Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Cepheid Multiplicity and Masses: Fundamental Parameters Nancy Remage Evans • • • • • • • • September, 2011 Ed Guinan Scott Engle Howard Bond Gail Schaefer Derck Massa Charles Proffit Alexey Rastorguev Natalia Gorynya • • • • • • • • Poland Scott Wolk Massimo Marengo Margarita Karovska Ken Carpenter Erika Bohm-Vitense Joel Eaton Ignazio Pillitteri Leonid Berdnikov Cepheids • Extragalactic distance scale • Stellar evolution: • ``The Cepheid Mass Problem” • Asteroseismology • Star formation: massive binaries September 2011 Poland Outline • Star Formation • Binary Characteristics • • Hubble, Chandra, XMM Tr 16: X-Rays • Masses: Evolution • Velocity data September, 2011 Poland Cepheids • • • • • 4-7 M Formerly B stars Young ~50 Myr Post-RGB, core He burning Evolve without strong mass loss of O stars • Known distances September, 2011 Poland Part I: Multiplicity: Goals • Star Formation • Angular momentum • Low mass: well characterized • High mass: • rarer, broad lines, mass loss • Observations Binary, triple,…. Distribution of mass ratios Maximum separation HIGH VS LOW MASS STARS September 2011 Poland High Mass Companions: IUE Survey • • • • • • • Particularly complete binary information: Evolved cool stars: sharp lines Hot companions dominate in UV Observed the 75 brightest Cepheids with IUE All companions through early A detected 21% companions Using RV: 34% September, 2011 Poland Energy Distributions • Hot companions • Normalized at 1600 A • Generally very low reddening • Well determined spectral types, mass September, 2011 Poland IUE Example • Cepheid RT Aur • Compared with main sequence stars September, 2011 RT Aur Poland Mass Ratios • M2/M1 • Strong preference for low mass companions • Selection: orbital periods longer than 1 year • Contrast: binaries with P<40d: equal mass preference (Tokovinin, 2000) September, 2011 Poland Multiplicity: Completeness • Cepheids with orbits • 18 observed with IUE => hot companions known • Multiplicity? M2 unknown September, 2011 Poland Multiplicity: Completeness UV high res • High resolution UV spectra (HST, IUE): velocity of companion • 8 of 18 • 5 of 8 are triples September, 2011 Poland Multiplicity: Completeness Triples • Cepheids with orbits + companion spectrum • 8 (possibly 9) are triple: 44% (50%) September, 2011 Poland Hubble Snapshot Survey • HST WFC3 • V and I • Eta Aql • Hot companion known from IUE • No orbital motion September, 2011 Poland Eta Aql: T Mon Subtracted September, 2011 Poland Binary Parameters • IUE survey: identify all companions M > 2 M • 15 Cepheids • 11 have orbits, orb. motion => period • 3 resolved with WFC3 => separation • => period • (Eta Aql, V659 Cen, S Nor) • Compare distribution of separations of Cepheids (5 M) with solar mass stars (Raghavan et al., Duquennoy and Mayor) for q = M2 /M1 > 0.4 September, 2011 Poland Orbital Period Distributions • Cepheids vs Solar mass stars: different period distribution for comparions with mass ratio > 0.4 September, 2011 Poland Cepheids Solar Mass Hubble Snapshot Survey: Goal 2: Low Mass Stars • • • • • • Resolved companions HST WFC3 l Car ~40” x 40” V and I Young low mass stars produce X-rays • XMM image of l Car: no X-rays => old field stars September, 2011 Poland Low Mass Companions • Alpha Per Cluster: age of a typical Cepheid • Rosat observations: filled symbols are X-ray detections • Essentially all stars cooler than F5 V • Field stars would not be detected in X-rays September, 2011 Poland Low-Mass Companions: Chandra Observation of Polaris • Young, low mass stars prominent in X-rays • Center 3’ of ACIS-I field • Putative components marked • A = Aa + Ab • B F3 V • C, D • X-ray but no 2MASS: background AGN • Resolved companions 15 mag fainter September 2011 Poland HST Snapshot: Y Car September, 2011 Poland Low Mass Companions