Download treatment based on appearance

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Media and gender wikipedia , lookup

Racism in the LGBT community wikipedia , lookup

Occupational inequality wikipedia , lookup

Racial inequality in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Sexual racism wikipedia , lookup

Racial stereotyping in advertising wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
 Kacius 1 Stephanie Kacius Mrs. Ryan Advanced Learner 16 March 2015 How Are People Treated Based Upon Their Appearance? Since birth we’re told what to think. Our parents, friends, teachers, the media, school, and work all influence our everyday lives but not only that, our everyday thinking. Just living life and experiencing events changes and manipulates our thinking. There are indications that contemporary mainstream media reinforce negative stereotypes about minorities (Valentino, Hutchings, White). We are affected by all our surroundings and because of that our perception of others is heavily influenced and constantly changing. Therefore, society favors certain physical characteristics of individuals, which results in unfair treatment and discrimination towards individuals. The main characteristics that society looks at are height, gender, weight, and race. These traits all affect the way that society treats and thinks of individuals. One of the first main traits that is evaluated during a first impression is height. Whether an individual is short or tall, it makes a big difference in how society sees them. Tall men are more likely to attain leadership positions (Lindqvist). US Presidents tend to be significantly taller than the average height in the US male population (Persico et al). Tall people are seen as more persuasive (Baker and Redding, Zebrowitz, Young and French), impressive (Kurtz) and capable (Hensley). An increase in height by 10 cm is associated with a 5.8 percent higher wage (Lindqvist). In universities, assistant professors are 1.24 inches taller, associate professors are 1.5 Kacius 2 inches taller, and professors are 1.97 inches taller than the average individual of their age and gender (Hensley). Fifty two department chairmen averaged 2.14 inches taller than others of their age and gender (Hensley). The stereotype of gender profiling is one stereotype that has been alive since the dawn of time. It was shown that there were less favorable attitudes toward female than male leaders and potential leaders, although this female disadvantage should have decreased over time (Eagly, Karau). When are women compared to men the difference between them is very visible. [White men] earn more [wages] than any other gender/race category (Acker). Both white women and women of color are at the bottom of the wage hierarchy (Acker). Even in physically attractive people there was a difference in the qualities associated with them. Men were thought to possess positive intellectual qualities such as scientific and negative social attributes such as sternness (Eagly, Makhijani, Ashmore, Longo). In contrast, women were associated with negative intellectual qualities such as naivete and positive social attributes such as helpfulness (Eagly, Makhijani, Ashmore, Longo). In T.V., men outnumbered women among white, black, Latino, and Native American depictions; however, among Asian American characters, women and men were equivalent in number (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Among male characters, Scheffe tests showed blacks and Latinos significantly more likely than whites to be portrayed in major roles (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). For females, only blacks were significantly more likely than whites to be represented in major roles (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Kacius 3 Our culture values thinness and perpetuates societal messages that obesity is the mark of a defective person (Friedman, Puhl). Overweight people face discrimination in employment, education, and health care (Puhl R, Heuer C.). Women appear particularly vulnerable: over one­quarter (27%) of them report employment discrimination (Roehling MV, Roehling PV, Pichler S). Overweight and obese applicants are viewed as having poor self­discipline, low supervisory potential, poor personal hygiene, and less ambition and productivity (Agerström, Bellizzi JA, Hasty RW, Everett M, Giel KE, Thiel A, Teufel M, Mayer J, Zipfel S., Rooth DO, Rudolph CW, Wells CL, Weller MD, Baltes BB). They are also viewed as lazy, less competent, and lacking in self­discipline by their employers and coworkers (Roehling MV., Shapiro JR, King EB, Quinones