Download 16 From the Continental Shelf to the Deep Sea

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
16 From the Continental Shelf
to the Deep Sea
Notes for Marine Biology:
Function, Biodiversity, Ecology
By Jeffrey S. Levinton
SAMPLING AND OBSERVING THE SEA BED
Anchor dredge: digs to a specified depth
Peterson
Grab
Box
Corer
Alvin from WHOI
Video camera
Grabbing
arm
The Ventana, MBARI
Remote Operated Vehicle - ROV
The Shelf-Deep Sea Gradient
•  Supply of nutrient-rich particulates to
open ocean deep sea is low:
Distance from shore
Depth and time of travel of material from
surface to bottom(decomposition)
Low primary production over remote deep sea
bottoms
BOTTOM LINE: Input to open ocean bottom
is low. Exceptions: trenches, near continents
Global particulate C – SEAWIFS
satellite image
Depth, distance from continental margin, low productivity in open sea
Input of organic matter
•  Input of organic matter from water
column declines with depth and distance
from shore: continental shelf sediment
organic matter = 2-5%, open ocean
sediment organic matter = 0.5 - 1.5%,
open ocean abyssal bottoms beneath gyre
centers < 0.25%
Microbial Activity on Seabed
•  Sinking of the Alvin and lunch.
•  Mechanism - not so clear. High pressure
effect on decomposition (depth over
1000m) or perhaps low rates of microbial
activity in deep sea.
Microbial Activity on Seabed 2
•  Deep-sea bottom oxygen consumption 100-fold
less than at shelf depths
•  Bacterial substrates such as agar labeled with
radioactive carbon are taken up by bacteria at
a rate of 2 percent of uptake rate on shelf
bottoms
•  Animal activity is more complex. Deep sea
benthic biomass is very low, some benthic fishes
are poor in muscle mass - others are efficient
predators and attack bait presented
experimentally in bait buckets. Also some
special environments with high nutrients (more
later)
Deep-Sea Bacteria
•  Known to be barophilic
•  Have reduced respiration rates and reduced
conversions of substrates in heterotrophy
•  Genetically different from shallow water
strains
Global particulate C – SEAWIFS
satellite image
Depth, distance from continental margin, low productivity in open sea
IS THE DEEP SEA IN SLO-MO?
Low input
Low microbial activity
Low biomass
Inactive species (e.g., fish)
Hot Vents - Deep Sea Trophic
Islands
•  Hot Vents - sites usually on oceanic ridges where
hot water emerges from vents, associated with
volcanic activity
•  Sulfide emerges from vents, which supports large
numbers of sulfide-oxidizing bacteria, which in
turn support large scale animal community. Most
animals live in cooler water just adjacent to hot
vent source
•  Examples: Vestimentifera (Annelid), bivalves –
endosymbiotic bacteria; galatheid crabs feed
directly on bacterial mats
Sulfide life style – two flavors
•  Direct consumption of sulfide processing bacteria –
grazing molluscs, crabs- bacteria on rock surfaces
•  Intracellular symbioses – bacteria on and
intracellular in gills of bivalves, in vestimentiferan
worms – specialized hemoglobin binds to sulfide
Vestimentiferan tube worms at a hot vent
Galatheid crab
Vestimentiferan tube worms at a hot vent
Courtesy Richard Lutz
Vestimentiferan worms, zoarcid fish
Vestimentiferan worms, zoarcid fish
Population of hot-vent bivalve Calyptogena magnifica
Cold Seeps - Other Deep Sea
Trophic Islands
•  Deep sea escarpments may be sites for
leaking of high concentrations of
hydrocarbons
•  These sites also have sulfide based trophic
system with other bivalve and
vestimentiferan species that depend upon
sulfur bacterial symbionts
Whale carcasses!
•  Fallen whale carcass – scavengers,
decomposition, and then…..
http://extrememarine.org.uk/
Sulfide symbionts in boneworms!!
Osedax frankpressi – boneworm – has endosymbiotic
sulfide oxidizing bacteria, worm body grows into bone,
this species has dwarf males
Conclusion
•  Deep sea can have very fast growth and
activity IF there is a nutritive source
•  “nutritive islands” include hot vents, cold
seeps, large carcasses that fall to the deep
sea bed, even hunks of wood
Deep Water Coral Mounds
•  On deep sea mounts
•  Domination by corals, often > 500 y old
colonies
•  Diverse species live with corals
•  Very endangered because of associated
deep water fish of commercial interest like
orange roughy
FIG. 16.16 The deep-water coral Lophelia pertusa with squat lobster and
sea urchin. (Photograph by Steve W. Ross and others)
Marine Biology:
Function, Biodiversity,
Ecology, 4/e
Levinton
Copyright © 2014 by Oxford
University Press
FIG. 16.17 Some organisms found on deep-sea coral mounds.
(a) Large antipatharian coral (probably Leiopathes) on a northeast Atlantic
carbonate mound. (Image courtesy of AWI & I. Fremer)
(b) These examples show fauna from a giant carbonate mound in the
northeast Atlantic: (1) isopod Natatolana borealis, (2) gastropod
Boreotrophon clavatus, (3) brachiopod Macandrevia cranium,
(4) hydrocoral Pliobothrus symmeticus. (Images courtesy of L. A. Henry,
Scottish Association for Marine Science)
Marine Biology:
Function, Biodiversity,
Ecology, 4/e
Levinton
Copyright © 2014 by Oxford
University Press
Deep-sea biodiversity changes
•  Problem with sampling, great depths make it
difficult to recover benthic samples
•  Sanders and Hessler established transect from
Gay Head (Martha’s Vineyard, Island, near
Cape Cod) to Bermuda
•  Used bottom sampler with closing device
•  Found that muddy deep-sea floor biodiversity
was very high, in contrast to previous idea of
low species numbers
•  Concluded that deep sea is very diverse
Deep-sea biodiversity changes
•  Problem with sampling:
Number of
species recovered
Correction for sample size - Rarefaction
Number of individuals collected
2
Deep-sea biodiversity changes
•  Problem with sampling:
Number of
species recovered
Correction for sample size - Rarefaction
Number of individuals collected
2
Deep-sea biodiversity changes 3
•  Results: Number of species in deep sea
soft bottoms increases to maximum at
1500 - 2000 m depth, then decreases with
increasing depth to 4000m on abyssal
bottoms
•  In remote abyssal bottoms, diversity
declines and carnivorous animals are
conspicuously less frequent (low
population sizes of potential prey species)
Deep-sea biodiversity changes 4
Deep-sea biodiversity changes. Why?
•  Environmental stability hypothesis –
species accumulate in stable
environment, less extinction
•  Population size effect - explains decline in
abyss -carnivores?
•  Possible greater age of the deep sea,
•  Particle size diversity greater at depths of
ca. 1500m – might cause higher diversity
Environmental stability in the deep sea
Shelf waters less physically constant than deep waters
Seasonal variation in bottom-water temperature at different depths
The End
Have a nice summer!!
Final Thursday, May 12 here at
1115 AM