Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Journal of Immunology Captopril Prevents Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis1 Lisa M. Godsel,2* Juan S. Leon,2* Kegiang Wang,* Jamie L. Fornek,* Agostino Molteni,† and David M. Engman3* Captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, is widely used in the treatment of a variety of cardiomyopathies, but its effect on autoimmune myocarditis has not been addressed experimentally. We investigated the effect of captopril on myosininduced experimental autoimmune myocarditis. A/J mice, immunized with syngeneic cardiac myosin, were given 75 mg/L of captopril in their drinking water. Captopril dramatically reduced the incidence and severity of myocarditis, which was accompanied by a reduction in heart weight to body weight ratio and heart weight. Captopril specifically interfered with cell-mediated immunity as myosin delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) was reduced, while anti-myosin Ab production was not affected. Captopril-treated, OVA-immunized mice also exhibited a decrease in OVA DTH. In myosin-immunized, untreated mice, injection of captopril directly into the test site also suppressed myosin DTH. Interestingly, captopril did not directly affect Ag-specific T cell responsiveness because neither in vivo nor in vitro captopril treatment affected the proliferation, IFN-␥ secretion, or IL-2 secretion by Ag-stimulated cultured splenocytes. These results indicate that captopril ameliorates experimental autoimmune myocarditis and may act, at least in part, by interfering with the recruitment of cells to sites of inflammation and the local inflammatory environment. The Journal of Immunology, 2003, 171: 346 –352. M yocarditis, inflammation of the heart, is characterized by myocyte necrosis and degeneration with mononuclear cell infiltration in the presence or absence of fibrosis (1). In the U.S., ⬃2500 people develop myocarditis each year (2, 3), although the prevalence of this disease is probably underestimated (4, 5). Myocarditis may be caused by infections with bacteria, viruses, parasites, and fungi, as well as by drugs and toxins. Virally induced myocarditis is commonly caused by coxsackievirus infection in North America and Europe, and parasiteinduced myocarditis is commonly caused by Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Latin America (1, 3, 5–7). Treatments for myocarditis are directed toward reducing or eliminating the infectious agent and associated disease complications, such as congestive heart failure, cardiogenic shock, conduction abnormalities, dysrhythmias, and thromboembolism (8). These complications are typically treated with diuretics, digitalis,  blockers, and vasodilators, such as angiotensin II receptor antagonists and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)4 inhibitors (9). One commonly prescribed ACE inhibitor is captopril, which binds to ACE via its peptide-binding pocket and inhibits the functions of ACE, particularly the formation of angiotensin II from angiotensin I and the breakdown of bradykinin (10). Among the *Departments of Microbiology-Immunology and Pathology and The Feinberg Cardiovascular Research Institute, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611; and †Department of Pathology, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO 64110 Received for publication January 3, 2003. Accepted for publication April 17, 2003. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 1 This work was conducted with support from the National Institutes of Health and American Heart Association. 2 L.M.G. and J.S.L. contributed equally to this study. 3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. David M. Engman, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Ward 6-175, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail address: d-engman@ northwestern.edu 4 Abbreviations used in this paper: ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; DTH, delayed-type hypersensitivity; EAM, experimental autoimmune myocarditis. Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. many ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists, captopril has been shown to modulate chemotaxis, motility, adhesion, differentiation, activation, and cytokine and chemokine production of immune cells (reviewed in Ref. 11). Captopril is effective at ameliorating many human cardiomyopathies (12, 13), although its direct effect on human myocarditis has not been addressed. The drug decreases inflammation, calcification, and fibrosis in several models of infectious myocarditis, including encephalomyocarditis virus (14 –16), coxsackievirus B3 (17–19), and T. cruzi (20). However, the effect of captopril on experimental models of Ag-induced autoimmune myocarditis has not been addressed. An established model of experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) is induced in susceptible strains of mice upon immunization with the ␣ H chain of cardiac myosin (21). EAM is histologically similar to human myocarditis, with myocyte swelling and necrosis accompanied by mononuclear cell infiltration and fibrosis. Studies have shown that EAM is a T cell-mediated disease, requiring both CD4⫹ and CD8⫹ subsets (22–26). B cells are not vital for Ag presentation in EAM, and autoantibodies are not necessary for the progression of myocarditis (22, 27, 28). To study the effect of ACE inhibition on the development of autoimmune myocarditis, we administered captopril to A/J mice immunized with cardiac myosin. We found that captopril ameliorates myocarditis and decreases cell-mediated inflammatory responses found in EAM. These results demonstrate that captopril treatment is indeed an effective method for inhibiting autoimmune myocarditis, and although it decreases cell-mediated immune responses, it does not directly affect T cell function. Materials and Methods Experimental animals Male A/J mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) were 6 – 8 wk of age at initiation of the experiments. DO11.10 BALB/c mice were a gift from S. Miller (Northwestern University, Chicago, IL). Mice were anesthetized by a single i.p. injection of 60 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital for each experimental manipulation. The use and care of mice were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Center for Comparative Medicine at Northwestern University. 