Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Marburg virus disease wikipedia , lookup
Dirofilaria immitis wikipedia , lookup
Trichinosis wikipedia , lookup
Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae wikipedia , lookup
Schistosomiasis wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis C wikipedia , lookup
Sarcocystis wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis B wikipedia , lookup
Human cytomegalovirus wikipedia , lookup
Coccidioidomycosis wikipedia , lookup
Neonatal infection wikipedia , lookup
Treatment of Complicated and Uncomplicated Preauricular Pits Richard J. Vivero, MD; Soham Roy, MD, FACS, FAAP Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Miami, Florida, USA ABSTRACT DISCUSSION Objectives: 1. To review the University of Miami experience with complicated and uncomplicated preauricular pits 2. To review the relevant anatomy, embryology, and surgical technique. Methods: A retrospective chart review from 2002 to 2007 was conducted at a tertiary care university hospital to identify patients less than 18 years old undergoing surgical excision of a preauricular pit. Charts were reviewed for patient age, presentation, complications, treatment algorithm, and outcome. Results: 13 patients underwent surgical excision of a preauricular pit. The indication for excision was either recurrent infection or recurrent drainage in all cases. Three of 13 patients had a presurgical complication of the infection, including localized cellulitis of the preauricular skin or infection of the helical cartilage. These patients were treated with a prolonged course of antibiotics prior to surgical excision. All 13 patients were treated with wide surgical excision; in the 3 patients with pre-excision complications, careful attention was paid to meticulous incision of all involved tissue. There were no postoperative complications. No recurrences were noted up to 3 year follow-up. All patient’s parents were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome in all cases. Conclusion: Preauricular pits are an important entity due to their potential for significant infectious morbidity. Appropriate diagnosis and management with wide local excision, especially in the context of a complicated presentation, can result in excellent cosmesis with minimal risk of recurrence. Relevant embryology, anatomy, and surgical technique will be reviewed. INTRODUCTION Preauricular pits or sinuses are common congenital anomalies that predominantly affect children. When asymptomatic, they are often not a concern to the parent or child and largely ignored. However, when infected, they are profoundly bothersome to the child and prompt a visit to an Otolaryngologist for evaluation and treatment. In this review, we present the University of Miami experience of surgical management of preauricular pits, including a review of relevant embryology, anatomy, and surgical technique. Methods A retrospective chart review from 2002 to 2007 was conducted at a tertiary care university hospital to identify patients less than 18 years old undergoing surgical excision of a preauricular pit. Charts were reviewed for patient age, presentation, complications, treatment algorithm, and outcome. Results A total of 13 children underwent surgical excision of a preauricular pit. Age at the time of excision ranged from 2 years to 15 years (mean 8.75 years); 8 patients were female and 4 were male. Nine of 13 children had bilateral preauricular pits; asymptomatic contralateral pits with no prior history of infection or complications were not excised. Eight of the excised pits were from the right ear and 5 from the left. In all cases, the excised pit had a history of recurrent or chronic drainage, or a history of recurrent infection. Pits were all removed during a quiescent phase of infection; no surgical excision was performed during an active infection. In 3 of 13 cases the patient had a significant pre-excision infectious complication, including localized cellulitis of preauricular skin (figure 1) and infection of the helical cartilage (figure 2). In these patients, a two week course of antibiotic therapy was given prior to surgical excision to quiet the infectious process. Wide surgical excision was performed in all cases with careful attention to removing the entire tract of the preauricular pit in addition to any subcutaneous cyst that was identified. A lacrimal probe was used to follow the extension of any additional tract (figure 3). A shave excision of helical rim cartilage was performed when the tract extended to the helical root. In the 3 cases with infectious complications prior to surgery, all involved infected tissue was widely removed in addition to any identified cyst or sinus tract (figure 4). Primary closure was performed in all cases. The preauricular pit or sinus was first described in the German literature by Van Heusinger in 1864. It is a benign congenital malformation that affects the soft tissues anterior to the root of the helix. The incidence is noted to be 0.1-0.9% in the United States, 0.47% in Hungary, 0.9% in England, 2.5% in Taiwan, and 4-10% in some areas of Africa.1-3 For most patients, it is asymptomatic and not an issue of concern. However, a large subset of patients note a history of recurrent infections with discharge that are painful and bothersome requiring evaluation and treatment. Formation of the pit can be traced back to embryogenesis of the ear. The auricle arises from the first and second branchial arches during the sixth week of gestation. Each arch provides three mesenchymal proliferations, known as hillocks of His, which fuse to form the definitive auricle.1-4 Pit formation has been postulated to form by one of three theories. The most popular theory is the interbular theory that postulates sinuses form due to incomplete fusion of two of the six hillocks.14 Less popular but persisting theories of formation include incomplete closure of the dorsal part of