Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
North Carolina’s Shellfish Industry: Site Conditions and Economic Impacts A statewide survey of shellfish leaseholders James Morris Marc J. Turano, North Carolina Sea Grant Martin Posey, University of North Carolina Wilmington Troy Alphin, University of North Carolina Wilmington North Carolina UNC-SG-12-01 * www.ncseagrant.org De evelopingg Tools fo or the Gro owth of the N.C. SShellfish Industry: Site Condition C n Assessm ment and d Econom mic Impaccts Marc Turano na is a small, yeet traditionallyy important in ndustry to coasstal communitties, Shellfish aquaculture in North Carolin plemental inco me. Despite an n increase in seeafood deman nd, providing locally grown clams and oyssters and supp nder lease and d total numberr of leases has remained relaatively constan nt in recent yea ars. This project acreage un examined the scope of th he shellfish aqu uaculture indu ustry in North Carolina. Facttors surveyed iincluded the n by species an nd culture metthod, sales of sh hellfish by speecies and size, m market value o of cultured pro oduct, production seed sourcces, future prod duction and co onstraints to production. p Of the 228 surveyys sent to Nortth Carolina leaseholdeers, 22% were completed. Reespondents rep ported operatioons of leased a acreage rangin ng from 0.5 to 86 acres, 41% % of which werre located in Ca arteret Countyy. Shellfish cultture operation ns were in busiiness for 15 yeears on averagee, with 19% off respondents’ income generated from shelllfish culture a activities. Clam ms and oysters were the dominant species of culture, with the t majority prroducing bothh species. The ttop concerns of leaseholderss were ater quality. A mixed responsse was receiveed about the viiew of the indu ustry in the futture. theft, hurrricanes and wa Of the resp pondents, 42% % thought the industry would d grow in the nnext five years,, 38% thoughtt the industry w would decline, an nd 20% felt thee industry wou uld remain stab ble. Substantiaal potential exxists for curren nt leaseholderss to expand because most utiilize extensive methods for shellfish s produuction with rela atively low yieelds. Modest o existing lea ases would provide a significa ant increase inn shellfish prodduction. Largee-scale increasses in increases on North Caro olina’s shellfish industry willl likely requiree new operatioons that generrate primary in ncome. Assistance with siting g new shellfish leases could reduce r risks fro om theft and pproblematic water quality, a and therefore sshould be included when consid dering how to best b assist growth in the inddustry. Funding fo or this study was provided d to North Carolina Sea Gr ant by the NO OAA Sea Gran nt Aquaculturre Extension n and Technollogy Transfer 2010 program m through Grrant # NA10O OAR4170080Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǦǦǦ ǡ Ǥǡ ǤǤ ǡǡ Ǧ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ North Carolina C Sh hellfish Aquaculture ǡ ǡ ǦǤǤ ȋ ǡʹͲͲͻ ͻȌǤǤǤ ʹͲͲ ʹ ̈́ʹͶ͵ͳǡͳͲͲȋǡ ʹͲͲͻȌǡ Ǥ ǡ ǯ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡǯ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ ʹͲͲǡͺ ͺͷ ǡ ͳǤͳΨ ȋǡ ʹͲͲͻȌǤ ǤǤ ǡ ǡ ʹͲͲʹͲ ͲͳͲǡ ͷǡͲͲͲ ǡ ͻǡ ͲͲ Ǥ ǡ ͳͲ Ǥ ǤǤ ǡ ǡ ǡ ȋͳȌǤ ǡ Ǧ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ North Caro olina Shellfish Industry I 2000 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Acreage 1900 1800 1700 1600 1500 2005 2006 2007 Year Acreage 2008 Number of leases Figure 1. Recent history of shellfish leases in North Carolina. 2009 # leases Methods Ǧ ǯ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǤǤ Ǥ ʹͲͳͳǡ ʹʹͺ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ 1 North Carolina Sea Grant Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Figure 2. Shellfish lease size distribution in North Carolina. Frequency (%) Results ʹʹͺǡͶͻ ǡ ʹʹΨǤ Ǥ Ǥ O General Operations ǡ ǡ ǤǤ ͲǤͷͺǤͷ ȋ ʹȌǤ ǡͷͶΨǡ ͷ ǡ ʹΨ ͷ ͷͳͲ Ǥ ȋͶͳΨȌǡǡ ǡ ǡ ͳͺΨȋ͵ȌǤ ǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ͳͲͲȋ ͶȌǤǡʹ͵Ψ Ψ ͳʹͲǤ ͳͷǡ ͳͲǡͳͳ ͳͳͷǡ ʹͳΨǤ ǡ ǡ ͷΨȋ ͷȌǤ ǡǦ ǡ ͵ͺ ͶΨ ȋ ȌǤ ǡ Ǥ ʹΨǡ ͵ͳΨǡ ͶͳΨȋ ȌǤȋʹΨȌ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ North Caro olina Shellfish Industry I 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Lease Size (acres) Frequency (%) Figure 3. Breakdown of shellfish leases by county. 