0022-1767/03/$02.00 The Journal of Immunology Preparation of myosin Cardiac myosin H chains were purified according to the method of Shiverick et al. (29), with modifications as described (30). Induction of autoimmune myocarditis Mice were immunized with myosin (300 g) in an emulsion of CFA (Difco, Detroit, MI) in a total volume of 0.1 ml. Mice received s.c. injections in three sites in the dorsal flank. Seven days later, mice were boosted in an identical manner. OVA immunization Mice were immunized with an emulsion of OVA (100, 75, 50, or 25 g; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in CFA in a total volume of 0.1 ml. Mice received s.c. injections in three sites in the dorsal flank. Seven days later, mice were boosted in an identical manner. Captopril treatment regimen Mice were given drinking water containing or lacking 75–100 g/ml captopril from the day of immunization through the day of sacrifice. We tested a variety of doses of captopril and chose for the actual experiment the highest dose that gave a decrease in myosin-induced myocarditis without mortality. Administration of captopril at concentrations greater than 120 g/ml in the water led to excessive mortality. The range of doses tested was chosen based on other reports (15, 31), with 2 mg/ml as the upper end dose (32). The amount of water consumed and the weights of the mice were monitored and the amount of captopril was adjusted so that the mice received ⬃25 mg captopril/kg body weight/day. Captopril stimulated water consumption in our mice, as reported (33), to 5–7 ml per mouse per day throughout the course of treatment. Serum ACE activity Serum ACE activity was determined by the spectrophotometric method of Cushman and Cheung (34) using the synthetic substrate hippuryl-L-histidyl-L-leucine. Serum was treated with HCl and ethyl acetate and dehydrated. Hippuryl-L-histidyl-L-leucine content was then determined using the biuret method utilizing BSA as a standard. ACE levels were expressed as milliunits per ml of serum. The increase in serum ACE correlates with the presence of captopril due to the deregulation of a negative feedback loop in the renin-angiotensin system. Histologic evaluation of disease Hearts were excised, fixed in 10% buffered Formalin, and embedded in paraffin. Four sections per heart were stained with H&E or Masson’s trichrome and examined by light microscopy. Masson’s trichrome was used to determine the extent of collagen deposition as an indicator of fibrosis. Each section was examined blinded for evidence of mononuclear and polynuclear cellular inflammation, necrosis and mineralization, and fibrosis, and was assigned a histologic score between 0 (no involvement noted) and 4 (100% involvement), with 1, 2, and 3 representing 25, 50, and 75% involvement of the histologic section. Independent blinded observers obtained substantial (0.60 – 0.79) to almost perfect (0.80 –1.00) agreement on their scoring by weighted statistic (35), as measured on a representative sample of 20 heart sections: overall agreement (0.82), inflammation (0.80), necrosis (0.96), and fibrosis (0.92). 347 lysed by hypotonic shock in Tris-NH4Cl (pH 7.3), and the cells were washed and resuspended in HBSS (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Cells were cultured in 96-well microtiter plates (Corning-Costar, Acton, MA) at 5 ⫻ 105 cells/well in DMEM containing 5 ⫻ 10⫺5 M 2-ME, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 g/ml streptomycin, 0.1 M nonessential amino acids, and 5% FCS (HyClone, Logan, UT) in the presence of 10 M OVA, 10 M myosin, or medium alone as a negative control, and anti-murine CD3 (500 ng/ml, 2C11 clone; a gift from W. Karpus, Northwestern University) as a positive control. Cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The cells were pulsed with 1 Ci of [3H]TdR (ICN Radiochemicals, Irvine, CA) after 72 h and harvested after 96 h, and [3H]TdR uptake was detected using a Topcount microplate scintillation counter (Packard Instruments, Meriden, CT). Results are presented as the mean ⫾ SEM of triplicate wells. Assessment of cytokine production was determined from lymph node culture supernatants harvested following 48-h stimulation with 10 M OVA, 10 M myosin, or medium alone as a negative control, and anti-CD3 as a positive control. The supernatants were tested for the presence of IL-2, IL-4, and IFN-␥ by commercial ELISA kits (Endogen, Cambridge, MA). The detection limit of the cytokine ELISA kits is as follows: IL-2, 15.6 pg/ml; IL-4, 31.3 pg/ml; and IFN-␥, 48.8 pg/ml. Statistical evaluation All values are expressed as mean ⫾ SEM. The statistical significance of DTH, T cell proliferations, cytokine levels, and Ab isotypes was analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by a two-tailed t test and post hoc Bonferroni analysis. The statistical significance of disease incidence and comparison