of B Stars B stars: comparable mass to Cepheids • Late B stars: no X-rays • X-rays taken to be from low mass companions • Identified late B stars in Tr 16 using photometry and proper motions • Chandra ACIS image: B stars: blue: detected; purple: not detected September, 2011 Poland Tr 16 Late B Stars • X-rays: dot => low mass companion ( 1.4 to 0.5 M ) • 39% of late B stars • Complementary estimate of more massive companions from IUE: 34% • Preliminary: q < 0.1 lacking September, 2011 Poland Part II: Masses as Evolutionary Benchmarks • Luminosity: mass of He burning core Core convective overshoot Rotation Radiative opacity Mass loss September, 2011 Poland Masses • Problem: mass mismatch between evolutionary and pulsation masses • Problem: blue loops September, 2011 Poland Measured Masses: Orbits • Orbits:the basis for dynamical masses • High quality radial velocities: Moscow Univ, CORAVEL, AST • Eg V350 Sgr September, 2011 Poland Mass: Binary Stars • Kepler’s Third Law • P2(M1 + M2) = A3 • • • • Solar system units P: period M1, M2: masses A: semi-major axis (separation) September, 2011 Poland Masses of Galactic Cepheids • • • • How? Ground-based spectroscopic orbit Inclination Double-lined spectroscopic binaries:high resolution UV spectroscopy: orbital velocity amplitude ratio + mass of secondary • Astrometric orbit of Cepheid (Benedict, et al.) + mass of secondary • Astrometric orbit of both (Polaris) September, 2011 Poland Masses of Galactic Cepheids • Padua, Geneva tracks: decreasing overshoot from left to right • S Mus,V350 Sgr: HST velocities • W Sgr, FF Aql: Benedict orbits • Polaris: HST September, 2011 Poland No overshoot S Mus • Hottest companion • GHRS high resolution velocities • Temperature September, 2011 Poland S Mus H2 • FUSE spectra • Standards reddened to match S Mus • H2 absorption September, 2011 Poland S Mus • Example S Mus, B3 V B5 V September, 2011 Poland W Sgr • Spectroscopic orbit: 4.3 yr • IUE: hot companion: A0 V • Small orbital velocity amplitude: faceon? • Inconsistent with reasonable Cepheid mass • Resolved? September, 2011 Poland W Sgr B 2625 A • STIS spectrum • Component B: resolved, hot • Spectroscopic binary: Cepheid Aa + Ab, cool 2800 A 0.16” Ceph +Comp Ab Comp B September, 2011 Poland W Sgr • Solid: extracted Cepheid Aa+ Ab spectrum • Dashed: Alp Aqr: slightly cooler than Cepheid • Ab not detected • MAb < 1.4 M • Mcep< 5.4 M September, 2011 Poland Polaris: Orbit • • • Pulsation velocity Orbit: Kamper (1996) Period: 30 years • Amplitude: 3.7 km/s September, 2011 Poland Polaris: Inclination • Wielen, et al. 2000 • Hipparcos proper motion • Nearly instantaneous in 30 year orbit • Derive inclination • 2 solutions September, 2011 Poland Polaris: HST • HST ACS • PSF • Comparison: white dwarfs September, 2011 Poland Polaris: Mass • • • • Dynamical mass Aa 4.5 + 2.2 /-1.4 M Ab 1.26 +/- 0.14 Orbital motion September, 2011 Poland Summary: Masses • Masses: challenge to improve errors September, 2011 Poland Binary Properties • (Return to Part I) • Accurate velocities • For some stars span of 30 years • Identify velocity shift of 2 km/s between years (corrected for pulsation) September 2011 Poland Detection Probability (%) • For an orbit with 5 Msun primary • Ignore eccentricity • For M2, P compute • orbital velocity • Detect 2 km/s velocity shift • Compute inclination (detection probability) • Work in progress September 2011 Poland P (yr) 1 3 10 30 q M2 0.3 1.5 100 99 99 97 0.1 0.5 98 95 89 77 Summary: Multiplicity • New Multiwavelength Approaches/Results: • 44% (maybe 50%) of binaries are triples • Favor small mass ratios for P > 1 year • HST high resolution images • Period distribution: differences • between high and low mass stars • Resolved low mass companions: X-rays • Late B stars: 39% low mass companions • Velocities: orbits and limits September 2011 Poland