Download Elasmobranchs

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Trophic Signatures of Elasmobranchs:
a Comparison between Tropical and
Temperate Ecosystems.
Rainer Froese
IfM Kiel
[email protected]
Trophic Signatures: Methods
• Get diet composition or food items
• Troph = 1 + weighted mean troph of food
• Example:
50% fish of troph 3
+ 50% fish of troph 4
+
1
= predator troph 4.5
Trophic Signatures: Methods
• Diet composition by weight or volume
• Monte Carlo routine to estimate diet with s.e.
from known food items (TrophLab)
• If no food known, use mean troph of congeners
or of family (troph varies less than food items)
• Data, TrophLab and Trophic Pyramids available
in www.fishbase.org
Trophic Signatures: All Marine Fish
5
4.5
All marine fish
(13,442)
Trophic Level
4
3.5
3.2
3
2.5
2
1
10
100
Num ber of Species
1000
10000
Trophic Signatures: Elasmobranchs
5
All marine fish
(13,442)
4.5
Trophic Level
4
Elasmo
(886)
3.5
3
2.5
2
1
10
100
Num ber of Species
1000
10000
Trophic Signatures: Sharks & Batoids
5
All marine fish
(13,442)
4.5
Trophic Level
4
Elasmo
(886)
3.5
Sharks
(394) Batoidei
(492)
3
2.5
2
1
10
100
Num ber of Species
1000
10000
Size by Trophic Level
5
All marine fish
4.5
Trophic Level
4
Elasmobranchs
3.5
3
2.5
2
0
50
100
150
Mean m ax. Length of Fish Species (cm TL)
200
Temperate vs Tropical
Marine fish
Elasmos (%)
All
Oceans
Deep
Sea
13,442
2,794
886 (7)
Troph 4+ (%) 241 (20)
313 (11)
74 (23)
Temperate
Subtropical
Tropical
1,620
2,610
6,248
261 (10)
237 (4)
89 (26)
60 (13)
68 (4)
18 (15)
Large Marine Ecosystems
Large Marine Ecosystems: Issues
• Definition (boarders) of LMEs
• Usually no checklists available
• What to do with `rare guests´
Trophic Signatures in LMEs
South China Sea
5
4.5
Trophic Level
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1
10
100
Num ber of Fish Species
1000
10000
Trophic Signatures in LMEs
Caribbean
5
4.5
Trophic Level
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1
10
100
Num ber of Fish Species
1000
10000
Trophic Signatures in LMEs
North Sea
5
4.5
Trophic Level
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1
10
100
Num ber of Fish Species
1000
10000
Trophic Signatures in LMEs
5
South China Sea
Caribbean
4.5
North Sea
New foundland
Trophic Level
4
Humboldt Current
3.5
3
2.5
2
1
10
100
Num ber of Fish Species
1000
Comparison of Ecosystems
All
South Caribbean Humboldt North NewOceans China S.
Current Sea foundland
Marine fish 13,442 2,488
Elasmo (%)
7
Troph 4+ (%) 20
1,467
724
186
141
7
8
11
13
12
21
31
24
26
20
Conclusions
• Elasmobranchs contribute about 7% to the diversity of
marine fishes
• Elasmobranchs constitute about 20% of the top
predators (troph 4+)
• No clear patterns of elasmobranch diversity emerge (yet)
from comaprisons between temperature zones or LMEs
• Trophic signatures of elasmobranchs are restricted to
higher trophic levels (>3), with most sharks above 3.5
and most batoids below 3.5
• Trophic signatures are evolutionary properties of
ecosystem with potential use for classifying LMEs
Acknowledgement
Thanks are due to the FishBase Team which
assembled the data used in this study.
Related documents