MA). [Out of ] 400 doctors, one of every three listed obesity behind only drug addiction, alcoholism, and mental illness. They associated obesity with noncompliance, hostility, dishonesty, and poor hygiene (Klein D, Najman J, Kohrman AF, Muncro C). Doctors hold stereotypes of them [overweight and obese individuals] as lazy, lacking in self­control, non­compliant, unintelligent, weak­willed, sloppy and dishonest (Bocquier A, Verger P, Basdevant A, Foster GD, Wadden TA, Makris AP, Harvey EL, Hill AJ., Huizinga MM, Cooper LA, Bleich SN, Clark JM, Beach MC., Persky S, Eccleston CP., Puhl RM., Puhl RM, Heuer CA). Teachers say overweight students are untidy, more emotional, less likely to succeed at work, and more likely to have family problems (Neumark­Sztainer D, Story M, Harris T). Peers view obese children as undesirable playmates who are lazy, stupid, ugly, mean, and unhappy (Friedman, Puhl). Kacius 4 It may be that despite the change in stereotype ​
content​
over the years, there has remained, a coherent consistent stereotype of Blacks (Devine, Elliot). In a study done of the traits people thought of African American people 74% thought they were athletic, 57% thought rhythmic, 46% thought low in intelligence, 45% thought poor, 45% thought lazy, 40% thought loud, 35% thought criminal, 25% thought hostile, and 14% thought ignorant (Katz, Braly, Gilbert, Karlins, Coffman, Walters, Dovidio, Gaertner, Devine, Elliot). On primetime television, blacks are portrayed as the most hot­tempered men on television (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Blacks were significantly more likely than whites to appear in crime dramas (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Blacks were significantly more likely than whites to be depicted as officers of the court (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Among women, black characters were most often found in medical roles (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Black men discussed work most often and significantly more so than whites (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). In education, african american students face negative cultural stereotypes that portray members of their ethnic group as less intelligent than European Americans (Steele). It’s generally assumed that all Asian Americans are high­achieving model minorities (Lee). In the Katz and Braly stereotyping study, Japanese were seen as intelligent, industrious, progressive, and shrewd (i.e., competent) but shy and quiet (unsociable) (Lin, Kwan, Cheung, Fiske). Chinese were sly (implying competence) but conservative, tradition loving, superstitious, and loyal to family (implying deficient mainstream sociability) (Lin, Kwan, Cheung, Fiske). A review of Asian American stereotypes over time further demonstrates that the dominant group tends to characterize Asians along the lines of competence and unsociability (Lin, Kwan, Kacius 5 Cheung, Fiske). Chinese and Japanese Americans were being viewed as competent (intelligent, industrious) yet lacking in sociability with the dominant group (loyal to family, quiet, shy) (Karlins, Coffman, & Walters; Maykovich). The model minority stereotype is the most contemporary view of Asian Americans; it emphasizes their perceived competence by portraying them as diligent and successful in their economic and educational endeavors (Lin, Kwan, Cheung, Fiske). Today, Asian Indians have the highest levels of economic and educational attainment among AAPI [Asian and Pacific Islander] ethnic groups (Lee, Kumashiro). In education, teachers were found to hold the highest expectations for Asian­American students (Tenenbaum, Ruck). When asked, students were both aware of and endorsed the stereotype that Asians are better at math than Whites (Cvencek, O’Connor, Wischnia, Nasir, Meltzoff). At 12.5% of the population, Latinos constitute the largest racial /ethnic minority group in the United States. Yet research suggests that they remain dramatically underrepresented on television compared with real­world figures—typically comprising 1% to 3% of the prime time television population. (Bradley, Greenberg, Mastro, Brand, Bryant, Zillmann, Erlbaum). Latino images on television remain infrequent and well below real­world census figures (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Latino males were shown to have lower job authority and were depicted less frequently in professional occupations than were other male characters (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Latinos were the youngest, most inappropriately dressed characters, with the heaviest accents on television (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Among men, Latinos also were generally thinner and more attractive than their on­air counterparts (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Longstanding stereotypes depict an image of Latinos as addictively romantic, sensual, sexual, Kacius 6 and even exotically dangerous (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Latino men were the least intelligent and least articulate characters (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Latinas were the laziest characters in prime time (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Further, they were the least intelligent, most verbally aggressive, embodied the lowest work ethic, and (alongside whites) were the most ridiculed (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). No race­based differences for men emerged on motivation, work ethic, respect, physical aggression, verbal aggression, or sexual aggression (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). For women, no differences based on race were revealed for motivation, physical aggression, or sexual aggression (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Latinos appeared significantly more often in sitcoms than whites (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Latinos were significantly more often family members compared with whites (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Latinas and whites were most often identified as family members (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Latino men most frequently discussed crime and topics identified as "other" (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Latinos portrayed significantly lower in job authority than whites (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Latino men were generally deemed most physically appealing among males (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). In education, latino/a students face negative cultural stereotypes that portray members of their ethnic group as less intelligent than European Americans (Steele). History has shown how the European American race is dominant as seen in actions and events. Positive traits are more strongly associated with whites than with blacks, and negative characteristics are more strongly associated with blacks than with whites (Dovidio, Evans, Tyler). On primetime television, Latinas and female whites were most often identified as family members (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). White women significantly higher in social authority than Kacius 7 Latinas (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). White women were the most attractive among females (Mastro, Behm­Morawitz). Jim Crow Laws, and other similar laws, not only repressed African Americans, but dehumanized them in the eyes of white people who were deemed superior (Butler). Some of the most studied academic stereotypes in childhood and adolescence pertain to African Americans and Latinos, who are stereotypically portrayed as “caring less about school” or as being “less intelligent” (Okeke, Howard, Kurtz­ Costes, & Rowley) than their White and Asian counterparts. Teachers held more positive expectations for European American students than Latino/a or African American students (Tenenbaum, Ruck). White stereotypes are more three­dimensional, pluralistic, and even contradictory in nature, whereas non white stereotypes, especially black and Latina/o ones, characterize these groups in a one­dimensional, monolithic manner (Croom). An individual's genetics and the features they inherit from their parents majorly affects the first impression they have on other people before they ever get to speak. Mankind has a established a preference for physical characteristics of people and because of this humanity treats those who don’t fit the description unfairly and discriminate against them. Whether an individual is short or tall, it makes a big difference in how society sees them. The male preference has been present since the dawn of time. Overweight people face discrimination in employment, education, and health care. It may be that despite the change in stereotype ​
content​
over the years, there has remained, a coherent consistent stereotype of Blacks. It’s generally assumed that all Asian Americans are high­achieving model minorities. Latinos constitute the largest racial /ethnic minority group in the United States, but are underrepresented and face undermining stereotypes. Kacius 8 History has made European Americans the prefered race. Therefore, the tall, thin, white male, in our current state, has acquired the preferential treatment. We let others dictate what we think from birth till death. Our thinking is ever changing and it is reflected in our actions. So the question is, how will society think of others, who do not fit this current description, in the future? Will society ever change? Works Cited Acker, Joan. INEQUALITY REGIMES Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2015. <​
