Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Air Travel Forecast Problem Objectives • Introduction to forecasting methods • Experience with Delphi • Experience with consensus-seeking techniques • Strength/weaknesses of various methods Air Travel Forecast Problem 1 Methodology Tree for Forecasting Knowledge source Judgmental Others Unstructured Univariate Self Role Structured Multivariate Data- Theorybased based No role Intentions/ expectations Role playing (Simulated interaction) Unaided judgment Statistical Conjoint analysis Extrapolation models Quantitative analogies Data mining Neural nets Rule-based forecasting Feedback No feedback Prediction markets Delphi Structured analogies Linear Game theory Air Travel Forecast Problem Decomposition Judgmental bootstrapping Expert systems Causal models Classification Segmentation Methodology Tree for Forecasting forecastingpriciples.com JSA-KCG September 2005 2 Techniques for Forecasting Form groups of about 5 to 7 people, then use the: Delphi procedure First estimate – individual and anonymous Statistical summary – group Group discussion (use consensus technique) Second estimate – individual and anonymous Statistical summary - group Air Travel Forecast Problem Minutes 12 3 20 2 3 40 3 Group Results Accuracy Rankings: (Round 2) Group 1 2 3 4 5 Average ranks Judgment Bootstrapping Segmentation Causal model Extrapolations Air Travel Forecast Problem 4 Discussion Discuss Delphi Expected results When to use Actual Results Initial hypotheses Results in Air Travel study Calculation of your error score Conclusions Air Travel Forecast Problem 5 Delphi Agreement among experts Your results More agreement among panelists on Round 1 No differences (Round 1 vs. 2) More agreement on Round 2 _____ _____ _____ Findings from literature: Typically more agreement on later rounds Expected accuracy: Which do you expect to be closest to actual ranks? Your opinions Round 1 more accurate _____ Round 2 more accurate _____ No difference _____ Delphi improves accuracy vs. traditional meetings given some expertise among panelists Air Travel Forecast Problem 6 Round 2: Previous Rankings vs. Your Rankings Average Ranking MBA (21 groups)* Adv. Mgmt. (28 groups)* Judgment 2.2 2.4 Bootstrapping 3.2 2.9 Segmentation 2.2 2.0 Causal 2.6 2.9 Extrapolation 4.7 4.8 Method You *Groups from U.S., Sweden, Norway, and Netherlands Air Travel Forecast Problem 7 Evidence-based Findings (“>” means “more accurate than”) 1. Objective methods > subjective: especially for large changes 2. Causal methods > naïve: especially for large changes 3. Bootstrapping > Judgment 4. Structured meetings > unstructured Air Travel Forecast Problem 8 Using the Selection Tree Sufficient objective data Judgmental methods ? No Quantitative methods Yes Good knowledge of relationships Large changes expected No Yes Conflict among a few decision makers Policy analysis No Yes No Accuracy feedback Yes No Yes Yes Cross-section Similar cases exist No No Yes No Judgmental bootstrapping/ Decomposition Large changes likely No Time series Yes Good domain knowledge Policy analysis Type of knowledge Domain Yes Type of data Policy analysis Unaided judgment Delphi/ Prediction markets No Yes Yes No Self Conjoint analysis Intentions/ expectations Role playing (Simulated interaction/ Game theory) No Single method Use unadjusted forecast Structured analogies Several methods provide useful forecasts Omitted information ? No Yes Quantitative analogies Yes Combine forecasts Use adjusted forecast Expert systems Rule-based forecasting Extrapolation/ Neural nets/ Data mining Causal models/ Segmentation Selection Tree for Forecasting Methods forecastingprinciples.com JSA-KCG January 2006 9 Rankings based on Evidence-based Findings Method Rank Why? Causal model 1.5 Segmentation 1.5 Extrapolation 3 Objective and naïve Bootstrapping 4 Objective/subjective and causal Judgment 5 Subjective and causal Objective and causal Evidence summarized in Armstrong (1985), Long-Range Forecasting, and Armstrong (2001), Principles of Forecasting – see forecastingprinciples.com Air Travel Forecast Problem 10 Accuracy of the Different Methods of Forecasting U.S. Air Travel, 1963-1968 (Successive updating used) Forecast Horizon Years Ahead 1 2 3 4 5 6 Averages (Number of Forecasts) Mean Absolute Percentage Error* Extrapolation Judgment Econometric (6) (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) 5.7 12.7 17.4 22.5 27.5 29.9 6.8 15.6 25.1 34.1 42.1 45.0** 4.2 6.8 7.3 9.8 6.2 0.7 (21) 19.3 28.1 5.8 * The forecasts were lower than actual in nearly all cases. ** Estimated Source: Armstrong & Grohman (1972) in full text at forecastingprinciples.com Air Travel Forecast Problem 11 Average Error Scores* MBAs Advanced Mgt. Forecasting Experts You *Key: Best possible No information (all ties) Worst possible Air Travel Forecast Problem Round 2 7.4 7.5 8.4 = 0 = 6 = 12 12 General Advice • Beware of unaided judgment • Be conservative when uncertain – thus, use equal ranks given uncertainty about most accurate method Air Travel Forecast Problem 13