Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CV • Name • Positiom: • • • : Hindra Irawan Satari Chief, Infection Control Committee RSCM Chief, Infectious Diseases and Tropical Pediatrics , Child Health Dept FKUI-RSCM Member, Antimicrobal Resistance Watch Unit, RSCM • Education – General practitioner, FK UNPAD, 1981 – General Pediatrician, FKUI, 1992 – Master of Tropical Pediatrics, School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool University, United Kingdom, 1995 – Infectious and Tropical Pediatrics Consultant, Kolegium IDAI, 2002 – PhD in Medical Science, FKUI, 2012 • Course • Advance course in Hospital Infection, Hong Kong, 1994 Email: [email protected] AGENDA 0 Introduction 0 Definition surveillance 0 Surveillance HAIs in RSCM 0 Results of surveillance in RSCM 0 Root cause analysis of CLABSI in RSCM 0 Summary INTRODUCTION 0 Surveillance is generally recognized as essential to the practice of hospital infection control 0 Collection, analysis and dissemination of surveillance data to be the single most important factor in the prevention of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) DEFINITION 0 Ongoing, systematic, collection, analysis, interpret ation of health data essential to the planning, implementation, evaluation of infection control practices, closely integrated with timely dissemination of these data to whose who need to know 0 Surveillance is careful monitoring and relevant feedback SURVEILLANCE IN CIPTOMANGUNKUSUMO HOSPITAL (RSCM) 0 Goal 0 reducing infection rates 0 Objectives: 0 Identification of problem area and prioritising infection prevention and 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 control (IPC) activities Assisting the development of IPC policy and associated clinical practices Detecting changes in the endemicity of an HAI (e.g., MRSA) or an adverse event (e.g., needle stick injury in health-care works) Detecting changes in compliance with IPC policies (e.g, hand hygiene, timely removal of peripheral intravascular lines) Detecting outbreaks of adverse events (eg., food-borne illness) Establishing the effectiveness of an IPC interventions Identifying whether current programme meets benchmarks for IPC Establishing data for evidence-plan to improve care and, if required, to meet accreditation or regularly requirements. INFRASTRUCTURE FOR SURVEILLANCE IN RSCM 0 Documented Plan 0 Definition of HAIs infection: Basic concepts of infection control second edition, 2011 0 Population under surveillance: Entire facility 0 Identification of data source: The related unit 0 Selection of method for surveillance: Continuous 0 Distribution of reports and feedback: 0 Reports monthly 0 Feedback regular: Quarterly 0 Outbreak: as necessary 0 0 0 People 0 Fulltime IPCN 0 IPCN link Computers 0 Program: Excel Money another non-personal resources 0 Budget Committee SURVEILLANCE HAIs RSCM 0 Primary Bloodstream Infections (IADP) 0 Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) 0 Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ISK) 0 Surgical Site Infection (IDO) 0 Hospital-Associated Pneumonia (HAP) 0 Peripheral IV catheters (Phlebitis) 0 Decubitus ulcer (Dekubitus) 0 Hand-hygiene compliance 0 Sharp devices injury 0 Organisms isolated that are know to cause outbreaks HAIs INCIDENCE RATE RSCM, 2012 5,00 4,50 4,00 3,50 3,00 2,50 2,00 1,50 1,00 0,50 - 4,87 1,17 0,58 0,74 0,70 0,87 SURGICAL SITE INFECTION (IDO) RSCM, 2012 12,00 10,31 JUMLAH OPERASI/100 10,00 8,00 6,00 5,62 6,00 5,00 Bersih 5,00 Bersih Tercemar Tercemar 4,00 Kotor 2,50 2,50 5,00 0,24 0,00 0,31 0,24 0,33 0,50 0,53 Target<2% 2,54 1,67 2,00 0,71 0,53 0,02 0,93 0,71 0,21 0,09 CENTRAL LINE ASSOCIATED BLOOD STREAM INFECTION RSCM, 2012 Target<3.5‰ DEVICES DAYS / 1000 2,50 2,00 1,99 1,82 1,67 1,79 1,64 1,50 1,23 1,19 1,00 0,86 0,82 0,62 0,50 0,40 0,35 0,00 1 2 3 4 5 6 Month 7 8 9 10 11 12 CENTRAL LINE – ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTION DEPT/UPT/UNIT RSCM 2012 25,00 21,80 JML HARI PEMASANGAN CVL/1000 20,41 1 20,00 2 15,15 3 15,00 4 5 10,00 8,13 8,73 7,75 5,66 5,00 3,45 6 7 8 9 10 0,00 11 12 PERIPHERAL IV CATHETER RATE CIPTO MANGUNKUSUMO HOSPITAL, 2012 DEVICE DAYS / 1000 2,50 2,00 1,74 1,60 1,50 1,55 1,00 Target<1‰ 0,96 0,84 0,70 0,50 0,42 0,35 0,21 0,13 0,07 0,00 1 2 3 4 5 MONTH 6 7 8 0,01 9 10 11 12 DECUBITUS ULCER RATE RSCM, 2012 Jumlah hari pasien tirah baring/1000 Target<3‰ 2,50 2,23 2,00 2,00 1,50 1,42 1,41 1,27 1,00 0,92 1,24 0,84 0,71 0,50 0,36 0,13 0,00 1 2 3 4 5 0,11 6 MONTH 7 8 9 10 11 12 90% 80% HAND-HYGIENE COMPLIANCE RSCM,2012 82% 76% 70% 66% 69% 70% 78% 82% 71% 71% 70% 73% 70% 60% 50% 40% % Kepatuhan 30% 20% 10% 0% Target(> 85%) 0,35% SHARP DEVICES INJURIES RATE RSCM, 2012 0,30% 0,30% 0,30% 0,30% 0,25% 0,21% 0,20% 0,18% 0,18% 0,18% 0,15% 0,15% 0,15% 0,12% 0,10% 0,05% 0,00% 0,09% 0,06% BACTERIA AND SENSITIVITY PATTERN TO ANTIBIOTIC ANALYSIS 0 Total specimen increase 0 Shortage lab personel 0 Blood Culture results 0 Acinetobacter 0 K pneumonia 0 Pseudomonas 0 Panresisten significant increase 0 Signal MRSA SURVEILLANCE 0 Organisms isolated that is know to cause outbreaks 0 MRSA 0 2007 – 2012 increase 0 Most source specimen: 0 Building A level 6 and 7 0 Environment: 0 culture MRSA (-) 0 Summary source: 0 endogen 0 Recommendation: 0 Screening OUTBREAKS BSI - CLABSI 0March 2012 (NICU) 0 Enterobacter cloacae 0 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0August 2012 (PICU) 0 Burkholderia cepacia 0November 2012 (ICU Cardiology Center Unit ) 0 Burkholderia cepacia ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS 0 Step 1 AND 2 0 IDENTIFICATION INCIDEN AND TEAM BUILDING 0 STEP 3 0 DATA AND INFORMATION COLLECTING 0 STEP 4 0 MAPPING AND CHRONOLOGICAL FINDINGS 0 STEP 5 0 CARE MANAGEMENT PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION 0 STEP 6 0 INFORMATION ANALYSIS 0 RECOMMENDATION AND FOLLOW UP STEP 1 and 2 IDENTIFICATION TEAM INCIDENCE 0 Incidence: 0 Outbreak pseudomonas and enterobacter 0 Investigator Team 0 Hospital infection team 0 Sanitation unit 0 CSSD 0 Quality and control and patient safety committee 0 Dept Microbiology 0 Head nurse 0 Incidence type 0 Sentinel 0 Impact 0 HAIs increase 0 Score risk 0 Impact X probability: 5x4=20 0 Band risk 0 Red STEP 3 DATA AND INFORMATION COLLECTING 0 Written documentation 0 Medical record (Nurse notes, SOP, ward capacity) 0 Culture results 0 Nurse rotation schedule 0 Interview 0 MD 0 Head nurse 0 Nurses 0 Lab personal 0 Direct observation 0 Hand-hygiene compliance STEP 4 MAPPING CHRONOLOGICAL INCIDENT 0 Identity patient 0 Culture results 0 Health Care problem 0 Nurse and bed ratio STEP 5 CARE MANAGEMENT PROBLEM (CMP)IDENTIFICATION 0 Contamination source of water with Pseudomonas 0 Overload capacity 0 SCN 4 (12 babies with only 8 bed capacity) 0 Low nurse : bed ratio 0 Not met competency 0 Mixplacing patient elective surgery patient mixed with infectious babies 0 Over load due to the Government Policy 0 Compliance Hand-hygiene STEP 6 INFORMATION ANALYSIS 5 WHY 0 Water contamination : 0 source of water from EMG Dept 0 Overload: 0 government policy 0 Nurse capacity: 0 SCN level, 0 nurse bed ratio, 0 compliance Hand-Hygiene STEP 6 INFORMATION ANALYSIS 5 WHY 0 Government policy 0 Compliance Hand-Hygiene Health-Care Worker 0 not met procedure 0 Nurse Competency: 0 not related competency 0 Compliance Hand-Hygiene 0 low 0 Compliance of aseptic and invasive technique in the ward 0 low 0 New born management in delivery room 0 not met RECOMMENDATION AND FOLLOW UP 0 Advocation to MOH regarding Government Policy 0 Optimalization referral system 0 Renovation water supply 0 In-service training SUMMARY 0 Surveillance in RSCM detect changes patterns of HAI 0 Useful data to improve the quality care 0 Use to assess the performance of healthcare THANK YOU