hyderabad
(6.7)
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011 2021 2031
Large Urban Settlement Growth
Population (in millions)
2031
Delhi
(24.4)
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1951
1961
1971
1981
1991
2001
2011
2021
2031
Urban Population Growth
Kanpur
(5.1)
Ahmadabad
(8.5)
Kolkata
(22.3)
Surat
(6.3)
Mumbai
(28.6)
1-5
>5
Source: Census of India, 1971-2001
UN, 2007
IIHS analysis, 2009-10
Pune
(7.4)
Bangalore
(10.6)
Chennai
(11.1)
Urban Settlements
Population Size
(millions)
< 0.1
0.1 – 0.5
0.5 - 1
Hyderabad
(9.9)
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011 2021 2031
Large Urban Settlement Growth
The Growth of India’s Urban Economy
(1991-2031)
Growth of India's Urban Economy (1991-2031)
Rs. Trillion / lakh crores
300
250
200
150
100
Rs. 1450 lakh crores
50
Rs 735 lakh crores
1991
2001
2011
Time (years)
GDP (current prices)
Urban GDP
2021
2031
Indian Cities & the global
21st century Sustainability transition
The Challenge of the 21st century Sustainability Transition
Present consumption requires ~2.0 worlds
21st century Population growth needs 1.5+ worlds
Available
only One
World
Ending poverty at present throughput ~2.0 worlds
This transition will be played out in Indian & Chinese cities
20th century pre-emption of ‘ecological space’ (1900-2004)
∆ Order of
Magnitude +
Cumulative Carbon emissions over the 20th century potentially pre-empts
ecological & hence human development ‘space’ in the global South
Can Services-sector led growth enable a Sustainability Transition?
Services-sector growth led to very different outcomes in the US, Japan & Germany.
China has chosen a conventional manufacturing-export led strategy unlike India
Ecological Footprint vs. HDI (1975)
‘Sustainable
Development
’
The ‘holy grail’ of national Sustainable Development a HDI of ~ 0.9
& Ecological Footprint of 1 global Ha/per capita
The Sustainability transition will be fought & won in cities
Early 21st century ‘tunnelling through’ will be fought and won in Asian and ‘emerging
economy’ urban areas and around new metabolisms, economies and sufficiencies
Future History - Sustainability Transitions: 2005 
‘Sustainable
Development’
Can China traverse the environmental Kuznets curve; Germany & USA converge
without serious Human Development decline India ‘tunnel through’;
or will there be serious international ‘resource’ conflict?
A new form of urbanisation?
India’s Settlement structure matched to deliver
Climate adaptation & mitigation co-benefits
Revi, 2010
~ 7,800 urban areas and ~ 0.55 million rural settlements in 20011 – the opportunity
for decentralised production and consumption systems and economic structure
Catalysing five national outcomes by the 2030s
‘Inclusive’ Economic Growth
Reduced Poverty and Inequality
Social Transformation
Environmental Sustainability
Unified & Robust Polity
Who really ‘manages’ Urban India?
Top Management
• MPs & MLAs
• Higher Judiciary
• IAS & IPS
• CXOs (top 500 corporates)
• NGO leadership
Total
% educated & trained in urban practice
Middle Management
• Senior Municipal officials
• Senior Engineers
• Urban Planners
Total
% educated & trained in urban practice
5,300
650
8,200
~ 5,000
~ 1,750
20,900
< 5%
~ 4,000
~ 8,000
~ 2,000
~ 14,000
< 20%
Related documents