Download Digital Library (DL)

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Digital Library (DL)
Source: Information Processing & Management,
Special Issue, May 1999, by G. Marchionini
of UNC at Chapel Hill, and Ed Fox of VT
• Recap of “best of” phase I, and glimpses of
phase II
• Albeit the many aspects of research in DL,
focus for this lecture is on Access and
Visualization
Digital Library (DL)
Def: Research/application of digital technology
to the information problems addressed by
institutions such as libraries, museums,
schools, and publishers
Common features
• Sharable resources
• Large/Integrating across DLs, “middleware”
• Multiple stakeholders
Journal Components
Source: Ann Peterson Bishop from University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
• Typical Components are: Figures,
Conclusions, References, Table of Content,.
• Research focus on: Identify, retrieve, use, read
• Prototype (DeLIver) searches by component
• Learned from users:
– Components help decide whether read/obtain FT
– Components offer a synopsis/hints for content
Journal Components (cont.)
• Conclusions
– Nature of component use complex, and depends
on user type
– Is used during all stages of search/retrieval
– Components act as “metadata”
– Disassambly and reassambly is common practice
– Extend search capabilities on components
desirable
Requirements for Remote Access
Source: Robert Downs of Montclair State
University
• Most scholars prefer text, and selective print
• Prefer search terms boldfaced in retrieved
doc. Like the “Find” feature of browser
• Prefer natural language queries over
Boolean/SQL
• Work with small no. of docs, read and print
Meta-Search Engines
• In principle, they would diagnose which searengine(s) to use based on the query/topic,
user profile, search strategy,..
• March Chignell et.al., from The University of
Toronto conducted an evaluation of them:
– Performance of meta-search engines depends on
a basic level of performance of search engines
– Visualization of results obtained from metasearch engines needs to be improved
Visualization of DL Output
•
•
•
•
•
Latent Semantic Indexing
Pathfinder Network Scaling
Spatial maps
Author co-citation maps
More work is needed in evaluating the
usability of such visualization paradigms in
realistic digital library environments
Z39.50
• Def: A standard composed of specifications
for computer-to-computer linkage between
different information retrieval systems.
• Purpose: Encode the messages required to
communicate between two computers for
information search and retrieval purposes
• Beginnings: Exchange bibliographic
information regardless of the structure of
the underlying data
Z39.50 Services
• Initialize
– Create a Z39.50 association; e.g., defines how
the origen must operate
– Access control (pasw.) or Resource control
(confirm)
– Target negotiates these service parameters
• Search
– Type 0: requires private agreement on query form
– Type 1: standard Boolean query
• Present, Delete, and Release
Applications
• Wide Area Information Servers (WAIS)
– First full-text information retrieval architecture
composed of the client, the server, the database,
and the protocol
– Added format types, s.a., gif and postscript
• Library of Congress, OCLC, UC, Dartmouth
• Weakness: Lack of help or instructions for
searching the database
• Zweb, CNIDR, OCLC, AIDS,..