of histologic scores were analyzed by Pearson’s 2. Agreement of blinded observer histopathology scores was analyzed by weighted . Mean histologic scores ⫾ SD, although statistically invalid, will be provided to aid the reader and to continue the convention of other autoimmune myocarditis papers. Values of p ⬍ 0.05 were considered significant. Results Captopril increases serum ACE levels To study the effect of captopril on autoimmune-mediated inflammation and fibrosis, we added captopril to the drinking water of myosin-immunized and saline-immunized A/J mice. Each captopril-treated mouse received 25 mg drug/kg body weight per day. We confirmed that the captopril treatment was effective by assaying for increased levels of ACE in treated mice at day 21 postimmunization. Increased ACE levels result from the captopril-induced negative feedback loop of the renin-angiotensin system in which a decrease of angiotensin II stimulates the production of ACE (34). Captopril-treated myosin and saline-immunized mice had significantly ( p ⬍ 0.001) higher levels of ACE than did untreated controls (Fig. 1). These results indicate that captopril was Measurement of Ag-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity Myosin- and OVA-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) was quantitated using a standard ear-swelling assay (30). Ag-induced ear swelling was the result of mononuclear cell infiltration and exhibited typical DTH kinetics (i.e., minimal swelling at 4 h, maximal swelling at 24 – 48 h postinjection). Serologic analysis Myosin- and OVA-specific ELISAs were used to analyze the levels and isotype specificities of the Ag-specific Abs, as described (36). Each serum sample was analyzed separately, and the data were compiled for each group. Each plate was also tested with sera from one particular mouse immunized with myosin/CFA, a second immunized with OVA/CFA, and a third immunized with saline/CFA as controls. In vitro T cell proliferation and cytokine assays Spleens were forced through 100-mesh stainless steel screens to yield single cell splenocyte suspensions. RBCs in the spleen preparations were FIGURE 1. Captopril up-regulates serum ACE levels in myosin-immunized mice. At 21 days postimmunization, sera were collected and analyzed for serum ACE levels from four groups of mice: myosin immunized and captopril treated (Myosin/CFA ⫹ Captopril), myosin immunized (Myosin/CFA), saline immunized and captopril treated (PBS/CFA ⫹ Captopril), and saline immunized (PBS/CFA). ⴱ, p ⬍ 0.001 compared with the respective untreated group. 348 CAPTOPRIL PREVENTS AUTOIMMUNE MYOCARDITIS Table II. Captopril treatment decreases inflammation, necrosis, and fibrosis in mice with experimental autoimmune myocarditis Scoresa All Mice Inflammation Necrosis Fibrosis Affected Mice Inflammation Necrosis FIGURE 2. Captopril prevents cardiac pathology in myosin-immunized mice. At 21 days postimmunization, hearts from the four groups described in Fig. 1 were analyzed grossly (Gross) and histopathologically by staining with H&E or Masson’s trichrome (Trichrome). Representative hearts and tissue sections are shown. Hearts from saline-immunized mice were indistinguishable from hearts from saline-immunized, captopril-treated mice (PBS/CFA ⫹ Captopril). effective in blocking the production of angiotensin II by inhibiting ACE in treated mice. Increasing the captopril dose or prolonging captopril treatment resulted in elevated serum ACE levels (37–39). Captopril reduces cardiac hypertrophy in myosin-immunized mice Twenty-one days postimmunization, gross analysis of the hearts of captopril-treated mice revealed a significant decrease in the typical signs of myocarditis: hypertrophy, induration, and pallor. Captopril-treated, myosin-immunized mice resembled saline-immunized mice (Fig. 2). Hypertrophy was reduced in treated mice, as evidenced by body weight and heart weight measurements (Table I). Captopril significantly reduced the heart weight, body weight, and heart weight to body weight ratios in myosin-immunized mice. Interestingly, both the heart weight and the heart weight to body weight ratios of myosin-immunized, captopril-treated mice were equivalent to those of saline-immunized mice. Captopril did not significantly affect the heart weight or heart weight to body weight ratio in saline-immunized mice, suggesting that the reduction of these parameters in myosin-immunized, captopril-treated mice was due to reduction in hypertrophy. Captopril ameliorates myocarditis in myosin-immunized mice To investigate whether the reduction of hypertrophy reflected a lack of tissue inflammation, we performed histopathologic analysis of hearts excised from myosin- and saline-immunized mice 21 days postimmunization. Captopril significantly reduced the incidence (Table I) and severity (Fig. 2, Table II) of myocarditis in Fibrosis Captopril 0 1 2 3 4 Total Severity ⫹* ⫺ ⫹** ⫺ ⫹** ⫺ 22 12 25 14 24 11 5 8 3 10 3 11 1 7 0 5 1 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 29 28 29 28 29 0.3 ⫾ 0.5 1.0 ⫾ 1.0 0.1 ⫾ 0.3 0.7 ⫾ 0.8 0.2 ⫾ 0.5 0.9 ⫾ 0.8 0 2 3 4 2 1 5 8 3 10 3 11 1 7 0 5 1 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 19 6 19 6 19 1.2 ⫾ 0.4 1.5 ⫾ 0.8 0.5 ⫾ 0.5 1.1 ⫾ 0.7 0.8 ⫾ 0.8 1.3 ⫾ 0.6 ⫹ ⫺ ⫹ ⫺ ⫹ ⫺ a Histologic scores were assigned by blinded observers and ranged from 0 (no involvement noted) to 4 (100% involvement), with 1, 2, and 3 representing 25, 50, and 75% involvement of the histologic section. The number of mice and the percentage of mice in the group receiving that score are given. Mice injected with saline (n ⫽ 8) or mice injected with saline and treated with captopril (n ⫽ 10) received scores of 0 for all parameters. The severity score is presented as the average ⫾ SD. ⴱ, p ⬍ 0.05 compared with untreated myosin-immunized mice. ⴱⴱ, p ⬍ 0.01 compared with untreated myosin-immunized mice. myosin-immunized mice. Specifically, captopril reduced inflammation, fibrosis, and necrosis in these animals. Restricting the analysis to only diseased hearts showed that disease severity in affected mice was reduced, although not to a statistically significant level (Table II). Captopril reduces Ag-specific DTH We hypothesized that the reduction in cardiac inflammation in captopril-treated, myosin-immunized mice was due to an effect on myosin-specific immunity, which mediates cardiac inflammation in these mice (36). We assayed myosin-specific cellular immunity and found that captopril significantly reduced myosin DTH in myosin-immunized mice (Fig. 3a). These results suggest that captopril affects T cell-mediated inflammation in vivo, explaining the reduction of inflammation and damage observed in hearts of the captopril-treated, myosin-immunized mice. To determine whether the reduction of DTH by captopril was due to a suppression of T cell responses and not due to a reflection of captopril’s cardioprotective role (i.e., less myocardial damage results in decreased myosin autoimmune response (21)), we assayed OVA DTH in OVAimmunized mice treated with captopril. Captopril significantly reduced OVA DTH in OVA-immunized mice (Fig. 3c). These results suggest that captopril can reduce inflammatory responses to both a self and foreign Ag, irrespective of myocardial damage. Captopril has been shown to reduce local inflammatory processes Table I. Captopril treatment decreases disease incidence, heart weight, and heart weight to body weight ratio in mice with experimental autoimmune myocarditis Group Myosin/CFA ⫹ Captopril Myosin/CFA PBS/CFA ⫹ Captopril PBS/CFA ⴱ, p ⫽ 0.001 compared with myosin/CFA. ⴱⴱ, p ⬍ 0.05 compared with myosin/CFA. ⴱⴱⴱ, p ⬍ 0.05 compared with PBS/CFA. Disease Incidence 6/30 (20%)* 21/33 (64%) 0/11 0/10 Heart Weight (g) Body Weight (g) Heart Weight to Body Weight Ratio 0.087 ⫾ 0.016** 0.110 ⫾ 0.023*** 0.084 ⫾ 0.008 0.095 ⫾ 0.011 21.1 ⫾ 1.76** 22.8 ⫾ 2.49 21.0 ⫾ 2.22 22.8 ⫾ 1.88 3.97 ⫻ 10⫺3 ⫾ 1.03 ⫻ 10⫺4** 4.83 ⫻ 10⫺3 ⫾ 1.65 ⫻ 10⫺4*** 4.03 ⫻ 10⫺3 ⫾ 2.95 ⫻ 10⫺4 4.15 ⫻ 10⫺3 ⫾ 2.86 ⫻ 10⫺4 The Journal of Immunology 349 icantly affected by captopril treatment (Fig. 4), suggesting that captopril does not affect humoral immunity in our model system. Ag-specific T cell proliferation and cytokine secretion are not affected in vivo or in vitro by captopril administration To determine whether the in vivo effects of captopril or Ag-specific cellular immunity are due to direct effects on T cell function, we measured the effect of captopril treatment in vitro on the Agspecific stimulation of splenocytes derived from DO11.10 TCR transgenic mice in which the majority of T lymphocytes are specific for OVA. Splenocytes from untreated DO11.10 cultured with OVA exhibited strong proliferation and cytokine secretion in the presence or absence of captopril in the culture medium (Fig. 5). Splenocytes did not respond to myosin, a negative control. This prompted us to test splenocytes from captopril-treated OVA-immunized BALB/c mice. Splenocytes from mice receiving captopril for 21 days showed normal in vitro proliferation and cytokine secretion when stimulated by OVA or anti-CD3 (Fig. 6). These results suggest that captopril does not directly affect Ag-specific T cell responses. Discussion FIGURE 3. Captopril treatment inhibits DTH responses. A, Twenty-one days postimmunization, myosin-specific DTH was measured in 10 mice from the four groups described in Fig. 1 by a 24-h ear-swelling assay, as described in Materials and Methods. ⴱ, p ⬍ 0.001 compared with the myosin/CFA group. B, Twenty days postimmunization, untreated, myosinimmunized mice received ear injections of myosin plus 1 ⫻ 10⫺4 M captopril (Myosin/CFA ⫹ Captopril) or myosin alone (Myosin/CFA). Salineimmunized mice received ear injections of myosin plus 1 ⫻ 10⫺4 M captopril (PBS/CFA ⫹ Captopril) or myosin alone (PBS/CFA). Myosinspecific DTH was measured the following day, and bars represent the mean swelling of five mice per group. ⴱ, p ⬍ 0.01 compared with the myosin/ CFA group. C, Eight mice per group were immunized and boosted with the indicated amounts of OVA (OVA/CFA) or saline (PBS/CFA). Four mice in each group received captopril (Captopril) or nothing (No Treatment) in their water. Twenty-one days postimmunization, OVA-specific DTH was measured in four mice from each group. ⴱ, p ⬍ 0.005. Error bars represent SEM. Captopril ameliorated autoimmune myocarditis, as evidenced by a reduction in cardiac hypertrophy and the incidence and severity of inflammation, necrosis, and fibrosis. Captopril also reduced in vivo cell-mediated inflammatory responses, as measured by a reduction of myosin- and OVA-specific DTH in Ag-immunized mice. This reduction in cell-mediated immunity by captopril was not due to a direct effect on T cells because these cells proliferated normally and secreted normal amounts of proinflammatory cytokines when necessary for the induction of DTH responses, including: deposition of extravasated fibrin (17), production of proinflammatory cytokines (40 – 42), recruitment of leukocytes (43, 44), and regulation of the renin-angiotensin system in dendritic cell function (45). Therefore, we tested whether captopril could suppress DTH locally or required systemic administration. In myosin-immunized, untreated mice, local injection of captopril into the DTH site also significantly