Download ppt

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Public, Private and Social
Housing in Post-crisis
East Asia
Richard Ronald
[email protected]
Urban Studies
University of Amsterdam
Different Housing Pathways
• European social housing problematised,
stigmatized and residualised since 1980s
• Transformation of housing associations
into self financing, market facing social
enterprises
• Public housing provision (of a more
social nature) revitalized in East Asia
since 1998 (especially after 2008)
• But why is policy socializing and how
manifesting differently in each country?
The Origins of Housing Policy
• Colonial legacies, the presence of China
and the desire to ‘catch up’
• Policy goals under ‘Developmental’ States
– shaped public housing policy: house workers,
extend urban infrastructure, realise potential
land values, sustain employment & rapid growth
• Housing policy in ‘Productivist’ regimes
– welfare state expansion either sacrificed or
focused on economic objectives (Holliday 2000;
Kwon, 2005)
• Deep Interventions: Public housing rather
than Social housing:
– commodified (Private) rather than decommodifying (Doling 1999, Groves et al 2007)
Examples: Singapore & Hong Kong
• Singapore (HDB)
–
–
–
–
Owner-occupied 29% to 92% (1970-2002)
Public sector 83%+ of all housing
CPF circuits of capital
Regulated second hand market
• Hong Kong (HKHA)
– Public rental build & slum clearance 1970s
– Keeping wages low and welfare state small
through public housing (Castells et al,1990)
– Shift to HOS policies in 1980s and 90s
– In 2009 29% Public rental, 16% public HOS
• Public Housing policy as main Pillar of
Welfare, Urban & Economic Policy
• Comparable approaches: Japan (1950s &
60s) Taiwan (70s-90s), China (90s-2000s)
Asian Financial Crisis!
• Watershed moment in East
Asian socioeconomic pathway
• End of rapid growth, high/full
employment era
• Undermined asset and real
estate values
• Tested security and adequacy
of welfare measures
The New Policy
Landscape
• New role of developmental state in
slower growth era (Kharas & Gill 2009)
• Ongoing processes of neoliberalization
• Socioeconomic polarization (kakusa
shakai)
• Democratization and intensified political
contestation
• Era of in-affordability & house price
volatility
• The state as competent housing provider
2008 and the ‘Global’ Crisis!
House price fluctuations
15 %
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
2005
2006
2007
China
Singapore
2008
Hong Kong
South Korea
2009
2010
Japan
Taiwan
2011
Taiwan – new social housing
• Long term promotion of home
ownership (67% to 82%,1976-2000)
• Less than 0.8% public rental housing
• Two major periods of house price
inflation in 1987-1990 and 2005+
12
• Snails without Shells - The Social
Housing Promotion Alliance
10
8
6
4
• Late-2010 New luxury tax on quick
sales of 2nd homes (Chen 2011)
2
0
-2
GDP growth rate (%)
Percent of unemployed to labor force (%)
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
-4
• 5 new social rental housing projects
South Korea’s Hybrid
social housing sector
•
Supply focus: 10.7 million housing units
constructed 1989-2007
•
1970s short term lets; Permanent public
housing program (1989) Fixed-tenure rental
(5-, 10-, 30- & 50-year) 1990 and 2000s
•
1998-2008 (Kim & Roh) Market reforms and
one million new social housing program shortage over but rising housing market inequalities
•
2008 Bogeumjari program: 1.5 million units 53% rental 47% subsidized purchase
•
Public rental housing <7.5% of housing 2000;
9.7% 2008, expected 12%+ by 2018
Housing policy plan (supply) 2009-2018
Category
Supplied Units
(expected)
Homeownership
700,000
Public Rental
Housing
Income
Residency Period
Permanent
200,000
10-year
Description
Mid to small-sized affordable housing
- Transfer (via sale) to homeownership after 10-year rental
- Home-share step-repayment
Deciles 3 to 5
Rental Housing Chonsei scheme
Total
100,000
10-20 year
National Rental
Housing
400,000
Deciles 2 to 4
30-year
Permanent Rental
Housing
100,000
Decile 1
No limit
1,500,000
- No monthly rental fees
- Inner-city neighborhoods
- Affordability: 60 to 70% of market price
- Sliding scale on household income
- Optional payment: Chonsei or monthly rental fees
- 3% of market rent
- Funding source from government direct subsidy
Social and Affordable
Housing in China
•
Post-1980 economic reform led by housing market
reform (urban H.O. grows 18%-82% 1980-2004)
•
Work Unit Housing abolished (1998) for
commercial housing; affordable housing;
government assisted rental
•
Uneven public measures & house price inflation =
housing market polarisation & economic instability
•
The ‘comfortable society’ making access to quality
dwelling a universal ‘basic housing right’
•
New housing policy implementation framework;
spending 1% GDP on affordable housing by 2020
New Directions
The end of an era and the beginning of the next
• Changes in Singapore, Hong Kong and Japan?
• Demographic and family change; New political,
democratic and socioeconomic context
• Capacity and demand to expand public provision
• Building new social housing models or adapting
the market to serve emerging developmentalism
• Lessons for Europe? tapping housing wealth;
failed Asset based welfare (Doling and Ronald
2010, 2011, Ronald and Doling 2010, 2012)