http://www.reclaimingfutures.org/members/sites/default/files/documents/inequality_regimes.pd
f​
>. Agerström J, Rooth, DO. The role of automatic obesity stereotypes in real hiring discrimination. J Appl Psychol.2011;. Bellizzi JA, Hasty RW. Territory assignment decisions and supervising unethical selling behavior: The effects of obesity and gender as moderated by job­related factors. J Pers Sell Sales Manag. 1998; 2:35­49; Everett M.Let an overweight person call on your best customers? Fat chance. Sales Market Manag. 1990; 142:66­70; Giel KE, Thiel A, Teufel M, Mayer J, Zipfel S. Weight bias in work settings – a qualitative review. Obes Facts. 2010;3(1):33–40.; Pingitore R, Dugoni R, Tindale S, Spring B. Bias against overweight job applicants in a simulated employment interview. J Appl Psychol. 1994; 79: 909­17; Rooth DO. Obesity, attractiveness, and differential treatment in hiring; A field experiment. J Hum Resour. Kacius 9 2009;44(3):710­735; Rudolph CW, Wells CL, Weller MD, Baltes BB. A meta­analysis of empirical studies of weight bias in the workplace. J Vocat Behav. 2009;74(1):1­10. Baker, E., & Redding, W. C. (1962), “The effects of perceived tallness in persuasive speaking: An experiment”, Journal of Communication, 12, 51–53. Bocquier A, Verger P, Basdevant A et al. Overweight and obesity: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of general practitioners in France. Obes Res 2005;13:787–795. Foster GD, Wadden TA, Makris AP et al. Primary care physicians’ attitudes about obesity and its treatment. Obes Res. 2003;11:1168–1177.; Harvey EL, Hill AJ. Health professionals’ views of overweight people and smokers. Int J Obes. 2001;25:1253–1261. Huizinga MM, Cooper LA, Bleich SN, Clark JM, Beach MC. Physician respect for patients with obesity. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(11):1236–9.Persky S, Eccleston CP. Medical student bias and care recommendations for an obese versus non­obese virtual patient. Int J Obes. 2011;35:728­ 735.; Puhl RM. (2001) Op. cit.; Puhl RM, Heuer CA. (2009) Op cit. Butler, Emily. Racism in The Hole Book. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2015. <​
http://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=dittman&sei­redi
r=1&referer=https%3A%2F%2Fscholar.google.com%2Fscholar%3Fstart%3D10%26q%3Dwhit
e%2Bsuperior%2Bstereotypes%26hl%3Den%26as_sdt%3D0%2C14%26as_ylo%3D2014#searc
h=%22white%20superior%20stereotypes%22​
>. Kacius 10 Children Now, Latinozvooil and TV: Prime Time for a Reality Check (Oakland, CA: Children Now, 2000); Bradley S. Greenberg, Dana E. Mastro, and Jeffrey E. Brand, "Minorities and the Mass Media: Television into the 21st Century," in Mciiia Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, ed. Jennings Bryant and Dolf Zillmann (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, 2002), 333­51; NCLR, "Out of the Picture: Hispanics in the Media," in State of Hispanic America 1994 (Washington, DC: National Council of La Raza, 1994). Croom, A. M. (2011). Slurs, stereotypes, and in­equality: A critical review of “How Epithets and Stereotypes are Racially Unequal”. Language Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.03.001 Cvencek, Dario, Na’ilah S. Nasir, Kathleen O’Connor, Sarah Wischnia, and Andrew N. Meltzoff. The Development of Math–Race Stereotypes: “They Say Chinese People Are the Best at Math”. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2015. <​
http://ilabs.uw.edu/sites/default/files/Cvencek_Nasir_et_al_in_press.pdf​
>. Devine, Patricia G., and Andrew J. Elliot. Are Racial Stereotypes Really Fading? The Princeton Trilogy Revisited. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2015. <​
http://www.psych.rochester.edu/research/apav/publications/documents/1995_DevineElliot_Are
racialstereotypesreallyfading.pdf​
>. Kacius 11 Dovidio, John F., Nancy Evans, and Richard B. Tyler. "Racial Stereotypes: The Contents of Their Cognitive Representations." Diss. Colgate U, n.d. Abstract. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Mar. 2015. <​
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022103186900399​
>. Eagly, Alice H., and Steven J. Karau. Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Mar. 2015. <​
http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/81424/1/wp835.pdf​