decreased myosin DTH compared with controls (Fig. 3b). These results indicate that captopril can act locally to mediate its effects and that its reduction of DTH may be due to a direct effect on T cell function, trafficking of T cells, or a generalized suppression of the inflammatory environment. Captopril does not affect Ag-specific Ab production Prevention of myocarditis in myosin-immunized mice by restoring peripheral T cell tolerance to myosin is associated with a decrease in myosin-specific Ab production (36). Moreover, other studies suggest that captopril decreases bulk Ab levels (46, 47). We investigated whether captopril treatment affected humoral responses to myosin and OVA at day 21 postimmunization, and found that myosin-specific and OVA-specific Ab production was not signif- FIGURE 4. Captopril does not affect myosin-specific or OVA-specific Ab production. A, At 21 days postimmunization, sera from mice in the four groups described in Fig. 1 were analyzed by myosin-specific ELISA using isotype-specific secondary Abs. Bars represent the averages of 10 mice. B, At 21 days postimmunization, serum was collected and analyzed by OVAspecific ELISA using isotype-specific detecting Abs from four groups of mice: OVA immunized and captopril treated (OVA/CFA ⫹ Captopril), OVA immunized (OVA/CFA), saline immunized and captopril treated (PBS/CFA ⫹ Captopril), and saline immunized (PBS/CFA). Bars represent the mean OD450 of 10 samples. Error bars represent SEM. 350 FIGURE 5. In vitro captopril administration does not affect Ag-specific T cell proliferation or cytokine secretion. Splenocytes from untreated DO11.10 mice were cultured with 10 M OVA or 10 M myosin (Myosin), as a negative control, in the presence of varying concentrations of captopril. A, Proliferative responses were measured by [3H]TdR incorporation and represented as the mean of triplicate wells. B, Culture supernatants were assayed for the presence of IL-2 or IFN-␥ secreted by splenocytes cultured with 10 M OVA or 10 M myosin. Splenocytes were pooled from at least five mice. Symbols represent the mean of triplicate wells. Error bars represent SEM. removed from the animal and tested in vitro even when captopril was present in the culture medium. Interestingly, myosin- and OVA-specific Ab responses were not affected by captopril. Our finding that captopril inhibits the development of experimental autoimmune myocarditis is supported by several studies showing the beneficial effects of captopril on human cardiomyopathies (12, 13), infection-induced experimental myocarditides (14 –20), and experimental autoimmune disease models (48, 49). In addition, another ACE inhibitor, temocapril, reduces myosininduced myocarditis in rats via redox regulation mechanisms involving thioredoxin, although the effect of this agent on the immune system is not known (50). Our data on the reduction of DTH responses by captopril are novel and are supportive of the drug’s role in suppressing inflammatory processes (reviewed in Ref. 11). Captopril reduced both heart weight and heart weight to body weight ratio almost to normal, as is true of other disease models (14 –19, 51). This reduction is due to a decreased inflammation, myocyte necrosis, and consequent reparative fibrosis (Table II). Our data also indicate that captopril completely prevents myocarditis in some mice and reduces disease severity in those mice that CAPTOPRIL PREVENTS AUTOIMMUNE MYOCARDITIS FIGURE 6. In vivo captopril administration does not affect Ag-specific T cell proliferation or cytokine secretion by splenocytes of OVA-immunized mice. At 21 days postimmunization, splenocytes were prepared and cultured with 10 M OVA, 10 M myosin (Myosin) as a negative control, or anti-CD3 (anti-CD3) as a positive control, from four groups of mice: OVA immunized and captopril treated (OVA/CFA ⫹ Captopril), OVA immunized (OVA/CFA), saline immunized and captopril treated (PBS/ CFA ⫹ Captopril), and saline immunized (PBS/CFA). Captopril was administered to mice from day of immunization to day of sacrifice. Splenocytes were pooled from at least five mice in each group and did not receive captopril in the culture medium. A, Proliferative responses were measured by [3H]TdR incorporation and represented as the mean of triplicate wells. B, Culture supernatants were assayed for the presence of IFN-␥ and IL-2 and represented as the mean of triplicate wells. Error bars represent SEM. did develop some disease (Table II). Although the reduction in disease severity in affected mice does not reach statistical significance, it may still be of clinical significance. We are currently addressing whether treatment of captopril at later times postdisease induction also reduces myocarditis, as is true of mice infected with coxsackievirus B3 (17, 18). The precise mechanism by which captopril reduces autoimmune myocarditis remains to be determined. We initially hypothesized that captopril functions by inhibiting myosin-specific T cell responses. Although we found that captopril decreased myosin DTH in myosin-immunized mice (Fig. 3), we also found that captopril could work locally by reducing myosin DTH when injected into the DTH test site. In addition, the reduction in myosin DTH is not due to the cardioprotective role of captopril (less damage leading to decreased autoimmune response (21)), because captopril also reduced OVA DTH in OVA-immunized mice. These results suggest that captopril may suppress cell-mediated immunity against a self or foreign Ag irrespective of the presence of myocardial damage. We wondered whether the reduction in DTH induced by captopril was due to suppression of T cell