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Figure 4. Distribution of age of shellfish aquaculture operations in North Carolina. Frequency (%) 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Years in operation Frequency (%) Figure 5. Histogram of the percent of income generated from shellfish culture. 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Percent of Income 2 North Carolina Sea Grant ǡ ȋ ȌǡǤ ǡǡǤ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡǡ ǤǤ ǡ Ȅ ȋͳͲȌǤ ǡ Ǥ Figure 6. Origin of additional income obtained by NC shellfish leaseholders. Percent of income (%) 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Comm. Fish Shore Based Other duction Clam Prod ǣ ȋ ȌȌǡ Ǣǡ ǤǦ Ǣ Ǥ Ǧ ǡͳΨ Ǥ ǦȋȋͲΨȌǡ ʹ͵Ψ Ǥ ȋΨȌ ǦǦǦ Ǥ ǡͻ ͻͻΨ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǣ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ͺ ͻ ǤǤ ǡ ͳʹǤͷ ǡ ͻ ʹͲ Ǥ ȋͳ͵Ǥͺ Ȍǡ ͳ͵ ͳͲǤͺ Ǥ ͳ ͳǤ ǡ Ǥ ͳͻǤ Ȅͳ ͳͻǤǡͳͺ ǡ ͳ ǡǡ Ǥ Oyster Prroduction ǡ North Caro olina Shellfish Industry I Percent of leases (%) Figure 7. Species cultured on shellfish leases in North Carolina. 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Clams only Oysters only Clams and oysters Oysters , clams, and scallops Price per clam ($) Figure 8. Wholesale prices for cultured hard clams in North Carolina. 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 Min 0.05 Max 0 Average Price per clam ($) Figure 9. Retail prices for cultured hard clams in North Carolina. 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 Min 0.1 Max 0.05 Average 0 3 North Carolina Sea Grant ȋͳͷȌǤ ǡǡ Ǥ Ǥ ͶʹΨ ǡ͵ͺΨ Ψ ȋͳ ͳȌǤ Ǥ Percent of survey respondents ǡͻ ͻΨ Ǥ ΨȌ ȋͷΨ ǡ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ ȋȋ Ȍǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ͳͳ ǡ Ǥ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǡ Ψ ǡΨ ͷ Ǥ Ͷ ͶͲΨǡ Ǥ ǦǦ ͳͶΨ ǡ ʹͻΨǤ ͳͶΨ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥǡ ǡ ͵ Ǥ ȋ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ ̈́ ̈́͵ʹǡ̈́ʹͷ̈́͵ͺȋ ͳʹȌǤ ͵ͷ ͵ͲͶͷ ȋͳ͵ ͵ȌǤ 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Natural set Oyster relay Remote set Figure 11. Percent of growers that have tried and/or currently use various growing methods. 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% Rack and bag Bottom cage Chub system Previously Used Float bags Currently Used Figure 12. Survey results on the per bushel price of cultured oysters from NC leases. $40.0 $35.0 $30.0 $25.0 Min $20.0 Max $15.0 Average $10.0 $5.0 Industry Outlook Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ͵ͺ ͺΨǡ͵ͳΨ ʹΨ ȋͳ ͳͶȌǤ ǡ Ǥ North Caro olina Shellfish Industry I Figure 10. Methods of obtaining oyster seed for NC oyster producers. $0.0 Figure 13. Survey results of the individual price of cultured oysters from NC leases. $0.50 $0.45 $0.40 $0.35 $0.30 $0.25 $0.20 $0.15 $0.10 $0.05 $0.00 4 Min Max Average North Carolina Sea Grant Respondents (%) Figure 14. Level of concern for major issues surrounding the NC shellfish industry. 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Theft Predation Not concerned Water quality Leasing User conflict Marketing procedure Somewhat concerned Figure 15. Percent of survey respondents indicating issues that limited industry growth. Percent (%) 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 wa ter ... 0.0 Percent (%) Figure 16. Percent of survey respondents indicating the future of the NC shellfish industry. 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Growing Declining Stable Discussion Ǧ ȋ ǡʹͲͲͻȌǤǦ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ȋ ǡʹͲͳͳȌǡ Ǥ North Caro olina Shellfish Industry I 5 Concerned Hurricanes Climate Issues Very concerned ǡ Ǥ ǡ ͳͲ ǡ ǯ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ ǡͷΨǡ ͳͲǡ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡͳΨ ǡ ʹͷΨ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ ͷΨ Ǥ Ǧ ǦǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ North Carolina Sea Grant Ǥ Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥ ǯǡ ǡǡ Ǥ Ȅ Ǥ Ȅǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ ǡ Conclusion Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǤǦ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǤǡǦ ǡ ǯ Ǥ Ǥ ǤǦ ǡ ǡ͵ͺΨ Ǥ ǡʹͲΨ Ǥ References U.S. Census of Agriculture (USDA) 2007: Summary and State Data.ǡǤǤǣ Ǥ ȋ ǡʹͲͲͻǤ ȌͳʹǤͷ ǡ ǡǤǤǡǡǤʹͲͳͳǤVirginia Shellfish Aquaculture Situation and Outlook ReportǤ ͳǤ ȋȌǤ Ǥ ͓ ̈́͵ʹǡ ǦͳͳǦͲǤ ͵ͷ Ǥ ǤʹͲͲͻǤ Fisheries of the United States 2008Ǥ ǡ ǡǡǡ Ǥ ǣ ̴̷ Ǥ ͻͳͻȀͷͳ͵ǦͲͳʹʹ ǡ North Carolina Shellfish Industry 6 North Carolina Sea Grant