Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Biodiversity Targets Group Corridor workshop Dec 10, 2004 Santarem, Brazil Working Group Process • Came into working group with frequently asked questions • Additional questions identified through plenary process • Consolidated questions, prioritized through voting • Discussed prioritized subset of questions in working group • Remaining questions will be addressed subsequently in a process to be identified Questions 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Goal of a biodiversity conservation corridor How we build from KBAs to corridors Species targets Ecological process How do you decide where in a hotspot or wilderness areas where you want to go with corridor approach Monitoring indicators at corridor scale (should fall out if targets are clear) How does this compare with freshwater and marine What is the goal of a biodiversity conservation corridor? …to strengthen and complement species and site scale conservation actions while at the same time advancing human welfare. • Additional language to consider: avoid species extinction, persistence, connectivity. • Should we say advancing human welfare or maintaining/promoting/supporting/contributin g to human welfare? Building on species and site outcomes • Our primary goal is to avoid species extinctions. • Start with species outcomes, moves on to KBAs and corridors • Few species will persist in core areas if subpopulations are isolated and core areas are surrounded by an inhospitable land and resource use matrix. • In most cases, well-protected KBAs are necessary but not sufficient to avoid extinctions of species. • The principal benefits of a corridor approach are: –supplementary contributions to viable populations at species level –maintenance of essential ecological processes How do we identify and quantify species targets for corridors? • All species outcomes are targets for conservation at the landscape/ seascape scale. • But, some species are more likely to go extinct soon if not conserved at the landscape scale, while others will be ok for the shortterm if protected at the site scale. Quantifying targets • To plan for species persistence, we need to quantify species targets. • Options include: – Population Viability Analysis (PVAs) – Minimum Viable Population (MVP) – Red List Criteria Quantifying targets (contd) Our aim is to ensure that globally threatened species are no longer threatened and to ensure that species not yet globally threatened do not become globally threatened. Criteria • Migratory species (e.g. seasonal altitudinal migrants). • Sub-populations isolated through anthropogenic habitat fragmentation. • Area-demanding species (e.g. large home range, nomadic and naturally occurring at a low density) Estimating area and connectivity requirements • For area targets, need to assess habitat/ resource needs. • For connectivity targets, need to assess movement needs and dispersal capabilities.* • For population targets, need to assess threats** – where threats indicate need for habitat protection beyond sites, use analysis of habitat/ resource requirements and population density data as the base case for estimating area requirements. How do we build from KBAs to corridors? Sub-questions: • How to identify KBAs that require a corridor approach, and what should the criteria for these be? • Are there differences between hotspots and wilderness areas? Building from KBAs to corridors in hotspots • • Most KBAs will not be viable on their own and will require compatible land uses around them. Almost all KBAs should be embedded in a corridor approach. Given that our ultimate targets are species, not KBAs, and that we can’t create corridors for all KBAs, how do we decide where to go first? While most KBAs will require corridor approach in medium- and long-term, there are some species that need urgent action at the landscape scale. Decisions on where in a hotspot to start with a corridor should be driven by these species. Ecological processes at the landscape-scale 1)Defining ecological processes Crucial for persistence – MUST begin to incorporate Challenges – 1) identification of critical processes; 2) defining spatial/quantifiable targets “Flows of nutrients, water, energy, organisms, and other resources between landscape elements” Can split into species-driven and non-species driven 2)Targeting processes Need spatially explicit targets Species-driven processes: Many conserved at site-scale Some mediated by globally threatened keystones Others non-threatened – but keystone role Target ecological functional densities Non-species driven processes: E.g. disturbance regimes – minimum dynamic area E.g. hydrology – headwaters; whole watersheds 2) Targeting processes…continued Prioritization – some processes important over short time-scales – e.g. if flood pulse fails, immediate impacts Do we target all processes or only those where direct link is proven? 3) Wilderness areas and Hotspots HBWA = many processes probably intact – maintain processes; Hotspots = processes in decline? – restore processes 4) Processes and corridor design Use ecological processes to aid definition of corridor boundaries (e.g. watersheds; rivers; spatial requirements for metapopulation dynamics; disturbance processes) 5) Ecological processes and evolutionary processes Evolutionary processes also critical Brazil program already identifying – generating paper 6) Marine and freshwater processes Different processes and different threats (e.g. marine red-listed species more commonly threatened by exploitation than further habitat loss) Essential to integrate freshwater processes into terrestrial conservation planning (also consider marine) 7) Research questions What other processes need to be targeted at the corridor-scale? Need to understand connections between processes – e.g. flood – habitat change – metapopulation dynamics Which matrix land uses may contribute to the maintenance of key ecological processes at the landscape- scale? Which keystone species are critical (proven link)? For particular species - what constitutes an ecological functional density? NEED TO ROAD-TEST IN EXAMPLE CORRIDORS Differences for Wilderness Areas • In wilderness areas, we are trying to maintain the wilderness state: prevent species from becoming threatened and conserve key ecological processes. • In wilderness areas, will have fewer threatened species and possibly fewer KBAs. Species modeling and threat analysis can be combined to design corridor strategies. Will need to monitor ecological processes to make sure those processes remain healthy and intact. • We have more flexibility of where to put corridors responding to opportunities and predicted threat because species more widespread and not generally threatened. Integrating data • Most target species require management of core sites Key Biodiversity Areas • In most cases, target species will also require sites managed in a network within a compatible landscape to ensure connectivity, buffer against edge effects and maintain critical ecological processes • Identify target species that have area, connectivity or ecological process requirements beyond KBA scale. Then identify critical ecological processes relating to target species that can’t be conserved at KBA level alone. • In both hotspots and wilderness areas, this will be an iterative process. Integrating data (contd) • Within a hotspot/ hbwa, build from a species-byspecies approach to a set of biodiversity conservation corridors. • Corridor dimensions need to be adequate to support populations of species which need a landscape-scale approach (e.g. area-demanding spp.). • For internal structure, perhaps best to start with migratory species and fragmented subpopulations then add on area-demanding species. Research Questions Global research: • Analysis of globally threatened spp. (and paper) • Building in possible responses climate change (paper for SCB) • Evolutionary processes (paper by Brazil program) Applied research: • Test this approach in selected corridors • Building hydrological processes into selected corridors (possible collaboration with Wetlands International) • What are the main land/ resource uses which provide additional habitat/ connectivity for wide-ranging threatened species outside protected areas, contribute to the persistence of KBAs and/ or the maintenance of ecological processes? • Decision support software Decision Tools • Need to carry on testing and adapting existing decision support software Exchange Mechanisms • Peer learning study visits