function, as reported by other groups (42, 49). Instead, we found that captopril, whether administered in vitro or in vivo, had no effect on the proliferative capacity or cytokine secretion of splenocytes stimulated by Ag or by anti-CD3 (Fig. 5). Our results are in accordance with those showing that proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines secreted by human PBMCs are not affected by captopril administration (52). These results are also counter to those of other groups The Journal of Immunology reporting that captopril enhances T cell function in their model systems (53–56). The main difference between our results and those of the other groups is that we tested the effect of captopril on Ag-specific T cell proliferation and cytokine secretion, while other groups addressed this question in an Ag-nonspecific manner (e.g., by Con A, LPS, and PHA responses, among others). We do not yet know the mechanism by which captopril affects T cell responsiveness in vivo. Some groups have suggested that differences in these effects could be due to duration of captopril exposure (57), dosage (52–54, 58), in vitro vs in vivo administration (54), and plasma levels of PGs and bradykinin (56, 59), among other possibilities. We are currently addressing these hypotheses in our model system. If captopril does not directly affect T cell function, captopril may reduce inflammation and DTH by reducing recruitment of T cells to the site of antigenic stimulation or by altering the local inflammatory environment. These hypotheses are supported by our result that local injection of captopril into the DTH site reduced DTH. We are currently testing both hypotheses. Captopril has been shown to inhibit lymphocyte recruitment by decreasing chemotaxis in capillary endothelial cells (43) and neutrophils (44). The effects of captopril on chemokines have not been addressed, but there is mounting evidence that angiotensin II affects the activities of a number of chemokines, including RANTES (CCL-5), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (CCL-2), and macrophage-inflammatory protein 1-␣ (CCL-3) (reviewed in Ref. 11). Captopril also reduces local inflammatory processes necessary for the induction of DTH responses, including: deposition of extravasated fibrin (17); production of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-␣ (40, 41), IFN-␥ (42), and IL-12 (42); and dendritic cell function (45). Taken together, these results show that captopril significantly reduces experimental autoimmune myocarditis. Additional mechanisms of action of captopril could involve suppression of angiotensin II levels, enhancement of bradykinin levels, or a pharmacologic effect of captopril’s thiol group, among other mechanisms. Antagonists of angiotensin II receptors reduced encephalomyocarditis virus-induced myocarditis (16, 51, 60). Increased bradykinin levels and activation of NO and PGs by ACE inhibitors have been implicated in providing cardiac protection via reduction of infarct size (61), reduction of hypertrophy (62), and reduction of collagen gene expression (63). The cardioprotective effect may also be due to up-regulation of bradykinin, leading to NO synthesis (63, 64), which is most likely an important molecule in autoimmune myocarditis (65). Finally, the thiol group of captopril is thought to ameliorate encephalomyocarditis virus-induced myocarditis by elimination of oxygen radicals (14). In conclusion, captopril ameliorates autoimmune myocarditis, as shown by its reduction of cardiac hypertrophy, inflammation, necrosis, and fibrosis. Our data suggest that captopril reduces inflammation by decreasing cell-mediated immunity, without a direct effect on T cells, but not by affecting humoral immunity. These results have direct clinical import because patients suffering from autoimmune myocarditis would benefit from captopril. Future work from our laboratory will address the mechanisms of action of captopril in decreasing inflammation, so as to increase the specificity of treatment. Acknowledgments We thank Dr. William Ward for the kind gift of captopril, and Joann Taylor-Hinz for technical expertise in performing the ACE activity assay. We thank Dr. Alfred Rademaker (Center for Preventative Medicine, Northwestern University) for advice on statistical analysis, and Drs. Stephen Miller, William Karpus, and Carl Waltenbaugh for reagents and advice. 351 References 1. Pisani, B., D. O. Taylor, and J. W. Mason. 1997. Inflammatory myocardial diseases and cardiomyopathies. Am. J. Med. 102:459. 2. Jacobson, D. L., S. J. Gange, N. R. Rose, and N. M. Graham. 1997. Epidemiology and estimated population burden of selected autoimmune diseases in the United States. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 84:223. 3. Feldman, A. M., and D. McNamara. 2000. Myocarditis. N. Engl. J. Med. 343: 1388. 4. Kuhl, U., and H. P. Schultheiss. 1995. Treatment of chronic myocarditis with corticosteroids. Eur. Heart J. 16(Suppl. 0):168. 5. Caforio, A. L., and W. J. McKenna. 1996. Recognition and optimum management of myocarditis. Drugs 52:515. 6. Anandasabapathy, S., and W. H. Frishman. 1998. Innovative drug treatments for viral and autoimmune myocarditis. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 38:295. 7. Rossi, M. A., and R. B. Bestetti. 1995. The challenge of chagasic cardiomyopathy: the pathologic roles of autonomic abnormalities, autoimmune mechanisms and microvascular changes, and therapeutic implications. Cardiology 86:1. 8. Wenger, N. K., W. H. Abelmann, and W. C. Roberts. 1990. Myocarditis. In The Heart. J. W. Hurst and R. C. Schlant, eds. McGraw Hill, New York, p. 1256. 