>. Eagly, Alice H., Richard D. Ashmore, Mona G. Makhijani, and Laura C. Longo.What Is Beautiful Is Good, But. . .: A Meta­Analytic Review of Research on the Physical Attractiveness Stereotype. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2015. <​
http://www.uni­muenster.de/imperia/md/content/psyifp/aeechterhoff/wintersemester2011­12/vo
rlesungkommperskonflikt/eaglyetal_metaaphysattracstereo_psychbull1991.pdf​
>. Friedman, Roberta R., and Rebecca M. Puhl. WEIGHT BIAS A Social Justice Issue A Policy Brief. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2015. <​
http://www.uconnruddcenter.org/resources/upload/docs/what/reports/Rudd_Policy_Brief_Weig
ht_Bias.pdf​
>. Hensley, W. E. (1993), “Height as a measure of success in academe”, Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 30, 40–46. Kacius 12 Karlins, M., Coffman, T. L., & Walters, G. (1969). On the fading of social stereotypes: Studies in three generations of college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 1­16. Katz, Braly, Gilbert, Karlins, Coffman, Walters, Dovidio, Gaertner, Patricia G. Devine, and Andrew J. Elliot. Frequency of Trait Selection (in Percentage of Respondents Who Selected the Trait) in the Five­Starred­Traits Task of the Present Study and Four Previous Studies. N.d. Raw data. N.p. Klein D, Najman J, Kohrman AF, Muncro C. Patient characteristics that elicit negative responses from family physicians. J Fam Prac. 1982; 14: 881­88. Kurtz, D. L. (1969). “Physical appearance and stature: Important variables in sales recruiting”, Personnel Journal, 48, 981–983. Lee, Stacey J., Ph.D., and Kevin K. Kumashiro, Ph.D. "A Report on the Status of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in Education: Beyond the “Model Minority” Stereotype." Diss. N.d. National Education Association. Web. 15 Mar. 2015. <​
http://friendsofpubliced.org/wp­content/uploads/2014/02/Status­Asian­American.pdf​
>. Lee, Stacey J. ​
Unraveling the "Model Minority" Stereotype Listening to Asian American Youth Second Edition. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2015. Kacius 13 <​
http://www.faculty.umb.edu/lawrence_blum/courses/CCT627_10/readings/lee_unraveling_mod
el_minority_stereotype.pdf​
>. Lin, Monica H., Virginia S. Y. Kwan, Anna Cheung, and Susan T. Fiske.Stereotype Content Model Explains Prejudice for an Envied Outgroup: Scale of Anti–Asian American Stereotypes. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2015. <​
https://psychology.clas.asu.edu/sites/default/files/SAAAS.pdf​
>. Lindqvist, Erik (2010) : Height and Leadership, IFN Working Paper, No. 835 Mastro, Dana E., and Elizabeth Behm­Morawitz. Latino Representation On Primetime Television. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2015. <​
http://cer2.missouri.edu/resources/behm­morawitz/Latinos_on_TV.pdf​
>. Maykovich, M. (1972). Reciprocity in racial stereotypes: White, Black, and Yellow. American Journal of Sociology, 77, 876­897. Neumark­Sztainer D, Story M, Harris T. Beliefs and attitudes about obesity among teachers and school health care providers working with adolescents. J Nutr Ed. 1999; 31: 3­9. Okeke, N. A., Howard, L. C., Kurtz­Costes, B., & Rowley, S. J. (2009). Academic race stereotypes, academic self­ concept, and racial centrality in African American youth. Journal of Black Psychology, 35, 366–387. doi:10. 1177/0095798409333615 Kacius 14 Persico, N., Postlewaite, A., and Silverman, D. (2004), “The Effect of Adolescent Experience on Labor Market Outcomes: The Case of Height.” Journal of Political Economy, 112 (October): 1019–53. Puhl R, Heuer C. The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity, 17, 941­964. Roehling MV. Weight­based discrimination in employment: psychological and legal aspects. Personnel Psychol. 1999; 52: 969­1017; Shapiro JR, King EB, Quinones MA. Expectations of obese trainees: how stigmatized trainee characteristics influence training effectiveness. J Appl Psychol. 2009;92(1):239­249. Steele, C.M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613­629 Tenenbaum, Harriet R., and Martin D. Ruck. Are Teacher's Expectations Different for Racial Minority Than for European American Students? A Meta­Analysis. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2015. <​
http://www.twotowns.org/Tenenbaum.pdf​
>. Valentino, Nicholas A., Vincent L. Hutchings, and Ismail K. White. Cues That Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes During Campaigns. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Mar. 2015. <​
http://polisci.osu.edu/sites/polisci.osu.edu/files/Valentino,%20Hutchings,%20White.pdf​
>. Kacius 15