* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download PPT - Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Dynamic range compression wikipedia , lookup
Telecommunications engineering wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Negative feedback wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Nominal impedance wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
Audio power wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Zobel network wikipedia , lookup
Two-port network wikipedia , lookup
Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup
Transmission line loudspeaker wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Major Blocks and Peak Detector Sections of Channel Equalization Techniques for Ethernet Communication Systems Lizhuo Wang Dr. Jose Silva-Martinez Undergraduate Student Texas A&M University Undergraduate Summer Research Grant Program Department of Electrical Engineering Texas A&M University Assistant Professor Texas A&M University ABSTRACT Peak Detector Buffer and Error Amplifier Fast communication signals sent from one computer to another across the lines of transmission are degraded because of the reflection at the receiver. It is shown that equalizing the impedance at both ends will further improve the data transmission. The peak detector circuit is show below. The acquired peak values from the pervious stage will be compared by subtracting each other in a differential amplifier circuit. It will connect to the peak detector stage where a DC voltage is held. So a buffer is needed. The signal input is provided at the left side, while output includes the peak value of the AC amplitude and the DC component brought by the transistor. a symmetrical structure with low pass filters is implemented to eliminate the DC effect. A control loop using an active impedance matching device based on a chip solution is a feasible solution, which could save hundreds of thousands of dollars over the lifetime of a single product line and millions of dollars in all. PMOS transistor for bringing the gate impedance The values in filters are not required to be reasonable for on-chip design because the reference part on the right will not be put onto chips the main idea is to compare the voltage difference between the two ends of the transmission line and minimize the value by adjusting the impedance at both ends based on the value of the difference as a feedback. the minus end of the ideal amplifier is connected to a DC supply voltage around the input level. The project targets on designing fundamental building blocks, and mainly focuses on the peak detector part. The early design of the peak detector with reference counterpart. DESIGN The differentiation building block The figure on the right shows that the output difference from the peak detector has the ability to track the input amplitude. Applications Both amplifier output and detector outputs are graphed below. Matched perfectly = this stage works properly! Comparison of the peak detector transfer characteristic as determined by Cadence simulations, measurements at 80M Hz The latest version of the peak detector building block is shown on the left. *Pictures from Mr. Richard Kamprath’s Master Thesis No need for the DC reference part in the end. Large Capacitor for small ripples. Transmission Line Model Peak detector building block The transmission line circuit block used in Cadence The schematic of the whole circuit It is clearly shown in the right side graph that the difference of the peak values between the two wave signals is presented, which means it is functional as peak detectors. CADENCE SIMULATION RESULTS: The signal degradation is minimized when both the emitter and receiver capacitances are around 1/3 of the capacitance of the transmission line capacitance in the T-model. Outputs of the peak detector stages To prove that the difference between detected values and the difference between real peak values have a direct relationship. Plotted with several sets of simulation results Magnitude: capacitance as parametric sweep Group delay with the parametric simulation Plot of real peak difference vs. detected difference with the input signal amplitude from 40mV to 300mV A direct relationship, which means the detection will surely make sense and can be used for later stages. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK The transmission line model, peak detector and error amplifier building blocks for on-chip matching component of the Ethernet communication system are scratched out. It will connect to a A/D converter and a control part to adjust the ends capacitances in the transmission line stage.