the pharyngeal groove and isolated ectodermal folding during auricular development with resultant pit formation.2 Preauricular sinuses can be inherited or sporadic. The inherited form shows an incomplete autosomal dominant pattern with reduced penetrance (approximately 85%) and variable expression.1-3 Studies from China have mapped a possible locus for fistula formation to chromosome 8q11.1-q13.3.1 Sinuses can be either unilateral or bilateral with the latter more likely genetic.2 Of concern to the practicing Otolaryngologist is the exceedingly small risk of associated syndromes affecting the inner ear and kidneys. Branchio-oto-renal (BOR) syndrome is the most well known and consists of conductive, sensorineural, or mixed hearing loss; preauricular pits; structural defects of the outer, middle or inner ear; renal anomalies; lateral cervical fistula, cysts, or sinus; and nasolacrimal duct stenosis or fistula.1-4 The incidence of hearing impairment of all possible associated syndromes with preauricular pits in children has been estimated to be as high as 15-30%.3 In our experience, 9 of 13 patients (69%) had bilateral preauricular sinuses, which is suggestive of a genetic etiology. Unfortunately, however, our records did not have genealogic evidence to assess familial inheritance of this trait The typical presentation of a preauricular pit is an innocuous, asymptomatic cutaneous indentation anterior to the auricle. Specifically, the pit may be located at the anterior margin of the ascending helix.1 Anomalous openings in the posterosuperior margin of the helix, the tragus or lobule have been reported.1 Patients often present at times of infection when there are signs of erythema and drainage from the pit, which may be accompanied by constitutional symptoms. Preauricular sinuses may also result in subcutaneous cyst formation and are almost always associated with the perichondrium of the auricular cartilage.1-2,4 The sinus tract course is lateral and superior to the facial nerve and parotid gland unlike branchial cleft anomalies, which are closely related to these structures.1 Definitive management is achieved by complete excision of the preauricular pit and its sinus tract following resolution of infection. The sinus tract should be probed with a lacrimal probe or injected with methylene blue to ensure identification of all branches distal to the cutaneous pit.12,4-5 Some authors, including our group, advocate for the excision of a small cartilaginous cuff at the end of the sinus tract, as the sinus is intimately associated with the perichondrium of the auricle.1-2,4 The rate of recurrence ranges from 0 to 42% depending on the factors present at time of excision.1,4 Lower recurrence rates are noted for patients who are not actively infected at time of infection, who have the sinus probed at time of surgery, and who have a cuff of cartilage excised in unison with the sinus.1,4 Our process and experience is consistent with reports from the literature, and we have noted no recurrences at this time with follow-ups from 2 weeks to 3 years. None of the parents of our patients complained of the cosmetic outcome of the procedure suggesting a simple wide local excision with attention to meticulous closure is sufficient to obtain excellent cosmesis. Postoperatively, all patients were treated with a one week course of oral antibiotics. A rubber band drain was placed into the wound overnight and removed on postoperative day 1 if a cavity remained after excision large enough to be concerned about postoperative hematoma development. There were no postoperative complications in any of the cases. Follow-up time ranged from 2 weeks to 3 years; no recurrences or postoperative complications were reported. In all cases, parents were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome after surgical removal and no further intervention was required (figure 5). CONCLUSION Preauricular sinus or pits are often asymptomatic lesions associated with the anterior aspect of the auricle. The etiology is associated with auricular embryogenesis and can be either inherited or sporadic. Practicing otolaryngologists must be cognizant of associated syndromes, including brancho-oto-renal (BOR) syndrome. When Figure 4 preauricular pits are complicated by infection, treatment of the active infection followed by surgical resolution is the appropriate and definitive treatment. When the sinus is fully probed and a cuff of cartilage is resected at time of surgery, the rate of recurrence is low. Figure 1. Preauricular pit of right ear with localized infection complicated by cellulitis. Figure 2. Preauricular pit of left ear with localized infection complicated by helical cartilage involvement. REFERENCES [1] Tan T, Constantinides H, Mitchell TE. The preauricular sinus: A review of its aetiology, clinical presentation and management. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Nov;69(11):1469-74. [2] Scheinfeld NS, Silverberg NB, Weinberg JM, Nozad V. The preauricular sinus: a review of its clinical presentation, treatment, and associations. Pediatr Dermatol. 2004 May-Jun;21(3):191-6. [3] Huang XY, Tay GS, Wansaicheong GK, Low WK. Preauricular sinus: clinical course and associations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Jan;133(1):65-8. Figure 3. Example of sinus tract of left auricle cannulated with lacrimal probe to determine extent of involvement. Figure 4. Wide local excision of left preauricular pit with removal of all involved tissues (same patient as in Figure 2). Figure 5. Two-month posoperative photograph of left ear demonstrating excellent cosmesis. [4] Gur E, Yeung A, Al-Azzawi M, Thomson H. The excised preauricular sinus in 14 years of experience: is there a problem? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Oct;102(5):1405-8. [5] Coatesworth AP, Patmore H, Jose J. Management of an infected preauricular sinus, using a lacrimal probe. J Laryngol Otol. 2003 Dec;117(12):983-4. .