Download ppt - ciera

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Standard solar model wikipedia, lookup

White dwarf wikipedia, lookup

Nucleosynthesis wikipedia, lookup

History of X-ray astronomy wikipedia, lookup

P-nuclei wikipedia, lookup

First observation of gravitational waves wikipedia, lookup

X-ray astronomy wikipedia, lookup

X-ray astronomy detector wikipedia, lookup

Supernova wikipedia, lookup

Planetary nebula wikipedia, lookup

Cosmic distance ladder wikipedia, lookup

Cygnus X-1 wikipedia, lookup

Main sequence wikipedia, lookup

Astronomical spectroscopy wikipedia, lookup

Astrophysical X-ray source wikipedia, lookup

Stellar evolution wikipedia, lookup

Star formation wikipedia, lookup

Transcript
A Slow X-ray Pulsar in the
Young, Massive Star Cluster
Westerlund 1
M. Muno
S. Dougherty
J. S. Clark
R. De Grijs
P. Crowther
C. Law
S. McMillan
D. Pooley
M. Morris
S. Portegies
Zwart
I. Negueruela
F. Yusef
Zadeh
2MASS Atlas
Image
A Galactic Super Star Cluster
•
•
•
•
•
Distance: 5kpc
Mass: 105 Msun
Core radius: 0.6 pc
Extent: ~6 pc across
Core density:~106 pc3
2MASS Atlas Image
• Age: 4 +/- 1 Myr
• Supernova rate: 1
every 10,000 years
Chandra Observations
WR/O star binaries,
plus unresolved
pre-MS stars
Two exposures:
2005 May, 18 ks
2005 June, 38
ks
This is a pulsar!
Pulsar CXO J164710.2455216
• Period: 10.6107(1) s
• Spin-down: <2x10-10 s s-1
• LX = 3x1033 erg s-1 (not a
radio pulsar)
• Spectrum: kT = 0.6 keV
blackbody (not a cooling
NS)
• No IR counterpart, so
K>18.5 (Mcount. < 1Msun;
not an X-ray binary)
This pulsar is almost
certainly a magnetar.
The Pulsar is within
Westerlund 1(99.95% conf.)
• A search of 300 archival
Chandra and XMM
fields reveals no new 530 s pulsars, so there is
a <0.5% chance of
finding a magnetar in
any field (Nechita,
Gaensler, Muno, et al.
in prep).
• The pulsar is well within
the cluster, with a <10%
chance of being an
unrelated X-ray source.
Position of pulsar
Expected density of interlopers
(dashed line, very small number)
•
The Progenitor to the Pulsar
had an Initial Mass of >40
M
Westerlund 1 contains sun
O6V and O7V stars with
initial masses of 35-37
Msun (Clark et al., in prep).
• Its age is <5 Myr.
• At this age, only stars
more massive than 40
Msun would have undergone supernovae.
Massive Stars and Magnetars
• The Westerlund 1 pulsar is the third
example of a magnetar with a >30 Msun
progenitor.
– An HI shell has been interpreted as a bubble
blown by a 30-40 Msun progenitor to 1E 1048.15397 (Gaensler et al 2005).
– SGR 1806-20 is thought to belong to a <4.5 Myr
old star cluster, so its progenitor was > 50 Msun
(e.g., Figer et al. 2005).
Note that SGR 1900+15 may belong to a <10 Myr old cluster, so its
progenitor was > 20 Msun (Vrba et al. 2000).
Conclusions
• Massive stars can lose 95% of their
mass either through winds or during
supernovae (e.g., Heger et al 2003, Akiyama &
Wheeler 2005).
• Magnetars probably form from rapidlyrotating cores, in stars that evolved too
quickly to dissipate their angular
momentum (e.g., Duncan & Thomas 1992; Heger
et al. 2005).