Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Effectiveness of the Malleus to Oval Window Technique for Revision Stapedotomy 1 MD , 1 BS , Ling Zhou, Robert Peng, Darius Kohan, MD 1Department of Otolaryngology, NYU School of Medicine Abstract Objective: To determine the long-term effectiveness of the malleus to oval window technique for revision stapedotomy. Methods: The charts of 17 patients who underwent 19 revision stapedotomies performed between 2000 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The surgeries were performed under local anesthesia using a standard transcanal approach using a laser technique and the malleus to oval window prosthesis. Results: Among 19 stapedotomies performed, 11 were primary revisions, 7 were second revisions, and 1 was a third revision. The average preoperative air-bone gap was 29.0dB. The average postoperative air-bone gap was 9.3dB. Of the 11 primary revisions performed, 9/11 (81.8%) achieved ABG < 10dB. Of the secondary and tertiary revisions, 4/8 (50%) achieved ABG < 10dB. These results were comparable with previously reported revision stapes surgery techniques. The average length of follow up after revision stapedotomy was 31 months. There was no significant difference in air-bone gaps between the initial postoperative visit and the most recent visit (p=0.5). Methods and Materials Results The charts of 19 revision stapedotomies performed between 2000 and 2012 were reviewed. Demographic information, number of previous revision surgeries, and intraoperative findings were reviewed. Only patients who received a malleus to oval window prosthesis were included. Among 19 stapedotomies performed, 11 were primary revisions, 7 were second revisions, and 1 was a third revision. The surgeries were performed under local anesthesia using a standard transcanal approach. An Argon or potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser was used in all cases. Of the 11 primary revisions performed, 9/11 (81.8%) achieved ABG < 10dB. Of the secondary and tertiary revisions, 4/8 (50%) achieved ABG < 10dB. Despite a strong trend, there was no statistical difference between these groups (p=0.09) Auditory results conform to the guidelines provided by the American Academy of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery’s Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium. Air-bone Gaps (ABG) were reported as the difference between air and bone pure-tone averages (PTA) at frequencies of 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 Hz (and 4,000 Hz if the 3,000Hz was unavailable). Successful surgery was defined as closure of the ABG to within 10dB. Worsening of sensorineural hearing loss greater than 10 dB was considered a complication. When available, follow-up audiograms were examined to assess the durability of the revision. Conclusion: In experienced hands, revision stapedotomy using the malleus to oval window technique is both feasible and durable. Optimal revision stapes surgery results are difficult to achieve when there is erosion of the incus. This precludes the simple replacement or resizing of the incus to oval window piston. Options to address this problem include the use of a Lippy modified Robinson prosthesis, the Kurtz titanium prosthesis, reconstruction of the long process of the incus with bone cement, placement of a total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP), or the use of a malleus handle to oval window prosthesis. This study aims to examine a single surgeon’s 10 year experience with using the malleus to oval window technique for revision stapes surgery. The average length of follow up after revision stapedectomy was 31 months. There was no significant difference in air-bone gaps between the initial postoperative visit and the most recent visit (p=0.5). 15 patients had erosion of the incus, 6 categorized as mild and 9 categorized as severe. Prosthesis dislocation was observed in 11 patients. Significant fibrous adhesions were found in 8 patients and 4 obstructed the oval window. 2 patients had bony regrowth at the footplate. 1 patient had worsening of postop sensorineural hearing >10dB. Table 1 Introduction Since the Rosen’s description of stapes mobilization for otosclerosis in 1952, countless patients have undergone stapes surgery that successfully reversed their hearing loss. A minority of these patients require revision of their primary surgery, returning with complaints of increasing tinnitus, hearing loss , or vertigo. Major improvements to revision stapes surgery over the past three decades include the numerous prosthetic options developed to accommodate for the different anatomic variables encountered at surgery, and the use of lasers in lysing adhesions and bony overgrowth. By avoiding direct manipulation of delicate inner ear structures, laser ablation has helped lower the rate of sensorineural hearing loss and increase the rate of successful revision, defined as a narrowing of the air-bone gap to within 10dB with preservation of discrimination. The average preoperative air-bone gap was 29.0dB. The average postoperative air-bone gap was 9.3dB. Pt Age Sex 1 2 3 60 59 61 F F M 4 5 6 70 49 47 F F M Discussion Preop ABG Postop ABG % Closure Revision Type 28.75 43.25 40 7.5* 20 31.75 12.5 25.75 50 20 23.25 36.25 35 30 35 42.5 32.5 32 18.75 15 0 4 3.75 7.5 10 7.5 8.75 26.5 12.5 17 -1.25 16.25 8 0 6.25 13.75 7 6.25 47.8% 100.0% 90.0% 50.0% 62.5% 68.5% 40.0% 66.0% 47.0% 37.5% 26.9% 103.4% 53.6% 73.3% 100.0% 85.3% 57.7% 78.1% 66.7% Secondary Primary Secondary Secondary Primary Primary Secondary Secondary Secondary Primary Secondary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Tertiary Primary Primary 7 40 F 8 64 F 9 31 F 10 56 F 11 68 M 12 41 M 13 59 F 14 81 F 15 44 F 16 59 F 17 67 F Table 1 – Summary of demographics, preop, and postop audiologic findings. *Prosthesis extruding through TM; Pt elected to have revision surgery Contact References Ling Zhou MD Department of Otolaryngology, NYU School of Medicine Email: [email protected] 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Currently, there are no prospective randomized trials comparing outcomes amongst various revision stapes surgery techniques. Based on retrospective reviews, the expected success rate, with closure of the ABG to within 10dB is approximately 70-80% for primary revisions and 10% less for each subsequent revision in the laser era. (1-4) Erosion of the incus is also typically associated with poorer hearing outcomes. (5) Our results compare favorably with other reported series, having closed the ABG to within 10dB in 81.8% of primary revision and 50% of secondary/tertiary revisions despite the presence of incus erosion in nearly all of the reviewed cases. Additionally, at the average followup period of 31 months, there was no statistically significant deterioration of the ABG. One patient in our series experienced a postop SNHL worsening of 12dB. This is also in line with previously reported rates of SNHL ranging from 0.8-7%. (6-7) Conclusions With experience, revision stapedotomy using the malleus to oval window technique is both feasible and durable. Kohan, D. and A. Sorin (2003). "Revision stapes surgery: the malleus to oval window wire-piston technique." The Laryngoscope 113(9): 1520-1524. Han, W. W., A. Incesulu, et al. (1997). "Revision stapedectomy: intraoperative findings, results, and review of the literature." The Laryngoscope 107(9): 1185-1192. Jahnke, K., D. Solzbacher, et al. (2007). "Revision stapes surgery." Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology 65: 314-319. Lippy, W. H., R. A. Battista, et al. (2003). "Twenty-year review of revision stapedectomy." Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 24(4): 560-566. Ozuer, M. Z., L. Olgun, et al. (2012). "Revision stapes surgery." Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 146(1): 109-113. Hammerschlag, P. E., A. Fishman, et al. (1998). "A review of 308 cases of revision stapedectomy." The Laryngoscope 108(12): 1794-1800. Sheehy, J. L., R. A. Nelson, et al. (1981). "Revision stapedectomy: a review of 258 cases." The Laryngoscope 91(1): 43-51.