9. Dec, G. W., and R. W. DeSanctis. 1998. Cardiomyopathies. In Scientific American Medicine. D. C. Dale and D. D. Federman, eds. Scientific American Inc., New York, p 1. 10. Migdalof, B. H., M. J. Antonaccio, D. N. McKinstry, S. M. Singhvi, S. J. Lan, P. Egli, and K. J. Kripalani. 1984. Captopril: pharmacology, metabolism and disposition. Drug Metab. Rev. 15:841. 11. Godsel, L. M., J. S. Leon, and D. M. Engman. 2003. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists in experimental myocarditis. Curr. Pharm. Des. 9:723. 12. Plosker, G. L., and D. McTavish. 1995. Captopril: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy after myocardial infarction and in ischaemic heart disease. Drugs Aging 7:226. 13. Di Bianco, R. 1987. Captopril in the treatment of congestive heart failure. Herz 12(Suppl. 1):27. 14. Suzuki, H., A. Matsumori, Y. Matoba, B. S. Kyu, A. Tanaka, J. Fujita, and S. Sasayama. 1993. Enhanced expression of superoxide dismutase messenger RNA in viral myocarditis: an SH-dependent reduction of its expression and myocardial injury. J. Clin. Invest. 91:2727. 15. Kanda, T., M. Araki, M. Nakano, S. Imai, T. Suzuki, K. Murata, and I. Kobayashi. 1995. Chronic effect of losartan in a murine model of dilated cardiomyopathy: comparison with captopril. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 273:955. 16. Araki, M., T. Kanda, S. Imai, T. Suzuki, K. Murata, and I. Kobayashi. 1995. Comparative effects of losartan, captopril, and enalapril on murine acute myocarditis due to encephalomyocarditis virus. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 26:61. 17. Takada, H., C. Kishimoto, Y. Hiraoka, M. Kurokawa, K. Shiraki, and S. Sasayama. 1997. Captopril suppresses interstitial fibrin deposition in coxsackievirus B3 myocarditis. Am. J. Physiol. 272:H211. 18. Rezkalla, S., R. A. Kloner, G. Khatib, and R. Khatib. 1990. Beneficial effects of captopril in acute coxsackievirus B3 murine myocarditis. Circulation 81:1039. 19. Rezkalla, S., R. A. Kloner, G. Khatib, and R. Khatib. 1990. Effect of delayed captopril therapy on left ventricular mass and myonecrosis during acute coxsackievirus murine myocarditis. Am. Heart J. 120:1377. 20. Leon, J. S., K. Wang, and D. M. Engman. 2003. Captopril ameliorates myocarditis in acute experimental Chagas disease. Circulation 107:2264. 21. Neu, N., N. R. Rose, K. W. Beisel, A. Herskowitz, G. Gurri-Glass, and S. W. Craig. 1987. Cardiac myosin induces myocarditis in genetically predisposed mice. J. Immunol. 139:3630. 22. Smith, S. C., and P. M. Allen. 1991. Myosin-induced acute myocarditis is a T cell-mediated disease. J. Immunol. 147:2141. 23. Smith, S. C., and P. M. Allen. 1993. The role of T cells in myosin-induced autoimmune myocarditis. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 68:100. 24. Bachmaier, K., C. Pummerer, A. Shahinian, J. Ionescu, N. Neu, T. W. Mak, and J. M. Penninger. 1996. Induction of autoimmunity in the absence of CD28 costimulation. J. Immunol. 157:1752. 25. Neu, N., C. Pummerer, T. Rieker, and P. Berger. 1993. T cells in cardiac myosininduced myocarditis. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 68:107. 26. Penninger, J. M., N. Neu, E. Timms, V. A. Wallace, D. R. Koh, K. Kishihara, C. Pummerer, and T. W. Mak. 1993. The induction of experimental autoimmune myocarditis in mice lacking CD4 or CD8 molecules. J. Exp. Med. 178:1837. 27. Malkiel, S., S. Factor, and B. Diamond. 1999. Autoimmune myocarditis does not require B cells for antigen presentation. J. Immunol. 163:5265. 28. Neu, N., B. Ploier, and C. Ofner. 1990. Cardiac myosin-induced myocarditis: heart autoantibodies are not involved in the induction of the disease. J. Immunol. 145:4094. 29. Shiverick, K. T., L. L. Thomas, and N. R. Alpert. 1975. Purification of cardiac myosin: application to hypertrophied myocardium. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 393: 124. 30. Leon, J. S., L. M. Godsel, K. Wang, and D. M. Engman. 2001. Cardiac myosin autoimmunity in acute Chagas heart disease. Infect. Immun. 69:5643. 31. De Cavanagh, E. M., C. G. Fraga, L. Ferder, and F. Inserra. 1997. Enalapril and captopril enhance antioxidant defenses in mouse tissues. Am. J. Physiol. 272: R514. 32. Reyes, M. P., R. Khatib, G. Khatib, K. L. Ho, F. Smith, and R. A. Kloner. 1998. Prolonged captopril therapy in murine viral myocarditis. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. Therapeutics 3:43. 33. Weisinger, R. S., J. R. Blair-West, D. A. Denton, M. McBurnie, F. Ong, E. Tarjan, and R. M. Williams. 1990. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on salt appetite and thirst of BALB/c mice. Am. J. Physiol. 259:R736. 352 34. Cushman, D. W., and H. S. Cheung. 1971. Spectrophotometric assay and properties of the angiotensin-converting enzyme of rabbit lung. Biochem. Pharmacol. 20:1637. 35. Landis, J. R., and G. G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159. 36. Godsel, L. M., K. Wang, B. A. Schodin, J. S. Leon, S. D. Miller, and D. M. Engman. 2001. Prevention of autoimmune myocarditis through the induction of antigen-specific peripheral immune tolerance. Circulation 103:1709. 37. Ottlecz, A., and T. Bensaoula. 1996. Captopril ameliorates the decreased Na⫹, K⫹-ATPase activity in the retina of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 37:1633. 38. Boomsma, F., J. H. de Bruyn, F. H. Derkx, and M. A. Schalekamp. 1981. Opposite effects of captopril on angiotensin I-converting enzyme ‘activity’ and ‘concentration’; relation between enzyme inhibition and long-term blood pressure response. Clin. Sci. 60:491. 39. Chen, H., D. Mohuczy, D. Li, B. Kimura, M. I. Phillips, P. Mehta, and J. L. Mehta. 