Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
DEMAND MODELING APPROACH FOR ENERGY SERVICES MODELING COLLOQUIUM 31 JULY 2012 Dr R Maserumule Demand Modeling Specialist 1 Department of Energy Energy Demand in South Africa Petroleum Products 5% Percentage of Total Consumption Nonspecified 6% Agriculture 2% This what we collect Residential 18% Industry 37% Residential Usage Renewabl es & Waste 33% Electricity 25% Coal 37% Electrical Appliances 5% Transport 29% Commercial 8% This what we need for the IEP Residential Usage Lighting 15% Space Heating 25% Cooking 25% Water Heating 30% 2 3 South African Context • Studies on end use once off – Institute Energy Studies (Early 1990’s) – Eskom (2012) – Department of Energy (2009, 2012) 4 Three Basic Approaches to Forecasting • Judgmental: Obtained by asking a group of experts about the behavior of the population. • Econometric: Obtained by analysing the time series of historical population • Engineering: Obtained through small scale studies of a controlled population Hybrid Approach Phase One: EngineeringPhase Two: EconometricUse existing studies on the use of energy carriers Project the demand for each energy carrier using for end use services historical data (DoE(Institute for Energy Energy Balances, EskomStudies 1993, Frost & Electricity Sales) Sullivan 2012, Department of Energy 2012) 6 Hybrid Approach Phase One: Engineering- Use existing studies on the use of energy carriers for end use services (Institute for Energy Studies 1993, Frost & Sullivan 2012, Department of Energy 2012) 7 Total Energy Carriers (303805 TJ) Electricity End Use (83695 PJ) 3% Electricity, 83965, 28% Coal, 182119, 60% Gas, 37721, 12% Lighting 4% Fans 6% Motors 40% Compressors 8% HVAC Total Energy Services (303805 TJ) Process Heat 39% Lighting , 3358.6, 1% Gas End Use (37721 TJ) Process Heat 100% Compressor, 6717.2, 2% Motors, 33586, 11% HVAC, 2518.95, 1% Fans, 5037.9, 2% Process Heat, 252586.35, 83% Coal End Use (182119 TJ) Process Heat 100% 8 Overview of Demand Models (112) Sector Number of Demand Models Residential (4 sub sectors) •Low Income Non-electrified •Low Income Electrified •Middle Income Electrified •High Income Electrified 22 demand models Commercial 6 demand models Industrial (9 sub sectors) •Iron and Steel •Basic Chemicals •Non-ferrous Metals •Rest of Basic Metals •Gold Mining •Coal Mining •Platinum Mining •Other Mining •Rest of Manufacturing 72 demand models Agriculture 9 demand models Transport 3 demand models 9 Opportunities for Collaboration • Continuous detailed sector studies on end use – Measure carbon footprint – Opportunities for deploying energy efficiency interventions 10 Hybrid Approach Phase Two: Econometric-Project the demand for each energy carrier using historical data (DoE-Energy Balances, Eskom-Electricity Sales) 11 Bottom Up Approach Sector/Sub Sector Activity Variable Residential Total number of households Commercial Commercial floor space Agriculture Tons of agricultural output Iron and Steel Tons of iron and steel Chemical Tons of chemical Non-ferrous Metals Tons of non-ferrous metals Rest of Basic Metals Tons of output for the remaining metals Gold Mining Tons of gold Platinum Mining Tons of platinum Other Mining Tons of other mining output Rest of Manufacturing Tons of production for total manufacturing 12 Opportunities for Collaboration • Common dataset for historical energy consumption – DoE energy balances – Eskom electricity sales – Other data sets • Common dataset for macroeconomic data • GDP growth • Activity variables – Population (total number of households) – Physical Production (tons of coal, tons of gold) 13 THANK YOU 14