Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chloroplasts “compartment size”: organelle population signalling, and the uncovering of chloroplast “master switches”. Altering light perception during tomato fruit ripening significantly affects antioxidant accumulation LW+UV D LW FR HW R B A tomato mutant with enhanced antioxidants (hp2) - shows enhanced plastid development, and - is defective in a repressors of photomorphogenesis (LsDET1) hp2j WT A cell’s plastid complement is dramatically affected by loss of LsDET1 WT hp2j Loss of LsDET1 leads to at least a doubling in plastid complement Absolute plastid area, outer mesocarp hp2 30000 20000 10000 0 0 100000 Cell area 200000 Absolute plastid area, inner mesocarp 50000 Plastid area Relative plastid compartment WT hp2 40000 30000 30 25.52 25 20 15 10 8.35 5 0 WT 20000 Plastid compartment (%) Plastid area 40000 WT Com hp2j Com Genotype 10000 0 0 100000 200000 Cell area 300000 Fruit-specific silencing of LsDET1 also leads to increased cellular plastid compartment wild type 2A11p:DET1i Plastome/nuclear genome ratio 1200 1000 800 600 400 TFM7p:DET1i P119p:DET1i 200 0 T56 2A11 TFM7 P119 (Unpublished data by E. Enfissi) The increase can also be measured as plastome/genome(Plants ratio of Davuluri et al. 2005, Nature Biotech. 7: 890-895) 400 300 200 100 9000 18 8000 16 7000 14 5000 10 4000 8 3000 6 4 2000 0 20000 40000 0 T56 60000 TFM7 0 14 8000 12 7000 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 40000 80000 4000 6 3000 4 2000 2 1000 0 T56 TFM7 0 14000 700 14 12000 500 400 300 200 12 40000 80000 120000 160000 Cell area (μm2) 4000 4 0 0 6000 6 0 120000 8000 8 2 80000 10000 10 100 40000 Total plastid area per cell (μm2) Average plastid size (μm2) 16 Inner mesocarp 800 600 60000 5000 8 120000 40000 6000 10 0 0 20000 Total plastid area per cell (μm2) 900 Average plastid size (μm2) 9000 Number of plastids per cell 16 Outer mesocarp 1000 0 Number of plastids per cell 1000 0 0 TFM7 T56 (WT) 6000 12 2 100 Plastid “growth” matters 20 Total plastid area per cell (μm2) Average plastid size (μm2) Number of plastids per cell 500 Exocarp Importantly, increased plastid compartment can be achieved by combinations of increases in plastid size and number 2000 0 T56 TFM7 Genotype 0 40000 80000 120000 160000 Cell area (μm2) Tight control of the total cellular plastid complement has long been known in cereal leaves (Pyke and Leech 1987, Planta 170: 416-420) (Ellis and Leech 1985, Planta 165: 120-125) Since plastid growth results from the expression of nuclear genes, this implies “plastid compartment size” retrograde signalling Chloroplast biogenesis can be followed as part of a whole transcriptome analysis of leaf initiation in the light (distinguishing the shoot apex and the cotyledons) 3dD +3dL +1dL +4dL +2dL +5dL Indeed light upregulates specifically in the shoot apex components of the plastid division process, but this is unlikely to be the driving force in chloroplast accumulation. Many other processes occur. Plastid division ARC5 FtsZ 1.5 1.0 0.5 Cot 6 Cot 1 Cot 0 Mer 72 Mer 48 Mer 24 Mer 6 Mer 2 Mer 1 0.0 Mer 0 Relative expression 2.0 Combined examination of biochemically-unrelated chloroplast biogenesis genes reveals the existence of “modules” of corregulated genes. TIC 110