2001. Protection against ischemia/reperfusion injury and myocardial dysfunction by antisense-oligodeoxynucleotide directed at angiotensin-converting enzyme mRNA. Gene Ther. 8:804. 40. Zhao, S. P., and X. M. Xie. 2001. Captopril inhibits the production of tumor necrosis factor-␣ by human mononuclear cells in patients with congestive heart failure. Clin. Chim. Acta 304:85. 41. Fukuzawa, M., J. Satoh, M. Sagara, G. Muto, Y. Muto, S. Nishimura, S. Miyaguchi, X. L. Qiang, Y. Sakata, T. Nakazawa, et al. 1997. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors suppress production of tumor necrosis factor-␣ in vitro and in vivo. Immunopharmacology 36:49. 42. Constantinescu, C. S., D. B. Goodman, and E. S. Ventura. 1998. Captopril and lisinopril suppress production of interleukin-12 by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Immunol. Lett. 62:25. 43. Volpert, O. V., W. F. Ward, M. W. Lingen, L. Chesler, D. B. Solt, M. D. Johnson, A. Molteni, P. J. Polverini, and N. P. Bouck. 1996. Captopril inhibits angiogenesis and slows the growth of experimental tumors in rats. J. Clin. Invest. 98:671. 44. Clapperton, M., J. McMurray, A. C. Fisher, and H. J. Dargie. 1994. The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on human neutrophil chemotaxis in vitro. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 38:53. 45. Lapteva, N., K. Ide, M. Nieda, Y. Ando, Y. Hatta-Ohashi, M. Minami, G. Dymshits, K. Egawa, T. Juji, and K. Tokunaga. 2002. Activation and suppression of renin-angiotensin system in human dendritic cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 296:194. 46. Delfraissy, J. F., P. Galanaud, J. F. Balavoine, C. Wallon, and J. Dormont. 1984. Captopril and immune regulation. Kidney Int. 25:925. 47. Tarkowski, A., H. Carlsten, H. Herlitz, and G. Westberg. 1990. Differential effects of captopril and enalapril, two angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, on immune reactivity in experimental lupus disease. Agents Actions 31:96. 48. Herlitz, H., C. Svalander, A. Tarkowski, and G. Westberg. 1988. Effect of captopril on murine systemic lupus erythematosus disease. J. Hypertens. Suppl. 6:S684. CAPTOPRIL PREVENTS AUTOIMMUNE MYOCARDITIS 49. Constantinescu, C. S., E. Ventura, B. Hilliard, and A. Rostami. 1995. Effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor captopril on experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 17:471. 50. Yuan, Z., C. Kishimoto, K. Shioji, H. Nakamura, J. Yodoi, and S. Sasayama. 2002. Temocapril treatment ameliorates autoimmune myocarditis associated with enhanced cardiomyocyte thioredoxin expression. Cardiovasc. Res. 55:320. 51. Baba, T., T. Kanda, and I. Kobayashi. 2000. Reduction of cardiac endothelin-1 by angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist in viral myocarditis of mice. Life Sci. 67:587. 52. Peeters, A. C., M. G. Netea, B. J. Kullberg, T. Thien, and J. W. van der Meer. 1998. The effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on pro- and antiinflammatory cytokine production. Immunology 94:376. 53. Simon, M. R., J. V. Weinstock, R. M. Morrell, L. D. Roi, and L. M. Howard. 1984. Captopril enhances in vitro human lymphocyte thymidine incorporation. Agents Actions 15:525. 54. Binderup, L., E. Bramm, and E. Arrigoni-Martelli. 1982. Captopril(SQ 14, 225): in vitro and in vivo influence on the proliferative response of rat lymphocytes. Experientia 38:399. 55. Yeung, J. H. 1994. A comparison of the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with bradykinin, angiotensin II and their specific antagonists on concanavalin A-induced proliferation of mouse T-lymphocytes. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 16:163. 56. Johnsen, S. A., I. B. Persson, and M. Aurell. 1997. PGE2 production after angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 31:81. 57. Shasha, S. M., D. Nusam, L. Labin, B. Kristal, O. Steinberger, M. Barzilai, E. U. Makov, and T. Shkolnik. 1991. Effect of converting enzyme inhibitor captopril on T cell functions in essential hypertension. Nephron 59:586. 58. Oben, J. A., G. R. Wallace, B. M. Chain, and J. C. Foreman. 1989. The stimulation of IL-2 production by anti-rheumatic drugs. Immunology 67:328. 59. Johnsen, S. A., and M. Aurell. 1981. Immunosuppressive action of captopril blocked by prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor. Lancet 1:1005. 60. Tanaka, A., A. Matsumori, W. Wang, and S. Sasayama. 1994. An angiotensin II receptor antagonist reduces myocardial damage in an animal model of myocarditis. Circulation 90:2051. 61. Stauss, H. M., Y. C. Zhu, T. Redlich, D. Adamiak, A. Mott, K. C. Kregel, and T. Unger. 1994. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in infarct-induced heart failure in rats: bradykinin versus angiotensin II. J. Cardiovasc. Risk 1:255. 62. Linz, W., and B. A. Scholkens. 1992. A specific B2-bradykinin receptor antagonist HOE 140 abolishes the antihypertrophic effect of ramipril. Br. J. Pharmacol. 105:771. 63. Gallagher, A. M., H. Yu, and M. P. Printz. 1998. Bradykinin-induced reductions in collagen gene expression involve prostacyclin. Hypertension 32:84. 64. Anning, P. B., R. M. Grocott-Mason, and M. J. Lewis. 1997. Effects of sulphydryl- and non-sulphydryl-containing ACE inhibitors on left ventricular relaxation in the isolated guinea pig heart. Endothelium 5:265. 65. Eriksson, U., M. O. Kurrer, R. Bingisser, H. P. Eugster, P. Saremaslani, F. Follath, S. Marsch, and U. Widmer. 2001. Lethal autoimmune myocarditis in interferon-␥ receptor-deficient mice: enhanced disease severity by impaired inducible nitric oxide synthase induction. Circulation 103:18.