Download AS 3004 Stellar Dynamics

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Determining orbits from radial
velocities
• Observe system over n times (observations)
– n observations
– V = F(K,e,w,g,T,P)
n (Vr, t)
– since T,P enter expression for V via q,
– from time of observation t, estimates or known values of
P,e,T, hence E (ecc. anomoly)
2
E  esin E 
(t  T)
P
– Thus:
1
2
q  1  e
E 
tan    
 tan  
2  1  e
2 
• what are values of (K,e,w,g,T,P) that best represent
observations
• requires least squares procedure
AS 3004
Stellar Dynamics
Application to Binary Pulsars
• binary system where one star is a pulsar
– emits ‘pulses’ of radiation
– accurate timing possible (accurate clocks)
– need narrow pulses
– radio signals from neutron stars
• solitary pulsar
– if at 0 velocity relative to us
– time between pulses, dt = constant (unless being spun
up/down)
– if at Vrel relative velocity
– dt = constant x pulse number
– if pulsar spins up, dt decreases with pulse number
– concave curve
– if pulsar spins down, dt increases with pulse number
– convex curve
AS 3004
Stellar Dynamics
Pulsar Timing
• In binary system, time between pulses affected by
orbital motions
– due to light travel time (distance) changing along orbit
AS 3004
Stellar Dynamics
Pulsar timing II
• Projected distance across orbit at any time t is
– z = r sin (q+w) sin i
• For the pulsar orbit
– rp = ap (1-e2) / (1+ e cosq)
• So the light travel time is
z 
c
a p sin i
c
sin(q  w )
(1  e )
1  e cos q
2
for a circular orbit w =0, e=0
a
sin
i
2

p
z 
sin (t  T0 )
c
 P

c
AS 3004
Stellar Dynamics
light travel time
AS 3004
Stellar Dynamics
Pulsar timing III
• Hence, time difference between predicted , jn t, and
actual (binary) pulse arrival times, tn is
2 (t  T0 ) 
t  t n  jn t  at  b sin 



P
– where P is the orbital period, T0 is a reference time and a,b are
determined by the velocity of the pulsar
– a: from systematic velocity
– b: from Keplerian velocity
– for circular orbits: b = ap/c sini
AS 3004
Stellar Dynamics
Mass determinations
• If optically visible companion
– OB star in massive X-ray binaries
– A-F star in low-mass X-ray binaries
2 12
(1  e )
ac sin i 
Kc P
2
hence, the mass function is
m2 sin 3 i
f (m) 
(m1  m2 ) 2
and the mass ratio, q,
mp
ac sin i
q

mc a p sin i
– If inclination, i, can be found, then mass follow directly
AS 3004
Stellar Dynamics
Frequency shifts
• Binary orbit also affects pulsar frequency
– radio pulsars , very narrow pulse widths
– pulse frequency affected by orbital velocity
– Doppler shift:
Vrad
z
f  f
 f
c
c
– gives a phase lag of:
t
z
   f dt  f 0 t  T0 
c
T0
z
 f0
c
AS 3004
z

c

Stellar Dynamics
Pulsar Phase lag
• Combined phase lag is
– from light travel time due to orbit
z
 L   f
c
– and from Doppler shift
z  z 
 D  f 0  
c c
– hence
–
 z   z

   D   L     f 0  f 0  f0 (t  T0 )
 c  c

generally
 D  0.001 L
– but measurable in radio pulsars
AS 3004
Stellar Dynamics
Eclipsing Binaries
• Determine binary properties from eclipsing
systems
– sizes, shapes of stars, temps, apsidal motion
AS 3004
Stellar Dynamics
Eclipsing systems
• Four contact points
– obscuring star touching background star entering eclipse
– obscuring star fully in front of background star
– touching rim on entering
– touching rim on exiting
– obscuring star touching background star exiting eclipse
• Relative sizes
2 R2








 2 1  4 3 
2a
3  1    4   2  
AS 3004
2 R1
2a
Stellar Dynamics
Partial Eclipse
AS 3004
Stellar Dynamics
Light Curves
AS 3004
Stellar Dynamics
Related documents