Download From Holmes' Law to Ohm's Law

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Ohm's law wikipedia, lookup

Telecommunication wikipedia, lookup

Last mile wikipedia, lookup

Transcript
Ω
From Holmes’ Law to Ohm’s Law
Jim Chen
University of Minnesota Law School
Law in the Age of Networks:
Implications of Network Science for Legal Analysis
University of Illinois Center for Advanced Study
March 10, 2006
Privacy and Communication as
Reciprocal Images
• Privacy law protects the ability to keep
information secret
• Free speech jurisprudence generally
favors broad dissemination of information
• Sometimes law punishes all forms of
communication. E.g., Hoffa v. United
States, 385 U.S. 293 (1966)
• By contrast, we privilege communications
between spouses, attorneys & clients, etc.
Law as the Conscious Structuring
of Information Transfer (Vel Non)
• Constitutional and common law doctrines involving
privacy have a dynamic impact on interpersonal relations
– Talking with coconspirators leads to criminal liability and loss of
4th amendment protection
– Talking with your spouse, physician, attorney, or cleric is favored
• Dinner table conversation is the essence of being human
• Cf. Federalist No. 10: The oxygen that feeds fire also
sustains respiration and life
– Don’t asphyxiate yourself in an effort to avoid getting burned
– Madison knew chemistry had progressed beyond phlogiston!
Strahilevitz on Privacy as a Product
of Social Networks
• Lior Jacob Strahilevitz, A Social Networks
Theory of Privacy, 72 U. Chi. L. Rev. 919
(2005)
• Network structure is crucial to
understanding the dynamics of privacy
(and derivatively of communication)
• Nodes, strong versus weak links,
interaction between structure and culture
Key Variables Affecting Social
Networks
• Salience of information
– Scandalous or valuable versus boring
• Connectedness of nodes
– Some are “supernodes”; others are recluses
• Conductivity of nodes
– What is the probability that a node will communicate new
information?
– Some social links are strong; others are weak
• Complexity of information
– Weak links transmit, except as to complex information
• Durability of information
• Veracity versus mendacity
– Cf. signal versus noise
Ohm’s Law as a Static
Representation of Holmes’s Law
• To the extent that the “marketplace of
ideas” operates within social networks, we
can describe the transmission,
suppression, and retention of information
in terms used to describe electricity
• This is a purely static model, with no
power to describe, let alone predict, the
evolution of these social networks
Ohm’s Law and Its Corollaries
V  I Z
Z  R X
X  XL  XC
2
XC
XL
1

2fC
 2fL
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
V = voltage (v)
I = current (a)
Z = impedance (Ω)
R = resistance
X = reactance
C = capacitance (f)
L = inductance (h)
f = frequency (Hz)
– f of DC = 0 Hz
– AC has positive f
Electricity as an Analogy for
Information Within Social Networks
• Current or amperage (I) represents the salience of
information
• Impedance (Z), especially pure resistance (R),
expresses the lack of conductivity between certain nodes
• Analogizing complexity to frequency (f) allows us to use
concepts of capacitive and inductive reactance (XC and
XL) in analyzing information transmission
– Simple information (like DC) is blocked by capacitors
– Complex information (like AC) is blocked by inductors in
proportion to its frequency
• Durable information can be stored, as electrical energy
can be stored within a capacitor
• Further work? Ways of quantifying information-bearing
signals versus noise shed light on truth v. falsehood
Thank You
[email protected]
612-625-4839